To: SeekAndFind
I wasn’t in favor of this...
...until Megan Harkle.
2 posted on
02/05/2022 4:38:27 PM PST by
sauropod
(Whom the gods would destroy they first make mad. Life is risk, your highness.)
To: sauropod
I’ve come around on Camilla, Charles should have been with her from the beginning.
5 posted on
02/05/2022 4:40:44 PM PST by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: sauropod
6 posted on
02/05/2022 4:41:26 PM PST by
rlmorel
(Nothing can foster principles of freedom more effectively than the imposition of tyranny.)
To: sauropod
RE: I wasn’t in favor of this...
...until Megan Harkle.
Prince Harry isn’t even in the running. You’ll have to wish for the untimely death of William and his children first ( God forbid ).
To: sauropod
The crockery is flying in Montecito.
To: sauropod
Maybe Megan can be the lesbian consort to the royal consort. How progressive would that be to not be one of the other 52 genders!
28 posted on
02/05/2022 5:15:27 PM PST by
MtnClimber
(For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
To: sauropod
Exactly! Camilla is quite likable now that we have Meghan Markle in the picture!
43 posted on
02/05/2022 5:42:56 PM PST by
Joann37
To: sauropod
59 posted on
02/05/2022 6:05:57 PM PST by
higgmeister
( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
To: sauropod
Yep..... I think a Queen Consort is technically a queen but has no official power in that she could not become the monarch should the king die.
120 posted on
02/06/2022 1:13:05 AM PST by
Gaffer
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson