“The sole Constitutional remedy and the only one in keeping with the inherent federal nature of our legal order is that any remedy is limited to the state’s own court system and legislature, and it’s just nobody else’s business, including SCOTUS.”
LOL, are you serious? You are saying that no matter what a State official or officials do to cheat, steal or otherwise game an election it can ONLY be remedied by the State? They investigate (or not) themselves, declare all ok and proceed with the theft, evidence to the contrary such as no post marked ballots and other violations of the laws the State already had on the books be damned?
Show me in the Constitution where it say the States can make the rules for elections and then violate them at will without getting the Legislature involved?
It wasn't "political question" as I had thought but rather "standing" which strikes me as ridiculous. SCOTUS is saying that TX had no cognizable interest in rampant voter fraud in places like Philly and Detroit that clearly inflicted a false Presidency on the voters of TX. Of course TX had standing. Alito is right about that.
But anyway, SCOTUS punted as expected so we'll never know their opinion about whether this is a non-justiciable "political question."
It's looking grim.