Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TChad

Hmm, that says electors not voters. Isn’t that different?


49 posted on 11/10/2020 7:09:30 PM PST by Pining_4_TX (I'm old enough to remember when you actually had to be able to do something to be hired to do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Pining_4_TX
Hmm, that says electors not voters. Isn’t that different?

It seems odd to me too, but in context the only definition of "elector" that makes sense in this statute is "voter." The statute refers to presidential electors specifically as presidential electors.

Legalese is not quite English.

55 posted on 11/10/2020 7:47:00 PM PST by TChad (The MSM, having nuked its own credibility, is now bombing the rubble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson