Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JUST IN - U.S. Supreme Court has voted to strike down Roe vs. Wade, an initial draft majority opinion by Justice Alito shows.
VANITY ^

Posted on 05/02/2022 5:59:54 PM PDT by TigerClaws

JUST IN - U.S. Supreme Court has voted to strike down Roe vs. Wade, an initial draft majority opinion by Justice Alito shows.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: abbyphillip; abortion; alito; amitjain; babieswin; casey; cnn; draft; elizabethwarren; fauxahontas; federalism; feminazisinafrenzy; hillarysfault; joyreid; lieawatha; life; massachusetts; obamacare; plannedparenthood; pocahontas; politico; pollutico; prolife; prolifevictory; righttolife; roe; roevwade; samalito; scotus; scotusleak; sotomayor; statesrights; thanktrump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 421-429 next last
To: Captainpaintball

“You morons do not realize that abortion helped stave off the destruction of the US. YES, it is disgusting. YES it is evil. YES the women who do it are stupid in the best case to evil in the worst case. YES the abortion industry is satanic. BUT...

Let them do it. Let GOD take care of them. Let US live our lives with some sort of semblance of quality before we turn into Planet of the Apes. “

Your rant is sickening and disgusting.
Abortion is murder.
There is no issue with clearer moral clarity.
Your post is supportive of eugenics which was a top priority of Hitler.
Wake up and see clearly so your soul may be saved.


161 posted on 05/02/2022 6:40:10 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (Have you seen Joe Biden's picture on a milk carton?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: vivenne

See what Robert’s does to address it.

- - - - - - -

Let’s say a judge leaks opinions. Is there anything John Roberts can do to stop him?


162 posted on 05/02/2022 6:40:18 PM PDT by TTFX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

Well goodbye midterms, we are gonna have a blue wave this November, this would have been better written up AFTER that


163 posted on 05/02/2022 6:40:22 PM PDT by captain_jonas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

I think the likelihood that this is fake is at least 50%. It smells too much like the “leak” of Trump’s phone call with Zelensky, where the content was distorted under the assumption that the source wouldn’t release documentation proving the reports false. Here, it’s unlikely that any justice will affirm or deny the document. The reporting will be used to gin up outrage extending to pro-abortion moderates who might otherwise be inclined to kick out the Democrats in the mid-terms and lessening the party’s dependence on fraud tactics.


164 posted on 05/02/2022 6:40:34 PM PDT by william clark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newnhdad

That and it likely wouldn’t make it through Congress and they knew it.


165 posted on 05/02/2022 6:40:49 PM PDT by vivenne (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: I-ambush

“If true I think this indicates Roberts voted with the minority, or else he would have assigned himself the opinion.”

He may have, or he may have delegated the “hot potato” to another justice. Or he may have a concurring opinion but not completely agree with the majority (less likely before the draft has actually circulated). We won’t know until the opinion is posted.


166 posted on 05/02/2022 6:40:59 PM PDT by calenel (Undo the Coup)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Eh, need independent confirmation..


167 posted on 05/02/2022 6:41:14 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

It is on Hannity right now!


168 posted on 05/02/2022 6:41:15 PM PDT by carcraft (Pray for our Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: absalom01

Wow, that didn’t take long.


169 posted on 05/02/2022 6:41:32 PM PDT by GnuThere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Trying to change the outcome before it is official. The Left never plays by the rules.


170 posted on 05/02/2022 6:41:45 PM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (I went to bed on November 3rd 2020 and woke up in 1984.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

two bits says it is the lefty gal on the court.


171 posted on 05/02/2022 6:41:51 PM PDT by elpadre (W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

I am very suspicious about this. I suggest everyone calm down until the actual release is made. This might turn out to be a total fabrication.


172 posted on 05/02/2022 6:41:59 PM PDT by Ronin (White privilege is not having to fake your own hate crimes. (HT: CrappieLuck))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaden

If this comes to pass then the divide between sheep and goat states is really going to widen.


173 posted on 05/02/2022 6:42:18 PM PDT by BiglyCommentary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Pollard

Eh, need that independent confirmation.


174 posted on 05/02/2022 6:43:00 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

Mitch McConnell has no agenda for the Election, so I could see the Democrats coming from behind and not having as much of a blowout.


175 posted on 05/02/2022 6:43:04 PM PDT by TakebackGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

If it was a leak of a real decision, it’s meant to scare people. It it’s a ‘leak’ or a made-up decision, then, it was still meant to scare people.

Why? Why scare people?

Well, it’s about democrats running very scared, and they want to scare people about what could happen if republicans end up with the house and the senate. It’s meant to scare people into voting for democrats this coming November, else, Roe v Wade could be overturned, unless democrats remain in control in Washington. Democrats would be emboldened if the people return them to Washington with full control of the government, and emboldened democrats would then use that power to claim that the people want them to control SCOTUS and the only way that democrats could gain control of the SCOTUS would be by packing the court with democrats, enough progressives to rule over major decisions for decades.

Democrats will not lose, and the ‘leak’ from the SCOTUS is their way of trying to retain power,and to gain even more power.


176 posted on 05/02/2022 6:43:38 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TTFX

Yes. Removal and disbarrment.


177 posted on 05/02/2022 6:43:48 PM PDT by vivenne (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude

How exactly does this leak influence the Supremes? I get the idea of riling up the base, but changing the opinion is unlikely. The five Justices named here I very much doubt will change their minds. This has been in place since 1973. Opinions have been formed on this for decades. And it’s a no change, change. States can still allow the procedure, and states can ban it. If Texas bans it, and someone wants one, they drive to New Mexico and get one. Or fly to CA and get one.


178 posted on 05/02/2022 6:44:28 PM PDT by Tuxedo (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: adorno

To light a fire under their voters to get them to come out and vote.


179 posted on 05/02/2022 6:45:06 PM PDT by vivenne (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

Yes , a fabrication to incite violence and intimidation against conservative judges .


180 posted on 05/02/2022 6:46:04 PM PDT by katykelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 421-429 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson