[Impala64ssa]

ASSuming she's sincere, good for her. It takes a lot to own up to a mistake. Frankly I thought it would be more likely for Rachel Madcow to admit Russia gate was a hoax, than anyone from the Young JERKS to admit a mistake. The DA had so much invested in the "one armed bandit" Grosskreutz. What a shame

[NWFree]

Like I would ever rely on a libtard for accurate information in the first place 🤪

[E. Pluribus Unum]

[JonPreston]

Hey Kasparian, now do Brandon!

[Neanderthal]

Is there any info on the makeup of the jury in this case?

[pfflier]

Yes civilly and maybe criminally wrong. A mea culpa now is a CYA move for damage control in future litigation.

[the_individual2014]

This is why I do not believe in Trial by media, and believe in the concept of innocent until proven guilty, we need to go back to that.

[saintgermaine]

Far-left pundit admits she was ‘wrong’

Wrong as usual!

[SkyDancer]

Her typical wrong reporting, as the MSM usually does, could have cause someone to get revenge killing him.

[Gay State Conservative]

A blind squirrel...

[Blood of Tyrants]

“Grosskreutz also testified he put his hands in the air after Rittenhouse shot Huber and then saw Rittenhouse “re-rack” his rifle, the paper said, after which he figured Rittenhouse wouldn’t “accept [his] surrender” and then moved toward Rittenhouse. “

KR lowered the muzzle of his rifle when GG raised his hands and backed off. GG then saw his opportunity to attempt to kill KR, but KR was faster and shot GG instead.

[Drew68]

Good on her. I am surprised but I'll appreciate anyone owning up to being wrong, even if they're wrong on everything else.

It's becoming quite clear to many on the left that Rittenhouse was prosecuted not because there was a case to be made against him but only because social media demanded it.

I can only imagine what would've been if Twitter was around during the Duke Lacrosse case.

[Blueflag]

She makes a key statement at the end that demonstrates how CLUELESS she is about our legal system.

“because if you’re gonna make an argument that you acted in self-defense, there needs to be some proof that there was an imminent threat.”

No, sweetie, the State has to prove you acted absent the need for deadly force.

You simply do not have to prove your innocence in a real US court room.

[Getready]

Get that idiot off of tv. After all the videos out at the time ya think she would at least thought there was more to the story. She is a rank amateur and her apology means nothing. She needs a new career.

[TexasGurl24]

What’s sad is that, at least on this issue, this far left kook has more integrity than the AssPress, CNN, Washington Compost and the New York Slimes.

[BenLurkin]

How could anyone have come to the conclusion that the victim was chasing Rosenbaum?

[outofsalt]

"She interrupted her commentary with the video report breaking down the timeline that night, first showing a very angry Rosenbaum hollering "Shoot me!""

Misquoting there; it was "Shoot me, Nigga" Shoot me, Nigga!"

[Chode]

kinda hard to deny the video, isn’t it... ya miserable frunt you

[Retrofitted]

Too late. She needs to be sued into oblivion, as does the show she works, for until everyone she was near who ran this lie is asking folks if they want that sandwich in a large combo. It’s the ONLY thing these scum understand.

[\/\/ayne]

I thought the problem began when Kyle Rittenhouse was putting out a fire that the rioters had started. The rioters got upset and decided to kill him.

[IllumiNaughtyByNature]

Trying to get the defense position for when the defamation lawsuits start hitting. I GUARANTEE that is why she was told by her lawyers is doing this.