[Fido969]

This is Rudy’s lawsuit. Can someone summarize it for me?

[glimmerman70]

Can they change anything before it goes to Supreme Court or does it have to be the same case. I am sure presented the same case and evidence that he did in the Republican senate for PA. You would think that would have been enough.

[thinden]

fast track to supreme court

[tired&retired]

Am I missing something?

Is Rudy not presenting convincing evidence or are the judged afraid to rule on this explosive case?

I don’t understand.

[gw-ington]

Meanwhile, the Democrat Party Cabal (DPC) continues relentlessly ramping up the pressure against President Trump to "Concede, concede, concede, concede, concede, ..."

Democrat Party Cabal (DPC) Member in Action: Here's a typical example of what just one of the DPC's members is perpetrating: Do a YouTube search regarding the election by searching for one or more of these terms: "Trump," "Biden," "Pence," "Kamala," or "election." If the video was uploaded to YouTube after Election Day, you'll automatically get the following disclaimer injected just below the YouTube video's title: "U.S. elections The AP has called the Presidential race for Joe Biden. See more on Google. [SHOW ME] Robust safeguards help ensure the integrity of elections and results. [Learn More]"

Go ahead, try out that YouTube test and easily prove to yourself that the DPC member, YouTube/Google/Alphabet, is constantly and deceitfully brainwashing you 24/7 into falsely thinking that Sleepy Joe Basement-Biden is the supposed President-Elect.

[FreeReign]

Supposedly it was a very narrow lawsuit, done that way on purpose.

I haven't seen the suit, so I don't know.

[KKDucMan]

I must be missing something. I don’t understand how President Trump could allow a lawsuit to be filed with “no allegations and no proof”.

[blueunicorn6]

One of “THE TESTS OF TRUTH” is:

Agreement With Experience

Kamala Harris had a rally in Las Vegas where nobody, NOBODY, showed up.

Biden had rallies where a couple of dozen people showed up.

Yet, the Biden Harris ticket received 80,000,000 votes?

This does not agree with experience.

It is a violation of THE TESTS OF TRUTH.

The claim that Biden received 80,000,000 votes is a LIE.

[moviefan8]

I really don’t think the courts want to get involved in deciding an election. Trump is going to lose.

[Guenevere]

Bttt

[Paladin2]

Proof is difficult to obtain when the Fraud Perpetrators are deep-sixing the evidence with the courts providing cover..

[servantboy777]

I believe the Trump team wanted to plead their case before the SCOTUS...am I wrong?

[JohnnyP]

“ Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”
What would have happened if Rudy had said “ Your honor, I have here 100 affidavits of witnesses to election fraud. May I present them in evidence to this court, and if not, who will hear this evidence?

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

If Biden somehow gets in, then the rule of law and voting means absolutely nothing. We will officially be a 3rd-world country and I’ll be taking proactive measures accordingly.

[Bullish]

Good. Let’s get this to where it needs to be.

[depressed in 06]

Will the Sniffer concede?

[gw-ington]

From the Appeals Court ruling: "Most of the claims in the Second Amended Complaint boil down to issues of state law. But Pennsylvania law is willing to overlook many technical defects. It favors counting votes as long as there is no fraud. Indeed, the Campaign has already litigated and lost many of these issues in state courts ... its allegations are vague and conclusory. It never alleges that anyone treated the Trump campaign or Trump votes worse than it treated the Biden campaign or Biden votes. And federal law does not require poll watchers or specify how they may observe. It also says nothing about curing technical state-law errors in ballots. Each of these defects is fatal, and the proposed Second Amended Complaint does not fix them. So the District Court properly denied leave to amend again. Nor does the Campaign deserve an injunction to undo Pennsylvania’s certification of its votes. The Campaign’s claims have no merit. The number of ballots it specifically challenges is far smaller than the roughly 81,000-vote margin of victory. And it never claims fraud or that any votes were cast by illegal voters. Plus, tossing out millions of mail-in ballots would be drastic and unprecedented, disenfranchising a huge swath of the electorate and upsetting all down-ballot races too. That remedy would be grossly disproportionate to the procedural challenges raised. So we deny the motion for an injunction pending appeal." [NOTE: I added underlines for emphasis.]

[Steve_Seattle]

"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."

It was my understanding that the filings offered numerous specific allegations, along with affidavits supporting them. As for proof, I thought that was supposed to be determined in a full hearing, not simply in the filings.

[jmclemore]

Failing forward toward to the SCOTUS trying to outrun a deadline....

[maxwellsmart_agent]

And now you can see clearly why the democrats fought tooth and nail to try to prevent Amy Coney Barrett from being seated on the Supreme Court. She wll counter liberal Justice John Roberts and swing the Supreme Court to the conservative side for a change.