Posted on 04/05/2021 2:58:05 PM PDT by Kaslin
A friend asked recently how anyone who supports the right-wing in Israel could advocate for anything other than two right of center parties headed by Naftali Bennett and Gideon Sa’ar to join a government led by the Likud party with Benjamin Netanyahu remaining as Prime Minister. Combined with the two ultra-Orthodox parties and a further right-wing party, they could (easily) form a solid, stable, right-wing coalition, per what my friend posited, is the will of the majority of Israelis.
This comes in light of deliberations and negotiations going on as to who will form the next government, with an understanding that all three of these leaders would have to make significant compromises to create or join such a coalition. The premise of the question is that the voters for (all) these parties are of the same mindset and want a right-wing government, above all. I have a different view.
I'm right of center, I voted for Gidon Sa’ar’s New Hope Party last month, and Likud every election prior except one. I want any Israeli government to be, or have, a solid right of center orientation, however not necessarily above all. I voted for Sa’ar because I very much believe that it’s time for a change at the top and I believe that Saar is the only one committed to that. Prime Minister Netanyahu has done a world of good for Israel in many ways. This cannot be diminished or dismissed. But, after 15 years, I believe it’s time for him to step aside, or be replaced.
By voting for Ra’am, a good portion of Israeli Arabs voted for change in their own communities as well. We should facilitate and embrace that. If we’ve crossed the point of no return, and Israeli Arab parties are no longer reflexively hostile to being part of and support the government, and for the bulk of Israeli Jews that’s no longer a red line, that’s a good thing. Indeed, even with an Islamist party, there can be common issues that resonate with a traditional Jewish audience.
However, the question is whether the Muslim Brotherhood affiliated Ra’am Party is the Arab hope that Israel, Arabs and Jews, needs, or is it just the flavor-of-the-month? Ra’am’s charter calls for the “right of return for Palestinian refugees,” says “there can be no allegiance” to Israel, and calls Zionism a “racist, occupying project.” Not very embracing if you’re a Jewish Israeli.
According to a Times of Israel article, the Ra’am charter states, “The State of Israel was born of the racist, occupying Zionist project; iniquitous Western and British imperialism; and the debasement and feebleness of the Arab and Islamic [nations]. We do not absolve ourselves, the Palestinian people, of our responsibility and our failure to confront this project.”
Many Israelis won’t object to Ra’am’s advocating for a “two-state solution” with a Palestinian state established “alongside Israel.” But many Israelis are opposed to the call to destroy Israeli communities in the “West Bank,” and resist a division of Jerusalem. For most, Ra’am’s option to establish a single bi-national state is an anathema.
Recently, Ra’am has avoided discussing these and other controversial issues. Party leader Mansour Abbas held an unprecedented primetime address aired live on every major TV station. This was received with what was termed courageous pragmatism, but lacked substance on issues that Israelis who favor greater Arab involvement want to know about. Highlighting the uncertainty, Ra’am Knesset member Walid Taha noted, “We have stances, but now is not the time.”
Their charter says, “Our political participation, on all its levels, from local government to the legislative authority in parliament, and in official civil authorities, is but an attempt to defend our rights and the interests of our Arab Palestinian community inside [Israel], and to aid our Palestinian cause, and to clash with the proposals and policies and programs of the Zionist project from within the heart of the state institutions.”
Has Ra’am turned a corner? Is it willing to support a government now for practical reasons, or is the lack of discussion of the controversial issues a form of deliberate deception, taqiyya, which is sanctioned in Islam to gain the trust and ultimately defeat others?
The support and even inclusion of an Arab party in the establishment of an Israeli government is not by definition a bad thing. It could be very good. Yet time will tell as to who may be able to form a government now, whether Ra’am will be part of the equation, and to what end, or whether Israel will be heading to another election later this year.
Maybe the author is correct, but the decision has to be Israel's not ours.
Without commenting on the merits of the argument here, I would just point out that there are good reasons why potential jurors are excluded from juries when they have close personal knowledge about a case which they might be asked to judge.
ML/NJ
Three batteries won't impact our problems vs China, even if sent to Taiwan. Will impact the Saudis, who should be looking elsewhere for arms.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.