I can’t stand this fraudulent POS
Translation: I hope I hope I hope I hope I hope I hope
Read the indictment. Yes, Hillary did worse and Joe Biden is probably actively taking bribes from foreign countries (treason). But once in court, McCarthy is right: You cannot argue “But others did it too!”
What Hillary did was criminal and her friends protected her. Had she gone to a court in Oklahoma, she’d have been destroyed.
Trump IS being prosecuted and could face a DC jury. Even in Florida, there is enough evidence to convict - unless they can show the tapes were forged, etc.
Trumps lawyers probably quit because the indictment lays out solid reason for believing Trump lied to them so they would lie to the court. Lots of lawyers don’t like that at all.
https://www.justice.gov/storage/US_v_Trump-Nauta_23-80101.pdf
Re: 2 - What specifically is wrong with analysis?
Andy is controlled opposition.
He is an outstanding example of the Peter Principle.
He has never been right about one thing. But he is a perfect ‘expert’, along with Eddie Munster, for Fox.
I can’t, either. Nor can I stand Timber Rattler, whose just as big a POS.