Since when do CIA directors have any credibility?
For tyrannies to become established an external enemy is necessary, even if you have to just make one up.
“Our best intelligent judgement”
I stopped there.
We seem to be getting conflicting “stories” on this matter. There’s this, then there is the constant “Iran is x weeks from nuking Israel” side of it. You’d like to believe that our -makers have the truth. I wonder.
Or, maybe he’s lying now
The author of this site is obviously Russian. And here is the important part - excerpted:
“..But in order for diplomacy to really advance and to materialize in agreements, it is not enough to admit that the nuclear weapons narrative is false, it is necessary that all sanctions be banned, and that Washington removes the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) from its list of terrorist organizations, in addition to establishing a truly neutral and impartial nuclear monitoring mechanism that does not act in an interventionist manner or violate Iranian sovereignty. Until this is achieved, there will be no concrete possibility of agreement...”
Iran is terrorist central and has been since the Revolution of 1979.
There seems to be a low-level war going on between Mossad and Iran, on Iranian soil. Trying to slow or stop a nuclear program that doesn’t exist?
I think it’s more likely this guy is lying.
Iran just bragged about the amount of enriched uranium they have. And about their ability to enrich it further very quickly.
How did they get this material and capability if they are not working towards a bomb.
And given their repeated, and continued statements that they intend to wipe out Israel. And given their support of terrorism. The benefit of the doubt should go against Iran.
Burns is bringing a huge charge! Shouldn’t the word “alleges” be used instead of “admits?” Previous portrayers certainly have rights.
So we should believe the CIA now? Sorry, not me. I think they lie when they choose and that may be with this statement. You really cannot trust them. Sad to say.
I assume that Burns will be in front of the Intel Committee tomorrow morning so he can explain this... Guessing not.
I guess I’ll read the final report by the light of the mushroom cloud.....
I’m so tired of being lied to by everyone in this “government”
There is no way refining the highly enriched uranium isn’t a dead giveaway that a nuclear program is underway....these statements are lies to enable the new policy of signing a new deal with Iran.
But in order for diplomacy to really advance and to materialize in agreements, it is not enough to admit that the nuclear weapons narrative is false, it is necessary that all sanctions be banned, and that Washington removes the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) from its list of terrorist organizations, in addition to establishing a truly neutral and impartial nuclear monitoring mechanism that does not act in an interventionist manner or violate Iranian sovereignty. Until this is achieved, there will be no concrete possibility of agreement.
I don’t believe this for a second. Iran wants nukes to destroy the little satan and the big satan. If they believed in truth, they would nuke themselves because allah, the great deceiver, is satan, the master of lies. Like the American left, everything they say is backwards. The “little satan and big satan” are the ones searching for Godly truth and they are the evil ones who fund terrorism and want to destroy the world.
“Since when do CIA directors have any credibility?”
Kind of hard to, when they keep changing stories.
In the case of Iran, I’ll trust Israel as their preference is to NOT start more wars around the world, unless they have choice in the matter.
He’s trying to make excuses for 0bama’s “nuclear deal” and billions in cash with Iran.
See, those nice Iranians weren’t a threat after all. Trust us ...
Yeah right sure thing. Next he’ll say Iran wants friendly relations with Israel
Yeah, well, I don’t believe this either. Lies add up. The US is no longer credible about anything.