Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Are Reaping The ‘Whirlwind’ Kavanaugh Warned About
The Federalist ^ | May 1, 2020 | Molly Hemmingway

Posted on 05/01/2020 5:56:42 AM PDT by Kaslin

The media and Democrats were enraged when Brett Kavanaugh warned that their unethical behavior against him might have consequences. They should have listened.


Brett Kavanaugh was a very difficult Supreme Court nominee for liberals to oppose. He had a stellar reputation, an impeccable record, and a genial disposition. While members of the Resistance held a protest on the steps of the Supreme Court minutes after President Trump announced him as the pick to replace retiring Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy, their early efforts to keep him off the bench showed little promise.

All that changed in mid-September 2018, when the Washington Post carefully packaged and presented Christine Blasey Ford’s claim that Kavanaugh had tried to rape her when she was in high school. The media and Democrats immediately latched onto the accusation in a desperate attempt to keep Kavanaugh from being confirmed.

It wasn’t the quality of the allegation that led to this reaction. Blasey Ford had no evidence she had ever met Kavanaugh, much less that he had tried to rape her. She wasn’t sure about any detail related to the event other than that she had precisely one beer and that Kavanaugh had tried to rape her.

She didn’t know how she got to the alleged event, where it was, how she got home, or whose house it was. None of the four witnesses she identified to reporters as having been at the event in question supported her claim. That included her close friend Leland Keyser, who was pressured by mutual acquaintances to change her testimony that she had no recollection of the event in question. Kavanaugh had an army of close friends and supporters who testified to his character throughout his adolescence and adulthood.

Nevertheless, over the next ten days, thousands of articles were published in newspapers and online while broadcast and cable news outlets devoted their entire schedule to covering the accusation. All hands were on deck to legitimize the allegation, paint the accuser in the most sympathetic light possible, downplay the many problems with her story, and ignore exonerating information. Anybody who supported Kavanaugh, from high school friends to sitting U.S. senators, was subjected to hostile media treatment and accusations of being a rape apologist.

The nation watched in horror as the federal judge, a happily married father of two young girls, was repeatedly called a rapist. MSNBC contributor Jason Johnson called Kavanaugh “the fifth guy in the gang rape.” That was after Michael Avenatti’s client Julie Swetnick claimed, absurdly, that Kavanaugh was the secret leader of a serial gang rape cartel that roamed the streets of suburban Maryland. One reporter admitted that she was trying to spin another murky claim from a Kavanaugh classmate at Yale specifically to show a pattern of misconduct.

It was a terrifying mob, the worst kind of feeding frenzy many Americans had ever witnessed. Democratic senators on the Judiciary Committee accepted each claim, no matter how outlandish. After Swetnick’s obviously ridiculous claim, all committee Democrats called for the immediate withdrawal of Kavanaugh’s nomination.

It all culminated with reopened hearings in which Blasey Ford publicly accused Kavanaugh, still with no evidence, and Kavanaugh fought to defend himself. In a lengthy opening statement, he reminded the gathered how they had publicly opposed him from the moment of his nomination, with Schumer saying publicly he would oppose Kavanaugh with everything he’s got. Another senator called Kavanaugh evil and said those who supported him were “complicit in evil.”

I understand the passions of the moment, but I would say to those senators, your words have meaning. Millions of Americans listen carefully to you. Given comments like those, is it any surprise that people have been willing to do anything to make any physical threat against my family, to send any violent e-mail to my wife, to make any kind of allegation against me and against my friends. To blow me up and take me down.

You sowed the wind. For decades to come, I fear that the whole country will reap the whirlwind.

The media and other partisans were enraged by Kavanaugh’s remarks. “Brett Kavanaugh just got remarkably angry — and political,” opined the Washington Post’s Aaron Blake. The New Yorker’s Benjamin Wallace-Wells editorialized that Kavanaugh had given an “Angry, Partisan, Trump-Like Opening Statement.” His successful renunciation of the charges was evidenced by his opponents coalescing around a new talking point that he was too upset at the false accusation he was a serial gang rapist.

The events of the last weeks have proven Kavanaugh right. While even two years ago the media and Democrats may have gotten away with burying the sexual assault allegation against Joe Biden, it’s not working now. They have no one to blame but themselves.

It may have seemed necessary to play around with false accusations of serial gang rape to stop a nominee from securing a place on the Supreme Court — or to make sure the justice would always have an “asterisk” next to his name on any abortion decision, as Blasey Ford’s attorney admitted was her client’s goal. But the move has unbelievably serious consequences.

Remember that Biden himself joined the pile-on against Kavanaugh. As Marc Thiessen reminds readers:

Who was cheering them on the whole time? Joe Biden. The former vice president insisted that Ford ‘should be given the benefit of the doubt’ and declared that ‘for a woman to come forward in the glaring lights of focus, nationally, you’ve got to start off with the presumption that at least the essence of what she’s talking about is real, whether or not she forgets facts.’ He called, through a spokesperson, for ‘thorough and nonpartisan effort to get to the truth, wherever it leads.’ He hailed her testimony as ‘courageous, credible and powerful.’ He even explained away her lack of corroborating witnesses, declaring ‘if, God forbid, you walked out and somebody patted you in the rear end, your boss, or said something to you, how many of you would go report it?’

If the media and Democrats thought that they could get away with their despicable behavior with Kavanaugh and then turn around and attempt to bury a sexual assault allegation against Biden, they were sorely mistaken.

Since the media and Democrats don’t have consistent standards for how they deal with accusations of sexual assault, they are facing consequences. It’s an incredibly low bar, but there is no question that Tara Reade’s claim against Biden is significantly stronger than Blasey Ford’s claim against Kavanaugh.

For instance, Reade has evidence she met Biden. No one disputes she worked for him in 1993. Further, she has incredibly strong evidence that she told multiple people that Biden assaulted her at the time she claimed it happened. Her own mother called into CNN’s Larry King show to discuss the matter in 1993! Blasey Ford’s story changed in the recent years she began telling it, but was not told for several decades and not before Kavanaugh had become a nationally known figure.

None of this is to say that Biden is guilty, but the media and Democrats sure as hell are. They were willing to destroy a man’s life over far weaker claims, so they in no way can excuse ignoring Reade’s claim. Whether or not the media and Democrats want to acknowledge the growing anger over their despicable double standards, the anger is not going away.

They sowed the wind with their treatment of Kavanaugh. Now more than just Kavanaugh may fear that for the decades to come, the whole country will reap the whirlwind.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: brettkavanaugh; demonrats; joebiden; sexualassault; tarareade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Opinionated Blowhard
As always, the Democrats and their media enablers change tactics a hundred times a year.

This.

21 posted on 05/01/2020 6:47:17 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte (With every passing day, I am a little bit gladder that Romney lost in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Dems are not reaping anything. The media will cover for Biden and this is going nowhere.


22 posted on 05/01/2020 6:54:19 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods ("As government expands, liberty contracts." -Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

-——Tara Reade’s claim against Biden-——

is but prelude

Hell is yet to come


23 posted on 05/01/2020 6:58:16 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy
That is a heck of a lot more evidence than Blasey Ford ever had which was exactly ZERO.
Blasey Ford never mentioned the alleged sexual assault to even one single human being. Not her mother, not her father, not her brother not even her best friend, who totally denied anything like that happened.
Blasey Ford could not tell us what year or even what street or who's house this fake incident happened. In sum, Blasey Ford never met Kavanaugh in her life.
Reade already has two friends with who have come out to confirm being told about the sexual assault at the time it happened.
24 posted on 05/01/2020 7:01:05 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Remember the ‘powerful’ argument that any accuser such as Christine Blasey Ford has to be believed because she risks such damage to reputation and finances when she does such a ‘brave’ act. Has anyone noticed how this ‘argument’ appears to only apply to one side of the political spectrum?

Take the Lewinsky Affair where Linda Tripp was instrumental in the outcome with the DNA blue dress. She was arrested and tried for violating the law against surreptitious telephone recording in her conversations with Ms Lewinsky. She was acquitted but obviously had legal costs involved. There were multiple other offenses against her to the point of her suing the Justice & Defense Departments and winning $595k cash and other benefits in 2003. Yet she cited in a later interview that her settlement did not cover her costs.

Then we have Christine Blasey Ford and her very last minute accusation of an offense 30 years in the past against a sitting Federal Judge up for a Supreme Court seat. No contemporary confirmations, little details and a great deal of emotion. While it is now Judge Kavanaugh, she, Christine Blasey Ford, appears to have suffered nothing in the aftermath. Like another accuser, Anita Hill, she appears to have secured a hallowed place in the LEFT’s pantheon of ‘brave women’!

Hypocrites are Democrats ... hmmm?


25 posted on 05/01/2020 7:06:59 AM PDT by SES1066 (Happiness is a depressed Washington, DC housing market!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SES1066

In all honesty, I’m surprised the Dims are fighting so hard for Joe. They MUST know he’s a weak candidate. You’d think they’d want to find someone stronger, or, at the very least, someone who can string two sentences together.

TDS makes people do strange things.


26 posted on 05/01/2020 7:23:24 AM PDT by Kharis13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kharis13

It’s all part of the plan - they want Joe to be the nominee, but with Hilliary as his VP candidate. If by some chance Joe wins the election, she will step in the day after his inauguration due to his being unable to govern due to medical issues.


27 posted on 05/01/2020 7:46:43 AM PDT by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kharis13

And if not for Trump and his brass balls there would be no Justice Kavanaugh. Any other president would gave pulled his nomination.


28 posted on 05/01/2020 7:54:32 AM PDT by gcparent (Justice Brett Kavanaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kharis13

Joe was their only way to keep Bernie out, they are stuck with him.


29 posted on 05/01/2020 8:13:53 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: knarf

I am struggling to make it to June one which will be my 76th. I can assure you that you are NOT imagining. Ayn Rand warned many decades ago about what was afoot and since Donald J. Trump officially announced his candidacy for president I have had the feeling of living in her boook ATLAS SHRUGGED. If you have not read it you should and don’t waste time critiquing her writing skills, just pay attention to her message which is amazingly accurate.


30 posted on 05/01/2020 9:04:45 AM PDT by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: knarf

Our sons are in their 20’s. They are both good men, but they have clearly been influenced by their immersion in the leftist culture of the educational system in the US. I try to remember that many of us were swayed back in the 1960’s and 1970’s but returned to our roots. It is an unwholesome culture on many levels. Time for the pendulum to swing back.


31 posted on 05/01/2020 9:08:17 AM PDT by Think free or die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Democrats aren’t reaping the whirlwind. The DemonRats are behind getting rid of Joe because he had lost his marbles.


32 posted on 05/01/2020 9:16:23 AM PDT by Old Yeller (The answer to 1984 is 1776.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inspectorette

You are astoundingly brilliant, your analysis agrees exactly with mine!


33 posted on 05/01/2020 9:18:20 AM PDT by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Democrats don’t even think of consequences or the future, when it comes to getting what they want. They’re basically children.


34 posted on 05/01/2020 10:52:35 AM PDT by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inspectorette; RipSawyer
It’s all part of the plan - they want Joe to be the nominee, but with Hilliary as his VP candidate. If by some chance Joe wins the election, she will step in the day after his inauguration due to his being unable to govern due to medical issues.
That could be their plan - but given Bernie Sanders’ standing, unifying the party around it could be an interesting proposition.

OTOH the Republicans might make quite a lot of the fact that Hillary would deign to accept the VP nomination. “Hillary, given the 25th Amendment, what do you think is the life expectancy of Joe Biden’s life presidency, were he to win?”

In retrospect - and not exclusively in retrospect - the Sweden approach looks better than what the US has done. Yeah, they might possibly have lost some seniors a year or two prematurely - but the side effects of a shutdown which they avoided are nothing to sneeze at. IMHO they will be better off, in the immediate future, than if they had gone all Gretchen Whitmer on their country.

We’d be a lot better off if we had gone all Ron DeSantis on our country. Having said that, President Trump’s covid policy has been roundly - even fanatically - opposed by the Democrats, but never from a coherent policy perspective. Let alone a coherent Ron DeSantis policy emphasizing maximum sheltering seniors and otherwise “letting her ride” to the maximum extent.

“You can’t beat somebody with nobody” - and by now, President Trump is somebody. And of all things the Democrats might make hay over, I don’t think their impeachment of the president - just when the real issue was China and Corona - will be something to brag on.

I also think Trump was politically brilliant by feinting in the direction of directing the return to normal from Washington - then quickly acceding when the governors objected. Now the economic carnage is, largely, on the governors. It looks like that will play pretty well for the president and his party in November. With the usual caveat that “A week is an eternity in politics.”


35 posted on 05/01/2020 11:14:55 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (Socialism is cynicism directed towards society and - correspondingly - naivete towards government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: knarf

I concur, and I’m 70.


36 posted on 05/01/2020 12:03:54 PM PDT by A Navy Vet (I'm not Islamophobic - I'm Islamonauseous. Also LGBTQxyz nauseous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: knarf

I concur, and I’m 70.


37 posted on 05/01/2020 12:06:18 PM PDT by A Navy Vet (I'm not Islamophobic - I'm Islamonauseous. Also LGBTQxyz nauseous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

Exactly.


38 posted on 05/01/2020 12:13:38 PM PDT by Jane Austen (Neo-cons are liberal Democrats who love illegal aliens and war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson