Posted on 08/19/2020 10:18:29 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
Sally Yates, an Obama holdover who served as acting attorney general in the early days of the Trump administration, denounced the president and heralded her refusal to defend his travel ban during Tuesday night remarks to the Democratic National Convention.
Yates is widely considered a frontrunner for attorney general should Democratic nominee Joe Biden prevail in the November election. She is also immediately adjacent to two of the Trump era's greatest controversies: the president's travel ban and the surveillance of Trump associates during the 2016 campaign.
"I was fired for refusing to defend President Trump's shameful and unlawful travel ban," Yates said. "That was the start of his relentless attacks on our democratic institutions and countless dedicated public servants."
"He's trampled the rule of law, trying to weaponize our Justice Department to attack his enemies and protect his friends," she added.
A subsequent iteration of the ban was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. Those travel sanctions have since been modified and expanded. The justices first allowed the travel restrictions to take effect while legal fights unfolded in 2017, albeit on a limited basis.
Though Yates cast her refusal to defend the order as clear and decisive in Tuesday's speech, her actions at the time appeared more cautious. In a carefully crafted letter circulated to Justice Department staff shortly after Trump's order came down, Yates did not say that the order couldn't be defended. Instead, she hedged, writing that she was "not convinced" that the order was legal.
Her letter elsewhere suggested that statements made by Trump and his surrogates show that the ban's true purpose is stigmatizing Muslims, as opposed to national security. The High Court ultimately declined to consider that evidence, however, concluding that it was not relevant to their review.
Even after leaving the administration, Yates has remained a Washington fixture as investigations into surveillance of the Trump campaign unfold. She most recently testified before Congress on August 5, saying she would not have signed off on applications to surveil Trump campaign adviser Carter Page had she known those applications contained omissions. An inspector general investigation found 17 separate errors or omissions in government process to obtain surveillance warrants for Page.
Yates's actions nonetheless made her an early hero to the president's opponents. After her dismissal, she took up an academic perch at Georgetown, then went into private practice at King & Spalding, a highly lucrative law firm based in her native Georgia.
“””He’s trampled the rule of law, trying to weaponize our Justice Department to attack his enemies and protect his friends,” she added. “”””
Is she talking about obama?
“I was fired for refusing to defend President Trump’s shameful and unlawful travel ban,”
Unlawful?
Supreme Court says otherwise.
The President’s travel ban was lawful. PERIOD.
And don’t get me started on the stupidity of calling it Islamophobic.
43 Islamic majority country’s citizens were NEVER banned. Only 7 were. They all had failed/failing governments who could not verify their citizens non-criminal, non-terrorist history.
If Trump’s act was to keep Muslim’s out, it was absolutely ineffective.
AG is the most important position in government now. Its both the most political and the most powerful.
AG controls everything regarding Fed.gov in our bureacratic/lawless/highly politicized society - from criminal and national security investigations to prosecution of crime (or completely ignoring crime) for all the laws in existence. This position has ultimate power.
And there’s only one side willing to weaponize it with no pushback.
She should be breaking rocks in the hot sun.
“she would not have signed off on applications to surveil Trump campaign adviser Carter Page had she known those applications contained omissions”
Perjury
Nothing but out and out CYA perjury
Her only claim to fame is her short reign as acting attorney general in 2017, so of course she will spend the rest of her life dwelling on the politics of early 2017. The rest of us have moved on.
Huh? Who the hell is Sally Yates?
It was not a ban on bearded savages. It was a ban on entry from countries that didn’t vet their people well enough.
Although, banning bearded savages is a worthwhile cause in itself.
A hero to the left wing.
“Islamophobic”
Who cares if it was?
Islam is not a religion, it’s a political system - thus the plethora of “Islamic Republics”, two of which we started and sustain now since we invaded them.
The deliberate attempt by the Left to equate fear of Islam with racism undermines the rational imperative to recognize and deal with threats.
So, the official Democrat position is it would have been WRONG to keep terrorists and COVID out of the country?
Is that correct?
The Supreme Court found his travel ban lawful. So if she thinks it was unlawful, she won’t be a good AG now, will she.
Look forward to her extended stay at the “Village”.
Be seeing you.
WHERE is ANY REPUBLICAN holding a Press Conference to refute her lies????
One of them lies, and all the rest swear to it.
“””WHERE is ANY REPUBLICAN holding a Press Conference to refute her lies????”””
Probably cheering her on and hoping for a Slow-N-Ho win so President Trump can’t expose their crimes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.