Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans divided over 15-week abortion ban ahead of 2024
The Hill ^ | 07/04/2023

Posted on 07/04/2023 10:01:59 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

Republicans are split on whether their presidential contenders should embrace a federal 15-week ban on abortion as the party tries to find its footing on the issue going into 2024.

In a radio ad released Thursday in Iowa, Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) vowed to back a national 15-week ban on the procedure. That ad followed a call last week from former Vice President Mike Pence, who urged the other candidates to embrace a federal 15-week ban.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Indiana; US: South Carolina; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2024; abortion; ban; genderdysphoria; homosexualagenda; indiana; iowa; mikepence; penceisatraitor; plannedparenthood; republicans; righttolife; scotus; southcarolina; timscott; traitor; veestakes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
This ban talk isn't a winner
1 posted on 07/04/2023 10:01:59 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Let each state make it's own rules.

Stop using federal debt as a way to nationalize local decisions.

And place a time limit on Presidential Executive Orders; one year sounds about right.

2 posted on 07/04/2023 10:04:57 AM PDT by Bernard (“the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God." JFK 1-20-61)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

They’re trying to make sure they stay the minority party.


3 posted on 07/04/2023 10:05:57 AM PDT by rivercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I was thrilled when Roe v Wade was overturned.
I confess, I haven’t paid a lot of attention to the specifics afterwards, so I get confused.

I thought the great thing of Dobbs was that the issue had been taken away from the federal government and given to the states to decide. Since the Constitution does not discuss it, it then becomes a 10th Amendment situation, and MA can pass some laws, and Alabama can pass other laws. Seems to me that this is how things should be.

But the GOP seems to really want to return this to the hands of the federal government. I do not know why. I don’t see it as a good idea at all.


4 posted on 07/04/2023 10:07:15 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (It's not a government. It's a criminal enterprise. Fear it, but do not respect it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

It whould be no surprise that most all the GOP believes abortion is wrong morally but has more than one view about how best to translate that into secular laws. Meanwhile Dims generally deny any abortion limiting laws are right-, leaving all 100% to what a woman “chooses”.


5 posted on 07/04/2023 10:07:35 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
But the GOP seems to really want to return this to the hands of the federal government. I do not know why. I don’t see it as a good idea at all.

It's a stupid idea.

6 posted on 07/04/2023 10:07:52 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

Let the States decide


7 posted on 07/04/2023 10:08:15 AM PDT by escapefromboston (Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Do people understand what the Hill and other media propaganda pieces are doing here?
They’re trying to get Republicans to accept a false premise.
We won on abortion. It’s back in control of the states, as it always has been prior to 1973.
This is bait. This is pressure to get Republicans to accept abortion or else they’re extremists.


8 posted on 07/04/2023 10:10:40 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Trump and the RINOs want to protect abortion federally.

Sickening.


9 posted on 07/04/2023 10:11:31 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (This is the end of the Republic....because we could not keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

How about, and I know this is crazy, WE LEAVE IT TO THE STATES!?


10 posted on 07/04/2023 10:11:52 AM PDT by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The USSC sent it back to the States. That’s victory at the federal level. Most crimes should not fall under federal purview. Abortion is not an interstate issue.


11 posted on 07/04/2023 10:14:11 AM PDT by ConservativeInPA (Delay Trump’s trial, delay. Elect Trump President. Trump pardons himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

It all depends on the criteria people used to judge abortion.

There are Freepers on this site , who think that DeSantis is too liberal on abortion , because he signed a six week abortion ban in Florida. In their view we need an absolute ban on abortion.

Other Freepers say, how can we sanction killing babies in California or other liberal states , and that the issue is a life and death issue and we cannot abide liberal abortion laws in any state. Those people favor Federal abortion restrictions.

And other Freepers say, that abortion is not a winning political issue, and over turning Roe vs Wade and letting things be decidedd state by state , is the best we can do as far as reducing abortion in this country.

While the vast majority of people here on Free Republic appear to be pro-life, there is a lot of divided opinion as to what we should do politically about that issue.


12 posted on 07/04/2023 10:16:46 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Republicans have thought that it was the duty of [feds]government to defend life and liberty, via the Declaration of Independence. Just as they didn't support each state allowing slavery, or polygamy.
13 posted on 07/04/2023 10:16:57 AM PDT by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bernard

One year and/or the end of your presidential term.


14 posted on 07/04/2023 10:17:36 AM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

If Pence likes it. It’s likely a bad idea.


15 posted on 07/04/2023 10:17:51 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

no it is not.


16 posted on 07/04/2023 10:19:12 AM PDT by ronniesgal (friends don't let friends be Kardashians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bernard
Let each state make it's own rules.

Exactly. The SC Dobbs decision returned the power to make laws on abortions to the states. That's where the power belongs. Republicans need to leave this issue alone - it's fine the way it is.
17 posted on 07/04/2023 10:19:43 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

As Justice Alito’s excellent Dobbs decision points out, abortion isn’t in the US constitution, so any federal abortion ban would only apply to DC and the territories. Scott & Pence have just revealed themselves to be somewhat dimwitted.


18 posted on 07/04/2023 10:22:31 AM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The issue is a loser for electing Republicans. It motivates the radical feminists like nothing else.


19 posted on 07/04/2023 10:23:16 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (The rot of all principle begins with a single compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The issue is a loser for electing Republicans. It motivates the radical feminists like nothing else.


20 posted on 07/04/2023 10:23:19 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (The rot of all principle begins with a single compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson