Posted on 05/12/2020 11:28:47 AM PDT by Kaslin
RUSH: This is the ongoing effort here to expose the coup and the people who ran it that attempted to overturn a duly constituted election a legal and fair election attempted to reverse the result, attempted to get the winner thrown out of office with a failed allegation/phony allegation of colluding with Russia.
We continue to learn even more about this.
I want to take you back. You may not remember this. When the transcript of the phone call between President Trump and the president of Ukraine was released, it was really noteworthy that the president asked the president of Ukraine for assistance in looking into CrowdStrike. Now, when I read that in the transcript of the phone call, man, oh, man, did my radar rise up and my red flags rise up.
Because that told me that Trump was on this like, as they say, white on rice. And it told me that what Trump was actually doing in this phone call with the president of Ukraine was asking the president to cooperate with Barr, to cooperate with Durham in the investigation into the coup to get rid of Trump. Now, let me refresh your memory as to CrowdStrike.
It may ring a bell.
Yeah, Ive heard that. I dont know what that is.
When the Democrat National Committee computer network and servers were hacked in 2016, the Democrat National Committee refused to let the FBI examine the server or any part of the network. Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz, the chairman of the Democrat National Committee, refused to turn over the servers or any part of the network to the FBI for any forensic analysis.
Instead, the Democrat National Committee claimed that they were hacked by the Russians. The Russians hacked, and the Russians then led to the hacking of Podestas emails and the embarrassing reveal of those emails during the campaign starting in October. The Russians did it! The Russians did it! The Russians did it!
Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz went out and hired a private sector computer network analysis construction and forensics team called CrowdStrike to come in and do the forensic analysis of their servers while refusing to let the FBI see them and, by the way, James Comey and the FBI said, Okay, fine! You dont want us to see your servers? Fine.
Let me ask you: If the FBI comes knocking on your office door, wants to see your server, and you say, Sorry, I dont want you to, will they just walk away? Think the FBIs gonna just walk away when you tell them that they cant see your server, that you dont need them to look at it, that youve got it handled?
Well, thats exactly what happened to the Democrat National Committee, and the FBI said, Oh! Okay. Comey and McCabe and the boys said, Fine. To this day, the FBI has not seen the Democrat National Committee servers or any aspect of the network that was hacked. We dont even know that it was hacked! The truth the matter is, we dont even know it was.
Now, you might be asking, Well, whats the big deal about this? Well, let me connect the dots for you. We have been connecting the dots and talking about all the bombshells that are in the classified documents that were released by Adam Schiff, who chaired that basement committee looking into Trump-Russia collusion and then Ukraine impeachment and so forth.
But a particular bombshell has not gotten much news, even though it came out on Friday. The released transcripts The acting director of national intelligence, Ric Grennell, he forced the release of these transcripts cause he told Schiff, If you dont do it, Im going to. So Schiff did it. They didnt want these transcripts to be released because look what theyve exposed!
Theyve exposed that Comey, Brennan, Clapper every one of these people were lying through their teeth about this Russian collusion business. And what theyve also exposed is that Barack Obama was probably the orchestrator of this. More on that coming up and you dont want to miss this. The released transcripts show that the president of CrowdStrike was brought in to testify before Schiffs committee.
This was, again, the firm hired to investigate the Democrat National Committee servers and computer network to find out who did it, to find out who hacked them. The president of CrowdStrike told Schiffs committee they didnt know. They couldnt find out. They couldnt learn. They couldnt say for certain the Russians had hacked the DNC server.
They could not say for sure that the Russians were involved in letting Podestas emails out. Well, now, folks, for crying out loud, that is only the entire basis for the entire Russian collusion claim! That the FBI was refused permission to see the DNC server, they hired CrowdStrike, CrowdStrike was said to
They didnt publicly say it, the DNC said this, that the people they had hired, CrowdStrike, demonstrated that their servers were hacked by Russia. And so that was part of this two-year, never-ending pack of lies about this story. It turns out that the president of CrowdStrike couldnt figure out who had hacked the DNC server.
They couldnt say for certain that it was the Russians. CrowdStrike also never allowed the FBI to examine the DNC server. What ? Now, we know why. My guess is the server wasnt hacked. My guess I dont think the Russians hacked the DNC server at all. They made that up too, and the guy that runs CrowdStrike was testifying under oath that they couldnt confirm that the Russians had done the hacking.
And yet in the New York Times and the Washington Post and CNN and all of that every day for two years in addition to intelligence officials claiming they had evidence of Trump colluding with Russia, that Trump was a spy, was a traitor they had evidence that the Russians had hacked the DNC server, and had tried to hack the Republican National Committee servers but had failed.
Now, something happened. There was some stuff that was on the DNC server that did leak out of it, but Im here to tell you that it was an inside job. Somebody at the Democrat National Committee actually went in there and arranged for whatever data they wanted out to be stolen from that server.
But the Russians didnt hack it. It didnt come from an outside computer connection outside the building, outside the network. But yet everybody has been laboring under the belief that it did all this time. And this assertion that the Russians hacked the DNC server was the entire basis that got Russian collusion up, started, and rolling.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: I want to go back to the CrowdStrike business because these are all things that are connected, folks. I know it may be tough to believe, but please dont doubt me. This objective of destroying the U.S. economy to save us from a virus, it really is destroying Donald Trump. Thats the objective. In their minds, theyll deal with whatever mess they make in the process later. They have got to get rid of Trump. They are singularly focused and obsessed with this, and they have been since election night 2016.
Its all connected. Trump-Russia collusion, Kavanaugh, the impeachment over the phone call with the president of Ukraine, its all the same thing. And all of it is a lie. They didnt just start telling the truth now. So here are what these declassified transcripts show. CrowdStrike couldnt even say for sure that Russia hacked or stole Democrat National Committee emails. The reason this is important is because that assertion was the entire basis for the entire Russian collusion claim.
When I would ask anybody, I asked my friends in Washington, could somebody show me, you guys are all just accepting the idea that the Russians meddled. What did they do? And every time I asked somebody, They hacked the DNC servers. Oh. Well, they didnt. We now know they didnt. We now know the people investigating the hack couldnt say that the Russians did it or anybody else did it. But even my friends in Washington, even people on my side, cause I never believed the Russian meddling. I didnt even believe that. That too it seemed to me nothing but a bunch of conventional wisdom that everybody was accepting because it made things easier to accept.
If youre gonna go on TV and talk about this, you have to accept the Russians meddled or else the hosts on TV will browbeat you and accuse you of being a bigot or whatever, so its one of these things you have to accept. Well, I never did, cause I never saw any evidence. What was the evidence of Russian hacking? I knew the Russians didnt have a damn thing to do with the outcome of the election.
The Russians did not tamper with one vote. Rod Rosenstein even said so in announcing indictments of Russians during the Mueller hearings. The Russians didnt do diddly-squat. But I would ask people, Howd they meddle? They said, They hacked the DNC server. Well, now we know that they didnt.
CrowdStrikes Shawn Henry was interviewed by House Intelligence Committee members in December 2017. This is two and a half years. Weve been under a lie for two and a half years, a series of them.
"Declassified documents released by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff show the president of CrowdStrike couldnt say for certain that Russians downloaded Democratic Party emails. December 2017. There were Republicans in this damn hearing who heard this guy say it, just like there were Republicans in this hearing who heard Clapper and Brennan and all these other people come up and say, Nah, we dont have enough evidence the Russians, and they let the lie that these people were telling on TV every night, that the Russians had hacked or that the Russians did collude with Trump. And yet there were Republicans that knew this is all a lie, who knew every syllable of it was BS and never publicly corrected the record. They just let all this play out.
During the interview made public Thursday, Shawn Henry explained that CrowdStrike found some evidence that information was taken from DNC servers, but it was not conclusive.
He got a question from Democrat Joaquin Castro, Texas, There is evidence of exfiltration, not conclusive, but indicators of exfiltration off the DNC. Meaning somebody took something off of it. Henry said that based on the evidence his firm reviewed, they believe 70 gigabytes of data were exfiltrated from the DNCs network. However, when asked by Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas) whether he could unequivocally say it was or not was exfiltrated out of the DNC, from what you know of?' The CrowdStrike guy couldnt even say that, much less that the Russians did it. The CrowdStrike guy couldnt even confirm that any data left the DNC server, much less that Russia did it.
And Im telling you foundation for all of this collusion, stealing the election, meddling, its all rooted right here in the belief that the Russians hacked the DNC server. Now, some stuff from that server ended up in the public domain, and CrowdStrike could not confirm how. That tells me they know how. If theyre gonna sit there and say, under oath, if theyre gonna sit there and deny, theyre gonna, No, no, no, no, no. We cant tie this to the Russians, well, they know how it happened.
Let me refresh your memory on one other thing, and its data transfer speeds. Now, I know some of you working at home, you want to download a movie or a gigantic file from a server somewhere. And the speed of your download depends on how much youre willing to pay for it. You have your internet service provider, and you may be buying 50 megabits down, you may be buying 125, whatever. But its an economic decision. And youve made the decision, Well, I dont need to pay a whole lot of money for it cause Im not that impatient. If something takes two hours to download, thats what it takes.
There are maximum speeds that you can exfiltrate data from a server over the internet. The speeds with which data left the Democrat National Committee server are much faster than is possible over the internet. This has also been released in classified testimony long before this. Weve known that the data that did come off that server did not come from an internet hack because the data transfer speeds were so much faster than you can get over the internet unless well, they are.
The kind of transfer speeds when you attach a jump drive or a thumb drive to a computer and start downloading data from the hard drive to the thumb drive, thats lickety-split. You cant even approach that speed with an internet connection. And thats the speed that data left the DNC servers at. So that would tend to indicate that whatever happened on that server was an inside job, that somebody went in there, attached a thumb drive to one of the servers, downloaded a bunch of data, and sent it off to WikiLeaks.
That would mean either an employee of the DNC or somebody in the Democrat Party or a spy. But it was not the Russians, and it was not an internet hack. It was nothing that they lied through their teeth and told us it was for going on now three and a half years.
Had to be inside job, someone within DNC using a flash drive who removed items they did not want to be found.
Someone needs to pass this info to Trey Gowdy.
His name was Seth Rich.
Hackers are sophisticated nowadays. The DNC wasn’t that serious about security. It didn’t have to be an inside job.
It was Seth Rich that copied the data and gave it to Wiki Leaks and Hillary and Podesta had their FBI contractors kill him and than had the FBI 7’th floor blame it on the Russians and of corse the FBI did not investigate the server and tell the DNC it had to turn the servers over, because the already knew there was no evidence of Russian activity. SETH RICH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's already been proven that the emails forwarded to Wikileaks were LOCALLY DOWNLOADED TO A THUMB DRIVE and ALSO, Julian Assange stated that the Russians were NOT involved in Wikileaks acquisition of the emails.
In order for Team Obama to perpetrate the LIE about the Russians hacking the DNC emails, Seth Rich had to be ERASED.
John Durham please tell us you are looking into and have investigators following up on the Seth Rich murder. Time for the truth to be told God willing.
Data rate supposedly indicates it happened inside
Because the FBI already KNEW that such analysis would show the Russians had NO involvement of hacking the server!
This is a huge "DUH!" that everyone should conclude. Paging Captain OBVIOUS.
Was the stolen pistol used in the Seth Rich murder? Is that true?
The next question is, who ordered the hit to murder him? We already are pretty sure who actually pulled the trigger. Those MS-13 killers ended up themselves dead in a car in North Myrtle Beach the next day.
That is my personal opinion. What better way for the FBI to prevent ballistics testing on a hand gun than to report it stolen? Obvious to me, not so much to others. Remember, Team Obama’s reign was riddled with COINCIDENCES.
As Rush mentioned, the D/L speeds were too fast for net downloads...had to be onsite.
I’ve seen no mention of a stolen pistol until today. However, if my understanding is correct, the FBI fires test rounds from each of its pistols to get the ballistic fingerprints of those pistols so it can distinguish bullets fired from them and bullets fired from other pistols.
Can’t remember his name right off the bat. But the guy who worked for the DNC that ended up dead in DC?
That’s him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.