Posted on 01/09/2021 3:39:06 PM PST by NImerc
As Big Tech draws a social media wall of silence around President Donald Trump, reports indicate that one of the Trump campaign’s email service providers has distanced itself from the president.
According to a string of Twitter postings from Dave Lee, a correspondent for the Financial Times, an email provider called Campaign Monitor had suspended the campaign’s account as of Thursday.
A statement from the company confirmed the account had been suspended, but did not indicate the reason.
(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalistpapers.org ...
You trust the post office?
Had you been getting emails from the President prior to this?
___________________________________________
I’m not trying to be a jerk or anything, but how is that relevant.
Had you been getting emails from the President prior to this?
“You trust the post office?”
not really, but you take what you can get.
As of today, who treats Trump supporters better, Post Office or TWTR et al ?
He has the Emergency Broadcast System. For right now, that is all he needs. 8>)
Well, the reason is too obvious for them to bother to explain: they support the authoritarian suppression of dissent as you saw in the Soviet Union and see today in Communist China. The left has simply decided to wage all-out war against the Bill of Rights and basic freedoms to amass more control, because fundamentally that is what leftism is about. I hope everyone on our side realizes how serious the Dems’ embrace of authoritarian tactics and open oppression is.
Exactly. They’re emboldened and maximizing their opportunity.
and make them part of the Post Office
No way. 8>)
We don’t know why, so what’s the point? Could be some normal closing of an account.
The Nazis stole Georgia and they are now on a roll. Literally getting away with murder. This is Obama’s Banana Republic now. “Armed insurrection” my ass. If that was an “armed insurrection” the horseshit we’ve had to put up with from the Black Looters Movement and Aunt Teefah for the entire year of 2020 was a nuclear attack. Remember, these bozos in the democrats’ “media” are all high on drugs. The same morons who think all pistols are “glocks” and all long rifles are “assault weapons.” Real braindead college dropout meatballs.
Prof. Jonathan Turley posted an Opinion in The Hill. He concluded that the President’s speech to the crowd was within the ambit of protected First Amendment speech. Even though the Professor believes the President could have been more temperate in his remarks, the speech did not incite violence by the crowd. Turley wrote the Opinion as a warning to the Democrats (and probably the weak-kneed Republicans) not to proceed with a “snap impeachment” since it will detract from the seriousness of such a proceeding as envisioned by the drafters of the Constitution and set a bad precedent for the future. No doubt his warning will be ignored.
Well I'll explain.
If indeed Trump's email had been "suspended", then that would
effect those who are in email contact with the President.
It would NOT effect those who do not have email contact with the President.
I sure hope that clears things up for you.
Remember when President Trump unconstitutionally sent all of his political opponents into a digital gulag for crossing him?
Yeah, I don’t either.
The beautiful thing about early internet protocols like email is that nobody actually needs an email service provider. You can just set up your own and nobody will know the difference.
That’s what I’ve been saying...declare them public utlities like phones, gas, electric. That’ll never happen though because democrats will control the government forever now.
Scared? They’re opening a bottle of champagne.
At this stage of the game all communication should be over military infrastructure. If that’s not a available then it’s out of President Trump’s hands.
They are very nervous about things. But it isn’t the dopey Reichstag LARP.
The post office messed around with ballots. It messed with campaign flyers. I trust ups and fed ex before usps.
Well, the article mentioned that it was an email address that connected him to “his supporters”, so it sound like more than just an email used for narrow government business.
I mean I could be wrong, but the article made it sound like this is cutting him off from no small group of people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.