[where's_the_Outrage?]

I'm not a lawyer, but how can limiting the prosecution to present legally obtained evidence be correct?

Amazing.

[DoughtyOne]

This judge should be removed from the case.

You can’t try a person for something a judge has refused the
prosecution to present evidence for, to buttress its claims.

This is like trying a guy for murder, but you are refused to
present evidence there was one, and that the defendant was
in any way related to the murder.

[Oystir]

Because it is irrelevant to whether or not he lied about not having clients.

[Cboldt]

-- ... how can limiting the prosecution to present legally obtained evidence be correct? --

Those facts aren't material to proving the alleged crime was committed.

[Paladin2]

The ‘Rat persecution now is always allowed to disallow any and all defense evidence as “misinformation”.

[DAC21]

So over the weekend all the articles indicating that no way the Clintons cabal / Lawyers would be able to suppress the evidence is now moot. BLOW IT ALL UP.

[kiryandil]

Obama stooge.

Always have a stooge in the Left place at the Left time.

[Robert DeLong]

Durham had said if Sussmann “were to concede or decline to dispute the fact that no secret channel of communications actually existed” between the Trump Organization email server and Alfa-Bank, then prosecutors “would not seek to offer proof concerning the ultimate accuracy and reliability of the relevant data.”

I think that is the key to your question.

[Eagles6]

Not talking about this ruling, but it seems that Durham is trying to limit the FBI, DOJ & CIA culpability in the coup.

They knew that the whole Russia, Russia, Russia thing was 🦬💩 and who was behind it and were thrilled to play along.

[ptsal]

The fix is going in.

[swingdoc]

“...unless Sussmann first tried to argue the collusion claims were true.”

Ok, talk away Sussmann, anything you say in court will further be held against you. Maybe he’d be smarter to just play Mueller’s case summary instead.

Still, what a terrible court decision.

[LS]

Shocked! Shocked, I tell ya.

[jmacusa]

Some one made an interesting observation here recently noting that there doesn’t appear to be any actual video of Durham giving a press conference or on tv. Just a couple of still photos of him.

Maybe it doesn’t matter in the grand scheme of things but it is something to consider.

[Gay State Conservative]

Osama Obama appointee.

[taxcontrol]

One side states a fact. If the fact is disputed, then both sides trot out their arguments and evidence. If the fact is accepted as a fact, there is no dispute thus no evidence need be presented.

Think of it like this. One side says water is wet. The other says no it is only damp ... now argue it out. -or- One side says water is wet. The other side says ... yep. No need to prove that water is wet as it is now an accepted fact by both sides.

[euram]

Another of 0bama’s Affirmative Action judges.