Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REVEALED: Kanye West can't sell 'White Lives Matter' apparel because the trademark is owned by two black activists who want to prevent anyone from 'profiting off the pain' of phrase
Daily Mail ^ | November 2, 2022 | Keith Griffith

Posted on 11/02/2022 8:43:20 PM PDT by Angelino97

Two black radio hosts have revealed that they own the trademark to the phrase 'White Lives Matter,' preventing the artist formerly known as Kanye West or anyone else from profiting off the controversial phrase.

Ramses Ja and Quinton Ward, Phoenix-based activists and hosts of the nationally syndicated radio show Civic Cipher, revealed their trademark rights in a recent interview with radio station KRRL-FM.

'We are the holder of the federal trademark for White Lives Matter,' said Ja. 'If you want to sell that shirt, you have to come knock on my door, or you have to face Morris, my lawyer.'...

Ja and Ward explained that the trademark for 'White Lives Matter' was originally registered by one of their listeners, who transferred it to them in a process that was recently completed.

'This person who first procured it didn't really love owning it, because the purpose was not necessarily to get rich off of it; the purpose was to make sure that other people didn't get rich off of that pain,' Ja told the news site Capital B.

Ja and Ward say that they plan to enforce their trademark rights to ensure any use of the phrase ultimately goes to benefit black and brown communities.

'We know that phrases like 'White Lives Matter,' 'All Lives Matter,' and 'Blue Lives Matter' continue to cause harm and to dilute the narrative that was intended to be established by Black Lives Matter,' Ja told Capital B.

'Those phrases are piggybacking off of black people's creativity and efforts, so we're all for helping to use this as a measure to allow black people to retain a little bit of ownership,'

A review of federal records confirms that Civic Cipher LLC is the owner of the 'White Lives Matter' trademark, first registered on October 3.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: 1619project; 2022election; alllivesmatter; arizona; blackkk; blackliesmanors; blackliesmatter; blacklivesmatter; blm; bluelivesmatter; chat; civiccipher; criticalracetheory; crt; election2022; election2024; kanyewest; notnews; phoenix; quintonward; ramsesja; whitelivesmatter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: Brian Griffin
Melanin impaired lives matter!
41 posted on 11/03/2022 4:08:27 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (I Miss Jimmy Carter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Angelino97

Just go with White Life Matters... Simple enough...


42 posted on 11/03/2022 4:12:33 AM PDT by sit-rep ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

Of course they don’t. The left hates MLK’s emphasis on character. That’s why it’s the perfect message to torment them with. That and the fact that it’s true.


43 posted on 11/03/2022 7:57:13 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Hmm. Isn’t that “cybersquatting”, to a degree?

Yes, and you can't do it with trademarks. It's "use 'em or lose 'em."

44 posted on 11/03/2022 8:10:14 AM PDT by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
"NO LIVES MATTER™ LOL. Excellent Laz.
45 posted on 11/03/2022 8:12:18 AM PDT by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Angelino97

46 posted on 11/03/2022 8:14:37 AM PDT by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
Apparently there is trademark squatting, defined as registering a trademark without the intent to use it or prevent others from using it.
47 posted on 11/03/2022 10:12:35 AM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Angelino97

Simple language solution: White Lives Too matter, or White Lives Do Matter too


48 posted on 11/03/2022 10:16:29 AM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
You can't copyright a simple phrase or word. You can't copyright a short phrase or instruction that can't be expressed in other ways, thus prohibiting someone from expressing the same idea.

But you can trademark a phrase. Coca-Cola (I think it was them) trademarked "Ah-ha!" or something like it, because they used it on their bottles. It doesn't mean no one can say or write it. It only means no competing soft drink company can use it on their bottles.

Trademarking a political statement, or any statement, is harder to TM, because it runs afoul of the First Amendment. I don't think you can use copyright or trademark to hinder speech. Copyright has a Fair Use exception, and trademarks simply wouldn't be protected to hinder an expression.

49 posted on 11/03/2022 12:01:50 PM PDT by Angelino97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson