Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court orders Pennsylvania Democrats to respond in ballot dispute
The Washington Times ^ | 11/0472020 | By Alex Swoyer

Posted on 11/04/2020 6:04:10 PM PST by dpetty121263

The Supreme Court ordered Pennsylvania Democrats to respond by Thursday evening in a case challenging the state’s three-day extension for counting mail-in ballots.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: battle; election; elections; fight; fraud; mailinballots; pennsylvania; prayer; scotus; soldier; solution; trump; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181 next last
To: FightforFreedomCA

“You think ACB will side with the traitors?”

Probably not, but I wouldn’t be surprised. It would be her statement that she isn’t in Trump’s pocket — make her seem more “legitimate” and fair.


61 posted on 11/04/2020 6:58:36 PM PST by MayflowerMadam (Liberty over lock-downs. Freedom over face masks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Spirit of Liberty

so this is just a response to the motion to intervene.

iow

the USSC is asking if they object if Trump/representative plaintiff intervenes.


62 posted on 11/04/2020 7:00:06 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.tand http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dpetty121263

What about North Carolina? Allowing ballots to come in up until November 12th? Nine days after the election? This is unheard of! What in the world is going on here?


63 posted on 11/04/2020 7:00:28 PM PST by nfldgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

it depends on the reality bubble around the judge. (for example roberts)


64 posted on 11/04/2020 7:02:30 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.tand http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: dpetty121263

PA told SCOTUS no, that they will continue counting.


65 posted on 11/04/2020 7:04:38 PM PST by Thunder90 (All posts soley represent my own opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Actually, they do. But why should that matter? All they have to do is be blackmailed, or incentivized with buccho mega millions of dollars. So, seriously, what does it matter?


66 posted on 11/04/2020 7:05:34 PM PST by nfldgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: philippa

And add to that what James OKeefe and Project Veritas just posted about faudulent postmarking of those same late Nov 4th ballots


67 posted on 11/04/2020 7:06:41 PM PST by time4good
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: R_Kangel

I hope that is correct


68 posted on 11/04/2020 7:06:52 PM PST by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

“Could get ALL hand-stamped ballots thrown out in contested states, since USPS is federal.”

Assuming the envelopes still exist. Then, how to connect a ballot to its corresponding envelope.

Need to hold re-elections in the cheating states with U.S. Marshalls running the show in every state.


69 posted on 11/04/2020 7:08:22 PM PST by MayflowerMadam (Liberty over lock-downs. Freedom over face masks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: lightman

So the PA AG won’t respond to SCOTUS???


70 posted on 11/04/2020 7:08:28 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel (No weapon formed agMainst me shall prosper! (Isaiah 54:17))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Norski

Praying with you Norski.


71 posted on 11/04/2020 7:11:11 PM PST by Exit148
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

What??? They told them no???


72 posted on 11/04/2020 7:13:52 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel (No weapon formed agMainst me shall prosper! (Isaiah 54:17))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: dpetty121263

73 posted on 11/04/2020 7:14:57 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hope is not a plan. -- Matthew Bracken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

“...So the PA AG won’t respond to SCOTUS???...”

He’s a Soros bought and paid for meat puppet named Josh Shapiro.

A typical democrat piece of sh*t. He may or may or not respond. And if he doesn’t respond, I’d say Trump should send federal marshals to drag his ass out of his home at 3am Roger Stone style.


74 posted on 11/04/2020 7:18:31 PM PST by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

I saw several items listed when I search ‘election’ in the docket search, so I could have picked the wrong item.


75 posted on 11/04/2020 7:21:49 PM PST by Spirit of Liberty (It's morning in America again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

I never heard the term “reality bubble”. What is it, and what is the context in SCOTUS?


76 posted on 11/04/2020 7:38:06 PM PST by MayflowerMadam (Liberty over lock-downs. Freedom over face masks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: funfan
Well those ballots were mixed in I believe because the election person who told the SC they would keep the ballots that came in after November 3rd separate went back on her word. I guess they can have a new election then.

Seems like the only solution.

77 posted on 11/04/2020 7:39:10 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dpetty121263

Anyone seen the DOJ? Do we even have a DOJ anymore?


78 posted on 11/04/2020 7:44:20 PM PST by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wildcard_redneck; dpetty121263

Yes indeed, because the AG and the soros SOS independent of the PA Legislature (who has demanded the SOS resign, BTW, today by the leaders of both houses PA Legislature)— decided to MIX together the ballots received up to Nov 3, and those now arriving.

Thus, the perfectly legal option (equal treatment under the law to other states who have not followed any such scheme)—is to throw out ALL the mixed ballots that cannot be distinguished (and not allow them to provide some “secret” identifiers/markers to re-sort. Just invalidate all of them).
The election count then remains as per the PA Legislature’s voting Statutes-— as it should have been, and the PA supreme courts unconstitutional (federally) changing of election law is vacated— cancelled. The count remains as all the votes to Nov. 3rd and other original PA Statutes as they should be followed.


79 posted on 11/04/2020 7:48:34 PM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: wildcard_redneck

The PA AG is a cocky bastard, bragging about he’s 6-0 with the courts....about to lose the only one that counts.


80 posted on 11/04/2020 7:48:50 PM PST by chiller (Davey Crockett said: "Be sure you're right. Then go ahead'. I'm going ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson