Gee, that sounds just a little bit suspicious.
Is the translation for “too sensational and impure the public” that the judge is in the documents?
Just how does the general public know for sure the data is “impure?”
I have a hard time finding “impure” in the criminal statutes.
At this point, let’s get all the dirty laundry out on the table and expose it to the cleansing light of day and a good thorough scrubbing in soapy water.
What can be sensational or impure in a nation that allows human trafficking and allows the unborn to be murdered in abortion mills?