Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dpetty121263

What Supreme Court?


3 posted on 11/04/2020 6:05:27 PM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bonemaker

US Supreme Court.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-574.html


6 posted on 11/04/2020 6:07:39 PM PST by Spirit of Liberty (It's morning in America again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Bonemaker

had to glance at the article, magine that

“”” The lawsuit takes issue with a state Supreme Court ruling that postmarked ballots be presumed to have been mailed before Nov. 3, even if not clearly postmarked to that effect.”””

US supreme court evidently


8 posted on 11/04/2020 6:08:19 PM PST by Pollard (You can’t be for “defunding the police” and against “vigilantism” at the same time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Bonemaker

SCOTUS


10 posted on 11/04/2020 6:08:32 PM PST by ripnbang ("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man, a subject.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Bonemaker

The Supreme Court ordered Pennsylvania Democrats to respond by Thursday evening in a case challenging the state’s three-day extension for counting mail-in ballots.

President Trump has moved to intervene in a lawsuit brought by Pennsylvania Republicans, arguing the state’s Democratic Party and Secretary of State violated the law by extending the time for counting mail-in ballots to Nov. 6 at 5 p.m., despite the state legislature setting the deadline as Election Day.

The lawsuit takes issue with a state Supreme Court ruling that postmarked ballots be presumed to have been mailed before Nov. 3, even if not clearly postmarked to that effect.
“This is an open invitation to voters to cast their ballots after Election Day, thereby injecting chaos and the potential for gamesmanship into what had been an orderly and secure schedule of clear, bright-line deadlines,” the Republicans argued.

According to the court’s docket, the justices want the state’s officials and Democratic Party to respond before Friday’s ballot-counting deadline.

“Response to motion for leave to intervene requested, due Thursday, November 5, 2020, by 5 p.m.,” the docket read.


39 posted on 11/04/2020 6:27:28 PM PST by 3161J410 (Election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Bonemaker

Dianna Ross, Mary Wilson, Florence Ballard and Barbara Martin? Those Supremes?


150 posted on 11/05/2020 11:25:31 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (JOBS NOT MOBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson