Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Tom Carper Announces Bill To Give D.C. Statehood
OAN ^ | Jan 27 | OAN Newsroom

Posted on 01/27/2021 1:51:55 PM PST by RandFan

Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.) introduces a bill aimed at making Washington D.C. a state.

Carper took to Twitter Wednesday to discuss his efforts to “give the over 700,000 D.C. residents a voice, vote and full representation in Congress.”

The so-called ‘Washington D.C. Admissions Act‘ has received support from several members of the Democrat party. However, Republicans are concerned making D.C. a state will place two more Democrats in the Senate.

Democrats would need at least 60 votes in the upper chamber to pass the proposal, but they may only need a simple majority if the filibuster is abolished.

(Excerpt) Read more at oann.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: carper; dc; statehood; tomcarper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

1 posted on 01/27/2021 1:51:55 PM PST by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Unconstitutional, but whatever.


2 posted on 01/27/2021 1:52:36 PM PST by KC_Lion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Ugh!


3 posted on 01/27/2021 1:52:59 PM PST by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Want representation? Easy Peary.

Return the land to Maryland just as some has been returned to Virginia.

Problem solved.


4 posted on 01/27/2021 1:53:18 PM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

“Unconstitutional, but whatever.”

The constitution no longer matters. Even the SCOTUS doesn’t worry much about that.


5 posted on 01/27/2021 1:53:35 PM PST by brownsfan (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

“Unconstitutional, but whatever.”

The constitution no longer matters. Even the SCOTUS doesn’t worry much about that.


6 posted on 01/27/2021 1:53:35 PM PST by brownsfan (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

F - that!

More democrat malarkey.


7 posted on 01/27/2021 1:54:57 PM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> --- )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Statehood of china?


8 posted on 01/27/2021 1:55:44 PM PST by patriot torch (Ashlie Babbitt-say her name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

TOTALLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL


9 posted on 01/27/2021 1:56:03 PM PST by Regulator (It's Fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Let Texas and Hawaii secede and you get to pick two welfare leeching states to make up for them.


10 posted on 01/27/2021 1:56:39 PM PST by BipolarBob (USA - Born July 4, 1776. Died Jan. 20, 2021 in the Year of our Covid - a new error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

And, here comes the “overwhelm the system” strategy, straight out of Rules for Radicals.

Hit “the system” with such an unbelievable, overwhelming amount of </explitive_deleted> and the whole thing will crash.

THAT is their plan. And unless our so-called “leaders” WAKE. UP. and start to realize that we are under an attack like this country has never seen before, the bad guys may just succeed.


11 posted on 01/27/2021 1:57:54 PM PST by jstolzen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
YAWN

They don't have the votes without nuking the filibuster, and they don't have the votes to nuke the filibuster. Manchin and Sinema have already outright stated they won't nuke the filibuster for D.C. statehood.

12 posted on 01/27/2021 1:59:02 PM PST by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

What took him so long? Patently against the Constitution. 10 square miles etc....


13 posted on 01/27/2021 2:00:48 PM PST by Don Corleone (The truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
Even the SCOTUS doesn’t worry much about that.

Andrew Cuomo has already set the stage: The Supreme Court is no longer relevant.

14 posted on 01/27/2021 2:02:13 PM PST by ptsal (Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion
Unconstitutional, but whatever.

They can probably get around that by carving out the Mall, the Capitol, and the White House and leaving that under the control of Congress and making everything else a state.

15 posted on 01/27/2021 2:02:47 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Return the non-federal property and neighborhoods to DC.


16 posted on 01/27/2021 2:03:15 PM PST by Reno89519 (Buy American, Hire American! End All Worker Visa Programs. Replace Visa Workers w/ American Worker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Look at section 224 of HR1 - it explicitly provides for amending the Constitution. That is not a simple process of a majority vote, so a simple majority vote here shouldn’t do the trick.


17 posted on 01/27/2021 2:04:43 PM PST by theoilpainter (but, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
Article 1, Section 8

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings

This one is vague enough on what can be done with the district that a Supreme Court challenge is definitely necessary. The problematic phrase: "To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District" would seemingly be a roadblock for any local authority to have jurisdiction over the Federal government's responsibility to exercise legislative authority over the district.

Of course, that Constitution thing never stopped a Democrat...

18 posted on 01/27/2021 2:06:06 PM PST by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

They would be foolish to nuke the filibuster over this, as statehood for DC requires a constitutional amendment, as provided for by the dems own proposed legislation.


19 posted on 01/27/2021 2:06:42 PM PST by theoilpainter (but, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

See the 23rd Amendment.


20 posted on 01/27/2021 2:07:21 PM PST by theoilpainter (but, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson