Posted on 05/28/2022 2:40:24 PM PDT by Vlad0
The war in Ukraine is a trompe l’oeil. Behind the appearances of the unity of NATO and its consolidation by new members, several big players run with the hare and hunt with the hounds. In reality, all those who are not blinded by their own propaganda know that their side is going to lose and is already planning other enemies on other battlefields. Washington is making the best of a bad situation and using Russian pressure to close ranks.
On the front of the stage, Nato assures that it has been strengthened by “Putin’s madness”. Ukraine, powerfully armed by the West, is leading a counter-offensive and pushing back the “invader”. At the international level, the sanctions are bearing fruit. Finland and Sweden, feeling threatened, decided to join the Atlantic Alliance. Soon the Russians will overthrow the “dictator” in the Kremlin.
This magnificent narrative is contradicted by the facts: only about a third of Western weapons reach the front. But the Ukrainian army is exhausted. Almost everywhere it is retreating and a few exploits do not change the overall picture. Two-thirds of Western weapons, especially the heaviest ones, are already available on the black market in the Balkans, particularly in Kosovo and Albania, which have become the main places for trafficking in this area. Western sanctions pose a risk of famine, not in Russia, but in the rest of the world and particularly in Africa. Turkey and Croatia are opposed to the accession of new members to NATO. It is possible to convince them, but at the price of radical political changes which the West has always opposed.
Even if Russia is wise enough to not celebrate its victory too loudly, as it did in Syria, it will be seen as the failure of the greatest military force in history, NATO. A victory without appeal, since the Atlantic Alliance was physically involved in the fight, while it stood around the battlefields in Syria. Many of Washington’s vassal states will try to break free. It is likely that their civilian leaders will remain mentally oriented toward the West, while their military leaders will turn more quickly toward Moscow and Beijing. In the years to come, the cards will be reshuffled. It will not be a matter of shifting from alignment with Washington to alignment with the new victors, but of creating a multipolar world where everyone is responsible for themselves. What is at stake is not a redefinition of zones of influence, but the end of the mentality establishing a hierarchy between peoples.
From this prospective point of view, it is fascinating to observe Western rhetoric. Many experts from the old world explain that Russia wants to rebuild its empire. They claim that it has already reconquered Ossetia and Crimea and is now attacking the Donbass. They reconstruct history with falsified quotes from President Putin. Anyone who studies contemporary Russia and checks the data knows that this is not true. The accession of Crimea to the Russian Federation and the future accession of Ossetia, Donbass and Transnistria have nothing to do with an empire, but with the reconstitution of the Russian nation, which was dismembered during the collapse of the Soviet Union.
In this context, a small part of the Western leadership is beginning to challenge the choices of their American overlord. The same phenomenon took place during the last trimester at the end of the mandate of French President Nicolas Sarkozy. The latter, seeing the human disaster he had contributed to provoke in Libya and his failure in Syria, agreed to negotiate a separate peace with Damascus. However, Washington, furious with his independence, organized his electoral defeat in favor of François Hollande. In the days following his accession to the Élysée Palace, the latter re-launched the Western war machine for a decade. It is precisely at this time that Russia committed itself to intervene in Syria. For two years it finished developing new weapons, then came to fight the jihadists armed by the West and directed by NATO from its Allied Land Command in Turkey.
-- read the rest at the link --
.
Long pile of pure bs.
Kidsinger , Putin , CFR and Xi
After making it appear that Russian tanks rolled into Ukraine, the CIA will make it appear that Chinese warship land on Taiwan.
Kissinger , Putin , CFR and Xi
So, effectively, everything Bush, Obama and now Biden have done has damaged the US’ reputation and now irrevocably.
If the neocon/globalists have their way, it will be endless military conflicts. You would think people would have wised up by now.
“Long pile of pure bs.”
Strangely constructed. Very verbose. I’m wondering if it was translated from another language.
Thanks, bkm for AM
More psyops from the Voltaire people. In their own words describing themselves “ We are not only journalists, but also and above all committed citizens who defend the United Nations Charter”. The same UN that wants to send their blue helmet rape teams into America to confiscate firearms ? Yep !
Never heard that before!
Nice! I like it.
“Long pile of pure bs.”
Strangely constructed. Very verbose. I’m wondering if it was translated from another language.
If i didn’t know the context I’d assume you were discussing a NY times article!
The only thing that matter,is Russians are still dying and their armor is being whittled down. Reported yesterday that T-62s are being sent into Ukraine due to heavy losses of T-72s and T-80s. The T-62 is slower, lighter, less armored, and no match against today’s technology. It has a crew of 4 vs 3.
Russia cannot replace their losses on the production line. It’s calling up 10,000 tanks, half which are operational and the other half used for parts, which are no longer produced.
Wishful thinking. And at this point it’s a best case scenario for Russia. But Russia already lost when they failed to take Kiev.
Now they are hoping to get a little something for all the Russian lives, money, and reputation they lost. Russia proved their army is garbage. And their Air Force even worse. And their missiles suck.
Looks to me like EVIL RUSSIA is WINNING!
The piece is a thoughtful analysis considering several different hypothesis, with historical context and an understanding of the global political landscape and all you can offer is your ignorance; why bother?
“Will be?”
Where have you been since 1939?
Before there were brief pauses in between, now it’s one right after another.
Could all be a feign. Why? Whose? Is the US the prize? Why not?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.