Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cotton: U.S. Army’s Affirmative Action For Women ‘Is Going To Get People Killed’
https://thefederalist.com/2022/05/13/cotton-u-s-armys-affirmative-action-for-women-is-going-to-get-p ^ | May 13, 2022 | Elaine Donelly

Posted on 05/13/2022 12:21:23 PM PDT by Kaslin

Only 52 percent of active-duty enlisted women, compared to 92 percent of the men, were able to pass the Army Combat Fitness Test.

It was gratifying to watch Arkansas Republican Sen. Tom Cotton questioning Christine Wormuth, the first female Secretary of the Army, at a recent Senate Armed Services Committee hearing.

Sen. Cotton, a Ranger-qualified infantry veteran, respectfully chastised Wormuth for the “fiasco” that the new Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) has become. For the past three years, the Army has tried but failed to implement “gender-neutral” standards in the new Combat Fitness Test — mainly because of high failure rates among female trainees.

After women in combat rules changed in 2015, the Army designed the ACFT to be sex-neutral, with identical requirements and scoring tables for men and women. The new ACFT would replace the long-standing Army Physical Fitness Test, which was sex-normed with different requirements and scores to allow for male/female physical differences. 

At that time, women were not eligible for direct ground combat (infantry) assignments. Now that they are, sex-normed training standards are untenable. There is no sex-norming on the battlefield.

Cotton read back to Wormuth her own 2021 testimony promising that the new ACFT would have sex-neutral standards. When former Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter ordered all combat positions to be opened for women in 2015, he and the Army’s official Implementation Plan promised that concerns about combat effectiveness would be addressed by “effective leadership” and “gender-neutral standards.”

Dangerous Lowered Standards

Nevertheless, after several versions of the ACFT failed, this year the Army dropped sex neutrality and reinstated sex-norming. Secretary Wormuth acknowledged the Army’s stunning reversal, suggesting that the new ACFT was “more challenging.” Cotton responded bluntly: “The new standards are pathetic — They are absolutely pathetic.”

Cotton noted that soldiers qualifying for the infantry will have to do only 10 push-ups instead of 35. He also quoted the Army’s Frequently Asked Questions webpage stating that commanders may not set higher standards for acceptance or retention in a combat unit. “This,” said Cotton, “is going to get people killed.”  

The ACFT project, initiated by then-Army Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley and Defense Secretary Mark Esper, always was controversial. The previous physical fitness test involved sex-normed sit-ups, push-ups, and a two-mile run that could be done anywhere. The new six-event Combat Fitness Test required expensive equipment, sex- and age-neutral standards, and considerable time to prepare for and administer the test.

Requirements included the leg tuck (pulling the knees up while suspended on a high bar); a 25-meter sprint, drag, and carry of a 90 lb. sled and two 40 lb. kettlebells; throwing a 10-lb. medicine ball backward over the head; hand-release push-ups (lifting hands and arms at the bottom of the push-up); and a two-mile run.

Women struggled with the leg-tuck exercise, and the “age-neutral” standards raised questions. Why should an infantry team leader, a Pentagon-based three-star, and a 125 lb. X-ray technician have to meet identical physical fitness standards?

The original ACFT also tried to match individuals to various occupations with different requirements for heavy, significant, or moderate physical demands. An infantry-bound soldier, for example, had to perform 30 hand-release push-ups to earn a minimum score on that event, compared to 10 push-ups for others headed for less strenuous occupations.

Second and Third Attempts at Revised Test

The experiment started to fall apart in 2019, when 85 percent of female soldiers failed to pass. In response to congressional pressure, ACFT 2.0 allowed the choice of a two-minute plank exercise instead of the leg-tuck, and an optional 2.5 mile walk instead of the 2-mile run.

Version 3.0 of the ACFT contrived a system to evaluate women’s scores in “performance bands” or “tiers” comparing women’s performance to men’s. The top 1 percent of both men and women, for example, would be rated in the Platinum group, even though their performance levels were dramatically different.

Congressionally Ordered Study Reveals Dismal Results

This color-coded “gender-neutral” tiered illusion fooled no one, and failure rates for female and older soldiers remained high. In 2021, a congressionally ordered study of the ACFT was done by RAND, a Defense Department contractor that has long supported leftist policies. RAND gathered data from 630,000 tests, and the results were dismal.

Only 52 percent of active-duty enlisted women, compared to 92 percent of the men, were able to pass the ACFT. Women’s pass rates were higher among officers — 72 percent compared to 96 percent of male officers — but pass rates were lower in the National Guard and Reserves.

RAND also reported that for Regular Army enlisted women, pass rates in the bottom ten military occupational specialties (MOSs), ranged from 31 to 44 percent, and in the top ten, from 65 to 89 percent. In comparison, success rates for enlisted men in the bottom ten MOSs ranged from 83 to 86 percent, and they scored 98 to 100 percent in the top ten MOSs.

Even with several caveats, the empirical data clearly showed that theories about physical gender equality in military combat training were inconsistent with physical realities. RAND cautioned that gender-norming the ACFT would “ensure parity in pass rates between groups, but it would also require the Army to accept differences in potential combat readiness among soldiers who are held to different testing standards.”

Fourth Try at Test

Cotton faults Army officials for accepting that tradeoff. Shortly after release of the RAND report in March, the Army announced ACFT 4.0, which reneged on previous promises to implement sex-neutral standards.

The new sex-normed test adjusted requirements and scoring tables, dropped the leg-tuck event, and abandoned attempts to match individuals to heavier jobs with tougher requirements. Like the old Army test, ACFT 4.0 measures basic physical fitness, not readiness for advanced combat training.

Gender-neutral standards did not work in the ACFT, and as we have already seen in the Special Operations Forces Command, “diversity and inclusion” mandates encourage minimal standards, not meritocratic excellence.

A recent Rasmussen poll found that 59 percent of respondents favored women in combat, but even more, 66 percent, said that women should pass the same physical fitness requirements as male soldiers. What if women don’t meet equal standards?

Cotton said he was “disappointed and borderline appalled” by the situation, and he would not allow it to stand. He and Secretary Wormuth were talking about two different things — combat effectiveness on his side and “fairness” to certain “subgroups” on hers. Congress should re-evaluate female combat assignment policies, putting meritocracy and military readiness first.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: ashtoncarter; bloggers; christinewormuth; combatreadiness; combattroops; markmilley; military; militaryreadiness; tomcotton; womenincombat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Kaslin

action for women and men who want to be women and women who want to be men and-and-and-— It is all part of a project to destroy the morale of the troops.


41 posted on 05/13/2022 5:38:51 PM PDT by arthurus (covfefe fod)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Catholic and Conservative

You have to do 30 right out of the gate.

This is a volunteer service.

Get in shape long before they slice your hair off.


42 posted on 05/13/2022 5:46:37 PM PDT by eyedigress (Trump is my President! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MercyFlush

Why did the AF have to lift heavier weight than Navy or Army at MEPS?


43 posted on 05/13/2022 5:49:25 PM PDT by eyedigress (Trump is my President! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
This is one more example in the list of WOKE capabilities boasted by the new liberalnation army, from allowing transgenders to serve in the military,

and ensuring free gender reassignment surgery for active military personnel,

and with the The Pentagon Forming a Diversity and Inclusion Office,

and the Air Force creating 'LGBTQ' and 'Indigenous Nations Equality' Focus Groups,

as well as the Army's woke recruitment ad featuring lesbians at a gay wedding and an LGBTQ pride march, along with the CIA's 'cisgender millennial with anxiety disorder' campaign, and the

Marines and Navy as well as the Air Force and Army posting messages on social media supporting gay pride and Pride Month,

to the Navy's first all gay U.S. Navy helicopter crew

to lower fitness standards for women

while nearly half of female soldiers are still failing the new Army Fitness Test,

yet calling for Increased Diversity and More Women in Combat,

and changing its song to be gender-neutral,

and also Forcing Marines to Make Boot Camp Coed,

and feeding cadets cultural Marxist propaganda about gender and masculinity therein,

to its new diversity and inclusion operation from West Point

and for its Special Operations Command ,

while showing a rapid response readiness to engage in online combat with the likes of Tucker Carson and other such enemies

while nuking Jesus-themed candies on an Air Force bases -

not just Pepe the Frog -

while allowing turbans and hijabs in the Air Force,

while working to rid the military of “extremism

such as the head of the US Space Force unit being fired and put under investigation for criticizing Critical Race Theory

And said, O my God, I am ashamed and blush to lift up my face to thee, my God: for our iniquities are increased over our head, and our trespass is grown up unto the heavens. (Ezra 9:6)


44 posted on 05/13/2022 5:52:28 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save U + be baptized + follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TwelveOfTwenty

Why introduce the romantic element onto the combat team? That helps how?


45 posted on 05/13/2022 6:16:54 PM PDT by MSF BU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: KittyKares

...imagine trying to fight those guys and living to tell the tale.
_________________________

My husband laughs til he cries at those scenes. Especially when the female protagonist is wearing heels.

I can’t imagine it, either.


46 posted on 05/13/2022 8:26:02 PM PDT by reformedliberal (Make yourself less available.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Renkluaf
Of course, it will get people killed. And that will be swept under the rug and denied all day long.

I think Sen. Cotton knows this, but about half the members of Congress would rather have the dead bodies than be forced to acknowledge physical differences between men and women.

47 posted on 05/13/2022 10:51:11 PM PDT by Right_Wing_Madman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bump for in the morning.


48 posted on 05/13/2022 11:09:58 PM PDT by PLMerite ("They say that we were Cold Warriors. Yes, and a bloody good show, too." - Robert Conquest )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
Ah, men, thr fairer sex.

 

 

now

49 posted on 05/14/2022 4:14:41 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU
Why introduce the romantic element onto the combat team? That helps how?

It doesn't, but if we're going to fund the leftist media that's pushing this with our TV subscriptions and fund the communists who have everything to gain by our weakness with our consumer dollars so we can get cheaper goods, then we're helping to cause it regardless of what we post.

50 posted on 05/14/2022 6:51:43 AM PDT by TwelveOfTwenty (Will whoever keeps asking if this country can get any more insane please stop?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: whitney69
...It isn’t the military that determines the training requirements or the actual operations of who, what, and most important, where we are to do the first two.

The egomaniac attitude of politicians and their elevated swaggering tough guy/gal attitude about the US military capacity without their logical reasoning of the entire picture, or not caring, of the consequences of their judgement in a game they aren’t playing, is sadly short sighted.

Wait until it gets cold and our citizens can’t warm their house, or put gas into the car to go by food, or lose their property because they can’t get parts to repair it and still get whatever medicine they can afford. And all the while they are subsidizing the voting booths with people they are literally taking life support away from the US citizens and creating space for them with jobs, food, medical, and funds.

Excellent points all through your insightful reply.

51 posted on 05/14/2022 11:20:57 AM PDT by GOPJ (King Biden of MAAH (Make America A Hellhole) ||| Pray for the MAGA King's Return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MercyFlush
Well, the only way this woke nonsense gets stopped is with the blood of a lot of women.

That will also mean the blood of a lot of men, too - and possible defeat on the battlefield. Is that worth it?

52 posted on 05/14/2022 1:03:24 PM PDT by Gritty (Follow the money in politics, you find the criminals. Is it now true in the medical profession?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Gritty

“That will also mean the blood of a lot of men, too - and possible defeat on the battlefield. Is that worth it?”

Of course not, but this is where the leftists are taking us.


53 posted on 05/14/2022 4:31:12 PM PDT by MercyFlush (The Soviet Empire is right now doing a dead cat bounce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson