Posted on 05/31/2020 6:38:43 AM PDT by Kaslin
President Trump recently made news when he protested the mailing of voting ballots in some states and expressed concerns about the increasing potential for voter fraud as a result. Twitter labeled the tweet in need of fact-checking and set off a media firestorm.
The fact of the matter is that we need to look beyond the partisan labels when considering whether we should suddenly alter how we vote and focus our attention on protecting the voice of the American people.
For example, a ballot vendor mistakenly shipped ballots intended for South Carolina voters to Maryland recently, reinforcing the risk involved in orchestrating a more complicated process. “Glitches” in the system kept many voters from even receiving their ballots in a special Maryland election last month. Thousands of voters were ignored when their absentee ballots were not counted in the Wisconsin primary, again due to glitches in the process.
Thousands of Oregon voters claim their party designation was changed prior to ballots being sent out, keeping them from being able to vote in their party’s primary. When voters began speaking up on Facebook, their posts were removed. Twitter has shut down an account used by disgruntled voters after the Oregon Secretary of State claimed they were publishing misinformation by claiming their ballots were changed. But the voters insist something nefarious took place.
The Oregon situation highlights the greatest challenge with mail-in balloting: the potential for fraud. As Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick succinctly put it, the further the voter gets from the ballot box, the more opportunity for fraud. In spite of what Twitter claimed, there is a reason why members of both parties have historically rejected voting by mail: it opens the door for greater manipulation of election results.
A bipartisan federal election reform report from 2005 chaired by former President Jimmy Carter and former U.S. Secretary of State James Baker concluded, “Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.” The New York Times agreed in 2012 that mail-in balloting is “more easily abused” and “votes cast by mail are less likely to be counted, more likely to be compromised and more likely to be contested than those cast in a voting booth.”
There are numerous incidents of outright fraud with mail-in and absentee ballots. We have a mail carrier in West Virginia who has been charged with tampering with ballots. We saw candidates accused of collecting ballots and submitting them to potentially alter results of an election in North Carolina in 2018. The results of that election eventually had to be overturned.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom has already decided to have ballots mailed to every registered voter for the November election—whether they want them or intend to use them. Unfortunately, his state is notorious for not keeping election records up-to-date, which means there may be a lot of ballots lying around, waiting for misuse.
Some have pushed for shifting to mail-only ballots out of concern about the spread of the COVID-19 virus. Of course, we should take precautions and ensure social distancing can be maintained and sound safety procedures are followed. But there was no surge in COVID-19 cases after Wisconsin successfully conducted normal, in-person voting in their primary, even after media outcry about it.
In addition, as the economy has been reopening, we’ve proven it is possible for large groups of people to safely shop together in Walmart and similar stores across the nation. Is it not too much to expect the American people to bring some patience with them to the voting booth to protect the sacred right to vote in our republic?
Some have proposed bypassing the mail and moving to online voting. But the concerns of vote tampering are even greater in a digital universe. Between the potential for hacking and the ease by which votes can be altered by a few simple keystrokes, the risks to voting integrity are even greater.
Yet three states are already moving in that direction, despite warnings from cybersecurity experts on the risks. In fact, The Department of Homeland Security, the FBI and the Election Assistance Commission offered guidance a few weeks ago, warning states about the significant security challenges involved when moving any part of the voting process online. Researchers at MIT warn that an app already being tested for voting could allow hackers to change voting results.
We should not be afraid of using technology to improve our nation’s systems, but this issue is not simply about improving logistics. It’s about protecting the voice of the American citizen.
Voting is a privilege enjoyed by relatively few people around the world now and by even fewer throughout human history. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, only 53 percent of people eligible to vote actually turned out to cast a vote in the 2018 midterm elections.
Some of that reluctance may be caused by too many of the American people feeling like their vote doesn’t really matter anymore. With big government corruption, big business lobbying, and big tech censorship, it's no wonder a typical middle-class American might feel less than enthusiastic about voting. Is anyone really listening? Does their vote matter anymore?
It's easy to feel overwhelmed by these forces ignoring them, drowning them out, or editing their opinions. We don’t need yet another way for corruption to make their voice irrelevant. Make no mistake, the widespread use of voting by mail would be an open invitation to more corruption.
We need to preserve the voting rights of the mom who juggles family and career; the dad who works two jobs to give his kids a better opportunity; the grandparent who want to enjoy their well-earned time with family and make a difference in their community; the small business owner who takes risks every day to serve those around them; and the recent college graduate just getting started in a career.
All of these, and millions of similar voices, deserve to be heard. Each is equally important, and each is unique in its story. The silencing of any one of us is a crime against all of us who make up the tapestry of America.
We must safeguard the integrity of the voting process for every American. If we are to preserve our freedoms, it begins with the ability to cast our vote and know that it matters—and it will be counted, not corrupted because we rushed to shift to voting by mail.
That’s a fact.
The riots that the democRATs are endorsing are a great reason why there is no need for “Cheat By Mail”, too.
Our Republic was founded on the idea that an active, informed free people can sustain a government by self-rule that will provide a better government than does a monarchy or oligarchic elite. Such a government can only be sustained by having direct participation by its citizens.
In-person voting is important as we citizens gather together, are vetted by showing we are the named person voting, are residents of the locality and are citizens eligible to vote. We then write out our ballot and drop it in the box. The ritual and act is important as each voter has the feeling that he/she is participating in our society.
If you can riot in person, you can vote in person.
Of course. Massive voter fraud is the Democrats’ only hope.
That there, is Trump Tweet material.
The democrats wouldn’t even exist if not for voter fraud. they use it every election. It’s how they’ve taken over so many major cities.
But if they end the mail-in voting now, what happens to the Dems who already voted against Trump on ballots early and often. Nursing home residents and dead voters still on registration rolls voted Dem all the way.
Some Dems voted a dozen times already. Will their votes not count now? What kind of America is this, anyway? /S
Wow. Terrific line.
Precisely! That whole “being too afraid” of ChicomVirus to Vote hit the crapper, big time!
Typical Conservative Inc. claptrap. This is the “just the tip” strategy that has served America so well for the last 70 years (”just the tip” is the standard conservative answer, it’s never, “Hell, no you won’t!”).
The conservatives have accepted the Leftist major premise (as they always do), which is that not enough people are voting, that this is a “stain on our democracy”, and that voting should therefore be made easier.
The CORRECT premise is that too many people are voting, which reduces the quality of public servants, which compromises our quality of life and eventually our safety, and that voting should therefore be made harder.
There should be no mail in voting, ever. There should be no electronic voting, and any mechanical voting “machine” should be locked with a seal and should be observed before, during, and after use by election judges with opposed interests.
Paper ballots should be the standard. They must be received, in person, at a designated polling place from an election judge who is under observation by poll watchers with opposed interests.
Voting hours should be liberal, but should not exceed 7AM-9PM on a single day which is uniform throughout the United States. Counting of ballots should occur at the point of collection, by counters with opposed interests, and tallies must be completed by 3AM the day after the close of voting and submitted to the relevant authorities by 5AM that morning.
As soon as votes are tallied and the tally sheets signed, all physical ballots must be secured under lock, key, and seal with access only by court order, and once the election is certified by the supervising authority (which in the case of choosing of Electors must be under the control of a State Legislature), all physical ballots and tally sheets should be destroyed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.