Russia Hoaxer Marc Elias Gloats: Republicans ‘Destroyed’ in Midterm Election Court Cases

Breitbart ^ | 11/07/2022 | Joel B Pollack

[ChicagoConservative27]

Marc Elias, the Democrat lawyer who played a key role in creating the “Russia collusion” hoax, and who pushed for vote-by-mail in the 2020 election, gloated Monday that Republicans were being “destroyed” in court cases over the 2022 midterm election process.

Elias is primarily known for challenging election results in close races so that Democrats win, even in cases where Republicans appear to win on Election Day. He pushed for vote-by-mail in 2020 and is active in several lawsuits to liberalize voting rules today.

[ChicagoConservative27]

This guy is a complete dumpster fire loser

[x]

Wasn’t Mark Elias behind all the voter fraud?

Or was that another DNC lawyer?

[vivenne]

It’s him.

[DarthVader]

That’s not what we are seeing in the court cases. He is on LSD.

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

I wonder why this is not used by Republican lawyers? https://newswithviews.com/federal-elections-end-at-midnight-on-election-day/ Foster v Love, 522 U.S. 67, 71-72 is a 9-0 decision back in 1997 by the U.S. Supreme Court. They agreed to take up the issue of federal statutes vs state’s regarding election for federal offices and state election dates. The case that started it: MURPHY J. FOSTER, Jr., GOVERNOR OF LOUISIANA, et al., PETITIONERS v. G. SCOTT LOVE, PAUL S. BERGERON, KATHLEEN B. BALHOFF, and BENNIE BAKER-BOURGEOIS. It’s rare SCOTUS has a 9-0 decision and this one surprised me considering the late Ruth Bader Ginsberg was on the bench back then. You can read the transcript of the oral arguments in Foster v Love here. Quoting Ginsberg: “It is an election, and it seems to me, being an election it conflicts with the Federal single Election Day.” It’s unfortunate this was not the key argument in Trump’s lawsuits although several of us tried to get him this information. Constitutional attorney, Ren Jander’s November 18, 2020 piece, Elections Undecided by Midnight are Void & Preempted by Federal Law – Foster v Love (1997; 9-0 Decision) is a thorough examination of that case and federal statutes. Jander wrote, “Federal Election Day statutes were designed to curtail fraud, and to infuse a prima facie sense of integrity in our electoral process. But these States – in failing to obey Congressional deadlines – have flagrantly attempted to preempt federal law. This is certainly prohibited, and this is why the late election results are void.” After a comprehensive analysis of the Constitution, federal and state statutes, Jander further writes: “Consider all of the above in light of the results of the 2020 presidential elections; in Pennsylvania today, two weeks after Election Day, 8000 votes suddenly appeared, and the initial count is still not complete; Arizona has tens of thousands of ballots left to count in the initial canvass; Georgia discovered over 2600 missing votes yesterday, and the entire State is conducting a recount; Wisconsin just announced the details and costs of a forthcoming recount; Michigan is buried in litigation supported by many sworn affidavits alleging irregularities. None of these states consummated their elections on November 3rd. The elections have failed, as a matter of law. The results should be voided. “Reading Foster v. Love, together with the 9th Circuit’s analysis in Voting Integrity Project v. Keisling, we know that consummating an election before federal Election Day is prohibited, and that early voting is not prohibited, as long as the election is finally consummated on Election Day. If that be the case, then statutory construction makes it obvious that elections consummated after Election Day are preempted by the federal Election Day statutes. “Any other construction would render the statutes inoperable. If “the election” – which is defined in Foster v. Love – as the combined acts of voters and officials – begins before Election Day, then continues after Election Day, there is no real Election Day. The statute would be utterly inefficient, and the plenary authority of Congress over the time to choose electors would be denied. There is no possible construction of the statute which would allow State elections for presidential electors to continue after Election Day.” Many thousands of votes were “discovered” days after the November 2020 election. Counting of votes in key swing states extended well beyond Election Day when counting of the ballots had to stop at midnight ON Election Day. On Nov. 5, 2020, Fox News reported, “The Postal Service failed to deliver 150,000 completed ballots to polling stations before Election Day, the Washington Post reported, including 12,000 in five of the states where the U.S. still eagerly awaits a final count.” Pennsylvania decided they would accept more ballot counting three days after Election Day as if the Foster v. Love Supreme Court decision didn’t exist. We cannot allow that to happen for the upcoming mid-term elections. It’s up to the candidates and their supporters to make their county elections official in charge of elections aware federal elections must be consummated ON Election Day as so decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. For a thorough, comprehensive education on the Fed, the income tax, education, Medicare, SS, the critical, fraudulent ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment and more, be sure to order my book by calling 800-955-0116 or click the link, “Taking Politics Out of Solutions“. 400 pages of facts and solutions. Order two books and save $10.00

[cowboyusa]

John 8:44.

[Oldeconomybuyer]

Standing. Laches. Moot.

[hardspunned]

I don’t know how you can say that. This miserable POS and his fellow travelers is very, very capable of stealing majorities in both houses through the courts. Someone better pay attention to these felons, I’m sure that putz Rona McDanial isn’t.

[katykelly]

Ditto

[Governor Dinwiddie]

Do they have a factory in New York City which produces these people? This guy's bio reads almost exactly like every communist Democrat operative/judge/lawyer/activist etc. in America:

Born to a Jewish family in New York City, Elias was raised in Suffern, New York.[7] He earned a Bachelor of Arts in government in 1990 from Hamilton College, at which he attended a class taught by Bernie Sanders.

He's probably a cousin of Julius and Ethel.

[moovova]

According to Harmeet Dhillon, on Tucker tonight, repubs are winning the majority of the cases. She should know....she’s been filling a lot of the cases.

[FreedomPoster]

I celebrate Juneteeth because of Julius and Ethel. That’s the day they were executed.

[Governor Dinwiddie]

#12: "I celebrate Juneteeth because of Julius and Ethel. That's the day they were executed."

LOL. I've got to remember that. No need to miss out on the festivities of the day!

[eyeamok]

Trump should exile him and the rest to North korea in 2024

[Liz]

‘OVER 98%’: TRUMP SPOKESWOMAN TOUTS THE
PRESIDENT’S INCREDIBLE ENDORSEMENT SUCCESS RATE
RSBN ^ | November 7, 2022 | Summer Lane
Posted on 11/7/2022, 9:11:19 PM by SoConPubbie

President Trump’s official spokeswoman, Liz Harrington, touted his incredible endorsement success rate during an interview on Newsmax heading into Tuesday’s midterm elections, citing “over 98 percent success the last two cycles.”

“These are such important races, and President Trump is so involved in these midterms,” Harrington said. “His endorsement rate is over 98 percent success the last two cycles. These are his candidates with his agenda – restoring common sense to America. So, we’ve got to win Tuesday and then we’ll see what happens.”

Trump’s Save America rallies have drawn jaw-dropping crowds all year.

President Trump has all but announced that will be running for president in 2024, but most conservative pundits have postulated that he will announce it after the midterm elections.

“I really believe we’ll get across the finish line in a great, red wave,” Harrington remarked in her comments to Newsmax.

Trump has consistently drawn thousands upon thousands of conservative voters and MAGA supporters to rallies across the country throughout 2022, establishing his endorsement as the gold standard of political conservative success.

According to a new poll from ABC News/Washington Post, the GOP is up on the Generic Congressional Ballot by at least two points. Additionally, a Washington Post 2022 midterms forecast projected that Republicans will take the Senate at 54 seats to Democrats’ 46, with GOP pickups in Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, and New Hampshire.

Their forecast also postulated that the House would swing Republican with 246 seats to Democrats’ 189.

[RedMonqey]

Sounds good,too bad nobody paid any attention to it.

[acapesket]

Who Is Nobody?
Try looking outside of your mini brain.. stop living in your own little world

[RedMonqey]

Show me who, where and when the powers that be gave it any credence.

[nicollo]

This douchebag was saved by a corrupt judge and Dim DC jury in the failed Durham prosecution of Sussman.

Elias would have been next: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/marc-elias-testifies-about-fusion-gpss-trump-russia-dirt-digging-in-sussmann-case

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

Again, with formatting!

Constitution says "Day" and means "Day". Supreme court says "Yep!" thats how we understand it!

Democrats say, NO! Count it over and over for as long as it takes to get the vote we like!

https://newswithviews.com/federal-elections-end-at-midnight-on-election-day/

Foster v Love, 522 U.S. 67, 71-72 is a 9-0 decision back in 1997 by the U.S. Supreme Court. They agreed to take up the issue of federal statutes vs state’s regarding election for federal offices and state election dates. The case that started it: MURPHY J. FOSTER, Jr., GOVERNOR OF LOUISIANA, et al., PETITIONERS v. G. SCOTT LOVE, PAUL S. BERGERON, KATHLEEN B. BALHOFF, and BENNIE BAKER-BOURGEOIS.
It’s rare SCOTUS has a 9-0 decision and this one surprised me considering the late Ruth Bader Ginsberg was on the bench back then. You can read the transcript of the oral arguments in Foster v Love here.

Quoting Ginsberg: “It is an election, and it seems to me, being an election it conflicts with the Federal single Election Day.” It’s unfortunate this was not the key argument in Trump’s lawsuits although several of us tried to get him this information.

Constitutional attorney, Ren Jander’s November 18, 2020 piece, Elections Undecided by Midnight are Void & Preempted by Federal Law – Foster v Love (1997; 9-0 Decision) is a thorough examination of that case and federal statutes. Jander wrote, “Federal Election Day statutes were designed to curtail fraud, and to infuse a prima facie sense of integrity in our electoral process. But these States – in failing to obey Congressional deadlines – have flagrantly attempted to preempt federal law. This is certainly prohibited, and this is why the late election results are void.”

After a comprehensive analysis of the Constitution, federal and state statutes, Jander further writes: “Consider all of the above in light of the results of the 2020 presidential elections; in Pennsylvania today, two weeks after Election Day, 8000 votes suddenly appeared, and the initial count is still not complete; Arizona has tens of thousands of ballots left to count in the initial canvass; Georgia discovered over 2600 missing votes yesterday, and the entire State is conducting a recount; Wisconsin just announced the details and costs of a forthcoming recount; Michigan is buried in litigation supported by many sworn affidavits alleging irregularities. None of these states consummated their elections on November 3rd. The elections have failed, as a matter of law. The results should be voided. “Reading Foster v. Love, together with the 9th Circuit’s analysis in Voting Integrity Project v. Keisling, we know that consummating an election before federal Election Day is prohibited, and that early voting is not prohibited, as long as the election is finally consummated on Election Day. If that be the case, then statutory construction makes it obvious that elections consummated after Election Day are preempted by the federal Election Day statutes.

“Any other construction would render the statutes inoperable. If “the election” – which is defined in Foster v. Love – as the combined acts of voters and officials – begins before Election