Posted on 01/26/2022 9:39:12 AM PST by UMCRevMom@aol.com
The British Medical Journal (BMJ) is demanding pharmaceutical companies release raw COVID-19 vaccine data. BMJ Editors Peter Doshi, Fiona Godlee, and Kamran Abbasi published an editorial stating that “data should be fully and immediately available for public scrutiny” adding that much of the data from major vaccine manufacturers cannot be accessed because the vaccinations are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
The FDA is only producing data for Pfizer’s vaccine as both Moderna and Johnson & Johnson’s vaccines are not approved by the FDA, despite the popular misconception that they are. Rather, the latter pair have “Emergency Authorization Use,” status, rather than FDA approval.
Initially, the FDA said it was willing to release 500 pages of data per month. A judge in Texas rejected this offer, ordering the entity release 55,000 pages of the data the FDA used to license Pfizer’s vaccine.
At present, Pfizer “has indicated that it will not begin entertaining requests for trail data until May 2025,” some two years after the primary study completion. Moderna may release data at some point this year, but not before trials are complete. The estimated completion data for Moderna’s study trial review and completion is October 27 2022.
The BMJ called the refusal to release data an “unacceptable delay” and “morally indefensible.” The editorial continues, “We are left with publications but no access to the underlying data on reasonable request. This is worrying for trial participants, researchers, clinicians, journal editors, policy makers, and the public.”
“…Big Pharma is the least trusted industry. At least three of the many companies making COVID-19 vaccines have past criminal and civil settlements costing them billions of dollars. One pleaded guilty to fraud… now, the COVID pandemic has minted many new pharma billionaires.”
The BMJ editorial leans heavily into how these actions have led to a lack of public, academic, and scientific trust in both Big Pharma and the COVID-19 vaccines. “We need complete data transparency for all studies, we need it in the public interest, and we need it now.”
The editorial compares the current lack of access to data with the Tamiflu drug stockpiling a decade ago. The authors describe how during the last influenza outbreak, Tamiflu had not been shown to reduce the risk of complications, hospital admissions, and death from the virus, similarly to preliminary studies of the COVID-19 vaccination.
Trials for the efficacy of Tamiflu were sponsored by the manufacturer, and went unpublished. Those papers that were released were done so without author access to raw data. Academics demanding access were denied. The same thing is happening with the clinical trial and raw data held by Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson of their COVID-19 vaccines and clinical trials.
Despite the lack of access to data, the Biden regime continues to urge workers to get vaccinated with the experimental drug. The partisan divide on the legality of mandating experimental drugs on the American population has led nearly 50 percent of Democrat voters to support putting the unvaccinated in “camps.”
Covid-19 vaccines and treatments: we must have raw data, now
BMJ 2022; 376 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o102
The partisan divide on the legality of mandating experimental drugs on the American population has led nearly 50 percent of Democrat voters to support putting the unvaccinated in “camps.”
* Pfizer will BEGIN begin “entertaining” requests for trial data May 2025,TWO YEARS after the primary study completion.What if these trials should actually reveal the problems we all know about? What happens then? The FDA and CDC will say “Whoops, we are sorry you took those jabs”?* Moderna will not release data until trials are complete in October 2022.
Why is Moderna so far ahead of Pfizer in releasing its data? Do they need less time to “massage” it?
....as Big Pharma laughs its arses off all the way to the bank as they continue to make billions off COVID and their alleged vaccines and boosters..........
To be honest, the BMJ seems to be the only medical journal willing to speak any truth right now.
The rest are all compromised shills for Big Pharma
>>>The rest are all compromised shills for Big Pharma
Like all the so called fact checkers such as FB, Twitter, YT & even government entities etc?
To the best of my knowledge, only Pfizer's covid drug, "COMIRNATY", has been approved by the FDA.
All other "*vaccines*" are authorized under "emergency use conditions" and indemnify the manufacturer from civil lawsuit from personal damages.
According to the manufacturer, it will be available in the U.S. sometime in 2023, and is THE ONLY FDA APPROVED "*vaccine*".
COMIRNATY
I’ve seen this movie a 1000 times on the scifi channel. Wonder how this one ends?
Gore Vidal once denied being a conspiracy theorist saying, “no, I’m a conspiracy ANALYST.”
Where in the world is the COMIRNATY vaccine even available??
Was the COMIRNATY a trick play by the Covidian Cultists to spread the word that the vaccines are "FDA Approved" now?
TO the best of my knowledge, " COMIRNATY " is not yet available in the US, as specified by the manufacturer.
A few posted comments by Covidian cultist have stated, perhaps erroneously, that " COMIRNATY " is available in Europe.
I personally believe that " COMIRNATY " is a legalistic tactic by the manufacturer to confuse the population into thinking the conventional vaccine is now approved by the FDA;
it is NOT !!
Only " COMIRNATY " has any possible damages assessed to the manufacturer; despite both having identical ingredients.
This act alone should give you concern about the legal relationship between the FDA/NIH/CDC and the Big Pharma manufacturers (!).
Think of it as being similar to the automotive salesman involved in "Bait and Switch" on the car lot; same effect !
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.