To: Incorrigible
Whew. That is a relief. It’s a good thing seas never get over 20’ in height.
2 posted on
03/10/2021 9:55:30 AM PST by
Rebelbase
To: Incorrigible
Did Master Xi approve this?
3 posted on
03/10/2021 9:55:33 AM PST by
brownsfan
(Term limits! Without term limits, we are doomed.)
To: Incorrigible
Hope the navy has the ballast calculations worked out.
4 posted on
03/10/2021 9:56:46 AM PST by
ptsal
(Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
To: Incorrigible
What was once old is new again!.................
5 posted on
03/10/2021 9:58:34 AM PST by
Red Badger
("We've always been at war with Climate Change, Winston."..............................)
To: Incorrigible
Nothing wrong with the design (except cost). Now, if someone could just figure out how to fit a working gun on it.
7 posted on
03/10/2021 10:01:45 AM PST by
PAR35
To: Incorrigible
Elmo would be disappointed.
11 posted on
03/10/2021 10:05:20 AM PST by
moovova
(Yo GOP....we won't forget.)
To: Incorrigible
This puppy would take some seas that would make your heart stop. Spent some serious roller coaster time in the North Sea, Cape of Good Hope, and Cape Horn -- along with a nasty hurricane in the Atlantic. It did all of this with a crack across the O-1 deck (later replaced with an expansion joint on newer vessels). Walking on the walls, eating cold food, and watching breakers wash down the passageways added to the excitement...
To: Incorrigible
Yeah, but a deployed ship will eventually face 40ft seas.
15-20ft is not a valid test.
19 posted on
03/10/2021 11:03:18 AM PST by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: Incorrigible
20 posted on
03/10/2021 11:06:57 AM PST by
Lurker
(Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is. )
To: Incorrigible
I’m glad the Zumwalt appears to be sea-worthy and is “stealthy.” It nevertheless remains a butt-ugly looking ship.
22 posted on
03/10/2021 11:11:16 AM PST by
Towed_Jumper
(When you're standing on the edge of a cliff, a "giant step forward" is NOT progress.)
To: Incorrigible
Not to rag on the military, but they seem to have long thrown away the KISS principle. Few and incredibly expensive projects, while simple, fast and relatively inexpensive projects ended with WWII.
I bet Trump could have had 20 destroyers designed, built, tested and deployed in 10 years for that same amount of money.
27 posted on
03/10/2021 11:27:55 AM PST by
wastedyears
(The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
To: Incorrigible
I’m so old that only destroyers that have done everything in battle and very often survived are worth talking about...
The Fletcher class destroyer was the toughest fighting, non-aircraft-carrier, ship ever built...
They were a tribute to an America (a patriotic population and a manufacturing base that no longer exists) that could mass produce those babies in shipyards everywhere...
My mother was trained as a welder and worked (12 hours a day, 6-days a week) on their construction during the war... She was also a war casualty, as the rest of her short post-war life was spent fighting illnesses caused by the working conditions...
43 posted on
03/10/2021 12:41:45 PM PST by
SuperLuminal
(Where is Joe McCarthy now that we desperately need him sober?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson