"In this case, Rittenhouse can argue that even if he provoked others to attack him by openly carrying his semi-automatic rifle at a mob scene"
Provoking? What crap, seeing a weapon should deescalate things unless you are too stupid to realize you can be shot.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: where's_the_Outrage?
If someone seeing you carrying a weapon provokes that person to attack you, that BOLSTERS your justification for shooting them in any rational person’s minds.
2 posted on
11/12/2021 3:21:33 PM PST by
fwdude
To: where's_the_Outrage?
“she was raped because she was wearing that short skirt”
same wrong argument.
3 posted on
11/12/2021 3:22:12 PM PST by
cableguymn
(We need a redneck in the white house.... But the fact checkers said theintjey did story was false!)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
if bad judgment was criminal the prisons would be full of LEFTIEs
4 posted on
11/12/2021 3:22:32 PM PST by
joshua c
(Dump the LEFT. Cable tv, Big tech, national name brands)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
How about the “outrageously poor judgment” of the “protesters’ who “took to the streets” and burned down a town to protest a plainly-justified police shooting.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Saw it was MSNBC and quit reading…
6 posted on
11/12/2021 3:23:03 PM PST by
daler
To: where's_the_Outrage?
MSNBC knows quite a lot about stories that don’t quite add up.
7 posted on
11/12/2021 3:23:10 PM PST by
Steely Tom
([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
To: where's_the_Outrage?
YEA YEA WE GET IT. WHITE CONSERVATIVES ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DEFEND THEMSELVES AGAINST THE PEDOS AND THUGS AND JUNKIES SOROS PAID TO TEAR UP CITIES AND BURN DOWN BUSINESSES.
ONLY COMMIES AND THEIR THUGS ARE ALLOWED TO INTENTIONALLY MURDER COPS AND INNOCENT PEOPLE.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Didn’t Crookshank the medic, or whatever his name was, bring a gun too? Hmmm…..
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Anyone who attacks an armed individual simply because they are armed deserves the consequences.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Barbara McQuade and MSNBC NEVER add up. Why post their total B.S.?
11 posted on
11/12/2021 3:24:44 PM PST by
Jim W N
(MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
his outrageously poor judgment in bringing a semi-automatic rifle to a protest.
If he hadn't bought the rifle to the protest, he'd have been seriously hurt or killed by three violent slimeballs. As it is, he successfully defended himself against the attacks of three violent slimeballs. His judgment seems sound to anyone who isn't a crazed leftist.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
quote “his outrageously poor judgment in bringing a semi-automatic rifle to a protest”
um.. you mean is very prudent judgement to exercise his constitutional right to bear arms during a riot which most likely saved his life!
To: where's_the_Outrage?
his outrageously poor judgment in bringing a semi-automatic rifle to a protest.The bad guys bring their guns.
16 posted on
11/12/2021 3:26:32 PM PST by
pfflier
To: where's_the_Outrage?
We would NOT be having this trial or discussion had the Kenosha Police Department not been told to Stand Down and allow the Soros/DNC inspired Communists of BLM and ANTIFA to RIOT, LOOT, BURN and wreak havoc in Kenosha to begin with.
The Mayor, Police Chief, City Council and DA of that community are fully responsible in their DERELICTION OF DUTY and deserve to be held to full account for creating the situation where ordinary citizens were put into the position of having to protect their community.
17 posted on
11/12/2021 3:26:40 PM PST by
Howie66
(Let's Go Brandon!!)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
That Rosenbaum guy was very threatening and racist to people on that day.
The media is protecting a pedophile, racist,and typical SJW warrior.
18 posted on
11/12/2021 3:26:42 PM PST by
DallasBiff
(Lautenberg The Forefather of "The Nanny State!")
To: where's_the_Outrage?
story doesn't quite ADD up Math is not your strong point.
19 posted on
11/12/2021 3:27:42 PM PST by
Mark
(Celebrities... is there anything they do not know? Homer Simpson)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
I notice one central assumption in this line of narrative that itself doesn’t “add up”, and that is that somehow Kyle didn’t have the right to be there but that the rioters did; that Kyle didn’t have the right to have a firearm with him but that the rioters did; that Kyle didn’t have a right to look threatening but that the rioters did to assault him. If your entire political stance is that one side has rights the other doesn’t, you lose.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
It provides that a “person who engages in unlawful conduct of a type likely to provoke others to attack, and who does provoke an attack, is not allowed to use or threaten force in self-defense against that attack.” That prohibition would seem to apply to Rittenhouse, whose alleged illegal possession of a semi-automatic rifle provoked others to attack him.And how exactly did his attackers know this was as an "illegal possession of a semi-automatic rifle"? "progessives" can be so downright ridiculous when seeking to crucify someone.
22 posted on
11/12/2021 3:28:55 PM PST by
Robwin
( )
To: where's_the_Outrage?
A MSNBC "analysis" carries with it the intellectual power of a Dorkbama statement on climate anything.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
MSNBC doesn’t add up to a lick of sense but it may not matter because their audience is made up of libtards 🤪
24 posted on
11/12/2021 3:29:45 PM PST by
NWFree
(Somebody has to say it)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson