[conservative98]

1. Wrong, National Review! This is not a federal civil rights issue.— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) May 25, 2022

2. This is a lawsuit intended to change existing campaign law in Pennsylvania, in violation of Article II AND the state's constitution (where change in election laws require input by the citizens and other significant hurdles). Do NOT count the defective absentee ballots.— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) May 25, 2022

3. That's what the leftwing Democrats want and do. And this is why the RNC and PA state GOP are OPPOSED to this desperate lawsuit. https://t.co/lN9DEYn0WF— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) May 25, 2022

[Chad C. Mulligan]

If you’re too stupid to follow simple written instructions, you shouldn’t be voting. Period. End of story.

[Parley Baer]

Sorry, but I do not like changing the rules in the middle of the game.

[HandBasketHell]

This should NOT be happening.

If McCormick wins the lawsuit then Democrats will flood the MidTerms with undated mail-in ballots and they will rightly be able to say that the matter was decided in the republican primaries.

[FLT-bird]

National Review is the voice of the RINO Establishment.

[zeestephen]

Andrew McCarthy used to be the only person I read and respected at National Review.

In 2020, he attacked Trump and Republicans for the January 6th Voter Fraud speech and demonstration.

Now this.

Bye, Andrew.

Bye, National Review.

[Vermont Lt]

Just follow the damned rules.

Now the GOP is acting like Democrats.

[Robert DeLong]

A court decision by the Commonwealth’s highest court holds that mail-in voters must comply with technical requirements, including the dating requirement, in order for their votes to count.

End of discussion.

[DMD13]

Only count legal votes, sorry National Cuck (Review).

[ballplayer]

So they dumped a bunch of illegal ballots on time,They had no dates written on them as required! Throw them put

[Captain Jack Aubrey]

Can we all agree that Andrew McCarthy is a horses ass like he said Peter Navarro is?