Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/27/2020 1:09:41 PM PST by gattaca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: gattaca

This is clearly a fraudulent election of Biden and everyone knows it. We’ll have to fight, there’s little question about that. It’s a matter of how thoroughly we can clear this rot from the system and how long it’s going to take.


46 posted on 11/27/2020 2:01:36 PM PST by jacknhoo ( Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gattaca

I thought a major part of this case, and what will be heard by SCOTUS, was that SOS acted illegally by allowing absentee and mail in ballots to come in three days after the election and other issues not approved by the legislature. When do these items get addressed because those votes are in the hundreds of thousands or at least that was my understanding.


47 posted on 11/27/2020 2:01:44 PM PST by Abbeville Conservative (Preventing the theft of the 2020 Presidential Election is that hill we've talked about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gattaca; Impy; BillyBoy; NFHale; GOPsterinMA; LS; campaignPete R-CT; AuH2ORepublican; Clemenza; ...
"Judge Stephanos Bibas wrote on behalf of the three-judge panel that reviewed the appeal, "Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy."

This moron doesn't even know what form of government we are.

49 posted on 11/27/2020 2:02:31 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (DEFEAT THE COUP D'ETAT BY THE STALINAZI DERP STATE !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gattaca

The basis of the lawsuit had NOTHING to say about being “UNFAIR”... the signing statement ruling by the 3 judge panel is COMPLETELY INACCURATE. What the suit had was hundreds of affadavits, as well as the UnConstitutional basis of the conduct of the Election as PA ran it— DISALLOWS the election under the US Constitution.
It also cites MANY precedents for the basis of the claim in prior elections. And it had STANDING.

The Appeals Court had NO idea the Constitutionality of their Ruling. It is not Constitutional at all, and neither was PA Elections.


50 posted on 11/27/2020 2:05:26 PM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gattaca
The Federalist Society strikes again! I don't want to hear anyone get angry because people take issue with them. They have repeatedly thrown out the president's cases, these people do not deserve a monopoly on judicial appointments!
51 posted on 11/27/2020 2:05:43 PM PST by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gattaca

I’m just wondering how many times this will be posted.


53 posted on 11/27/2020 2:06:26 PM PST by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gattaca

This was a unanimous 3-0 appeals court ruling with 3 federal judges appointed by Republican Presidents. The judge who wrote the opinion was a Trump appointee, Judge Stephanos Bibas.
Very disappointing.


54 posted on 11/27/2020 2:06:32 PM PST by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gattaca

What the hell is up with the wording of these decisions?

They are basically saying “The evidence of fraud you presented is not evidence of fraud”


63 posted on 11/27/2020 2:18:56 PM PST by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gattaca

“But Giuliani offered little tangible evidence to fortify his claims.”

Rudy had lots of evidence at the PA Senate hearing. Are we supposed to believe he didn’t present any to the appeals court?

BS.


70 posted on 11/27/2020 2:24:08 PM PST by CottonBall (COVID -1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fatima; Fresh Wind; st.eqed; xsmommy; House Atreides; Nowhere Man; PaulZe; brityank; Physicist; ...

Pennsylvania Ping!

Please ping me with articles of interest.

FReepmail me to be added to the list.

82 posted on 11/27/2020 2:38:49 PM PST by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gattaca

“ The Campaign asked for a very fast briefing schedule, and we have granted its request. Because the Campaign wants us to move as fast as possible, we also deny oral argument. We grant all motions to file overlength responses, to file amicus briefs, and to supplement appendices. We deny all other outstanding motions as moot.”


85 posted on 11/27/2020 2:40:03 PM PST by Danette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gattaca

no problemo


100 posted on 11/27/2020 3:05:07 PM PST by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gattaca

There is a theory..bottom line they have to get to the Supreme Court... but have to through the lowers courts first as fast as possible ..so to do that.. they are sand bagging in the lower courts so they can appeal

The Supreme Court is the only court that going to overturn this election the got to make it there before the Electoral College meet...


106 posted on 11/27/2020 3:43:37 PM PST by tophat9000 (Tophat9000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson