It is racist the reject fraud
ALL should object, the fraud was undeniable.
Aw, shaddup Linda! You are a duplicitous snake.
Should be fun to recuse the newly-seated Senators who were elected using SmartMatic software in the ESS, Dominion, DieBold, etc., voting systems.
What has been tried in federal court? Every case has been dismissed without hearing the merits.
Every non-Democrat controlled State should also reject the results and declare DNC an outlaw party.
People of color who voted for Trump, including Dem Trump supporters, had their votes switched or dumped, too....
Note to the both parties: Aid and abet the disenfranchisement of these people of color at your political peril.
If dead people were voting, I want the names,”
So you can ignore them? Names have been given. You and the rest run and hide.
Damned well best be every last one of the GOP voting NOT to accept this Voter Fraud.
The Bulwark is basically The Weekly Standard, but more left-wing. Sounds like a grift targeted at squeezing out donations from lefty plutocrats:
Following the end of publication of The Weekly Standard in December 2018,[5] editor-in-chief Charlie Sykes said: “the murder of the Standard made it urgently necessary to create a home for rational, principled, fact-based center-right voices who were not cowed by Trumpism.”[6] The site was created in December 2018 as a news aggregator as a project of the Defending Democracy Together Institute, a 501(c)(3) conservative advocacy group led in part by Weekly Standard co-founder William Kristol,[7] who was a prominent voice pushing for the U.S. invasion of Iraq.[8][9] Several former editors and writers of The Weekly Standard soon joined the staff and within weeks of launch began publishing original news and opinion pieces. CNN reported in January 2019 that approximately $1 million had already been raised for the site, which was said to be adequate to keep the site running for one year but that additional funding was being sought.[4]
A podcast hosted by Sykes and executive editor Jonathan V. Last was launched on December 21, 2018.[10]
Ideology
Despite the initial editorial makeup of The Bulwark being largely from the coalition of neoconservatives and libertarians that wrote Weekly Standard, the website’s intense opposition to the administration of Donald Trump over time brought it to a more centrist stance on balance, including liberal commentators alongside the more conventional conservatism that held sway in the Republican Party from the 1950s to the mid-2010s.[citation needed] It is opposed to populist expressions of conservatism and traditionalism, particularly as expressed by Trump-aligned politicians and pundits as well as earlier exponents of those ideologies such as Pat Buchanan and Samuel T. Francis.[citation needed] ]
It doesn’t matter how many GOP vote for it, it only matters how many Dems are going to vote for it since they have the majority in the House.
Kinzinger is a snake in the grass.
L
It has to be done
This is great!
However, we need ALL with a conscience to STAND UP AGAINST THIS FRAUD AND ACT OF WAR.
TRUMP WON LEGALLY!!!!!!!
ANYTHING after the cease in counting was WAR AND IT NEEDS TO BE VOIDED!!!
To the Honorable Senator Graham:
This is not about “overturning” the election results in any state. It is about correcting a fraudulent count that came via criminal activity.
In other words, you would be restoring law, order, and the ACTUAL results of the election.
Regards
I worry about any senators who say they are going to object. It’s a given that some representatives will but they also need at least one senator. I hope none of them have pacemakers or defibrillators. The bad guys have shown their ability to compromise them remotely.
... it would be hard for me to basically take over the federal courts' role ...
The usual pass the buck scheme that all three branches use to get over on the people.
The US government has ZERO moral legitimacy. It is a pox on the people and is outside of its constitutional boundaries. Schumucks like Lindsey Graham are part of the problem. Abdication of responsibility because "it's not my role," and when it is his role, the evidence is inadequate or the remedy is weak, and so goes the beat.
Nobody is OVERTURNING any election. How do you "overturn" a fake election that was crooked from top to bottom and not in accord with state laws? You can make an extremely strong case that an election was NOT even held in the six "battleground" states with rampant fraud. This is restoration of justice.
Damn him...useless as ever.