Posted on 11/18/2020 6:40:13 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Although the poorly documented, sudden appearance, of thousands of "Biden" ballots may appear to be fraud, it's not proof.
And in any event, they're mixed in with the full ballot pool, and can't be disentangled.
Or can they?
Let's consider the dumping scenario. Due to the limited time frame required to falsify ballots, it's likely that only a limited number of people participated.
So what does this mean? It means that :
(1) the same sets of fingerprints should appear on multiple ballots (likely in the same place(s) on the ballot), and
(2) these identifiers won't match known voting ballot handlers (eg election workers or ballot manufacturers). If this is found to be true, then the most likely explanation for this is ballot tampering.
Thus, most, if not all, of such ballots can be shown to be fraudulent, even if the culprits are never identified. And a significant fraction of these fake ballots can be determined and counted.
This is real evidence. And a large number should be sufficient for court intervention in support of "spoilation".
Has ballot fingerprinting been used? Apparently so. The Alaska Division of Elections is apparently investigating a case dating to 2018.
Is it possible to test all of the ballots? This would likely be impractical. But testing those with certain suspicious characteristics should be straightforward. For example, all ballots with only one check (for president) would be a big flag. One might expect a few, but not a large number. The Benford test might support another flag.
High speed optical scanning of a few thousand carefully selected ballots should be enough to detect a pattern of fraud. And this quantity is consistent with precedent. Pennsylvania considered a ballot of 400 random ballots as sufficient for an audit of their June primary.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
agreed
Interesting, but I’m not sure 400 is enough given creativity & motivation of underminers to process.
I think the fraud is the mail out but not returned ballots being harvested. Reprinted in house and filled out. Postage counts both sending and receiving then compared to voter updates with date time stamps. Lots were collected without postage, signatures, etc. but they had to have been printed and not mailed out. so the postage counts egual the number of mail-out votes and the print logs show more ballots printed than mailed out.
Yeah, I wonder if many/most of the fraud ballots were reprinted as copies from a single original since they were done in a hurried fashion. If so, there should be an easy means to distinguish one from another — type offset, printing askew, paper quality/type, etc.
I’m all for the blue ink method. When you vote you dip your thumb in blue ink AND leave a print on your ballot! Its shows 1) That you already voted and 2) leaves proof of your vote on your ballot!
Touch DNA, too. Not practical, though.
There are two questions that we must be asking:
1) Was there fraud in this election?
2) Was the fraud massive and sufficient to hand the election to Joe Biden?
Here’s the thing — Evidence is CUMULATIVE — The Dead Voting, Statistical improbability, Dominion Software moving votes from Trump to Biden, hundreds of sworn testimonies, newly discovered discarded ballots by the thousands, etc. — ALL OF THEM FAVORING BIDEN.
So, in regards to the first question — ABSOLUTELY.
So, In regards to the second question: Was the fraud sufficient to hand the election to Joe Biden?
*THAT* is extremely difficult to prove short of a statewide AUDIT.
The one factor that has the potential to shift votes by the hundreds of thousands from Biden to Trump is the software used to tabulate the votes. Sidney Powell has been on top of this from the get go.... she better deliver because answering the second question very tough.
The evidence presented has to be SOLID ENOUGH to justify state wide audits and recounts ( re-vote even ).
The fraud is perpetrated by democrats. The polls are run by democrats. The counting is done by democrats. The judges ruling on recounts are democrats. The arguments against recounts are given by democrats. Republicans tend to just say, “ok, i guess it’s ok”.
You make good points. And I would probably expect our court system to set a high bar for proof that the fraud was massive enough to make a difference.
But in terms of real justice, it seems to me that if you can verify that one party cheated in a gazillion different ways (and I think this is easy to verify) then I don’t see why quantity should really matter.
Let’s say Joe won a state by 20,000 votes. And then we verify that 15,000 of those votes were bogus. Okay. So what? Joe still won the state, right? He’s got 5000 more votes! But did you find ALL of the fraud? It’s like proving a negative. You cannot be sure you found all of the fraud. Maybe you missed 10,000 additional bogus ballots. Maybe Trump won the state by 5000 votes.
I’m not really comfortable with a court decision which basically says, “Yeah, Biden cheated his ass off. Hoo boy! Never seen such cheating in all my life. But, [shrug] it probably didn’t really matter. He probably really won anyway. So, we’ll just let his little plan succeed.”
That’s not justice.
Every printer leaves a unique mark. Should be easy to identify copied ballots. I hope the Rats didn’t know this
But we are running out of time
BOOM!!! Heads on pikes!!!
What could possibly go wrong?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.