Posted on 08/07/2023 8:41:08 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) called the federal indictments against former President Trump “exquisite” and “beautiful and intricate” in a new interview published Monday.
“The indictments against the president are exquisite,” Pelosi said in an interview in New York Magazine’s “Intelligencer.” “They’re beautiful and intricate, and they probably have a better chance of conviction than anything that I would come up with.”
Pelosi was referring to the two latest indictments against Donald Trump unveiled by special counsel Jack Smith.
Last week, Trump was arraigned on four criminal charges related to his efforts to cling to power after losing the 2020 election. In June, he was indicted over his retention of classified documents after he left the White House.
Trump has pleaded not guilty to all charges in both cases
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
thank goodness i believe in Divine Judgment. the Heat in her future will make her vaunted “global warming” look like child’s play.
She was behind the entrapment of the J6 people. She is the one who should be behind bars.
Her dementia is worse than JO JO’s. She’s hallucinating too. Unicorns and pink elephants!
No mention of “Innocent until proven guilty”, eh Nancy?
I guess the Left has no use for such an outdated concept. So simply discard it, along with free speech and the rule of law.
inappropriate language for a lawmaker to describe an indictment
Pray for her…..Psalm 28:4
You bet. It took a lot of hallucinating for "them" to "come up with this bull****".
Right. Grey matter getting a little fuzzy.
Nancy’s turn is coming one day (in Trump’s 2nd term).
well yeah - facts on Joe’s Ukraine dealings are in the process of unravelling Trump Impeachment #1 crafted by her and the Schiffster. not only did it not lead to conviction, it looks like it is going to be expunged. #Nance’sepicfail
I wonder if she realizes that these indictments set the pace for future indictments of politicians every time there is a change in party leadership. Is she supporting the US as a banana republic?
(Source: Federalist circa 2022)
The inspector general for the U.S. Capitol Police (USCP) has opened a formal investigation into whether the law enforcement agency tasked with securing the Capitol has been inappropriately surveilling elected members of Congress, their staff, and visitors to their offices, The Federalist has learned.
The opening of the investigation follows news reports and accusations from lawmakers that USCP has overstepped its bounds as it tries to recover from the January 6 riots that tarnished both the Capitol and the reputation of the law enforcement agency that was supposed to keep it safe.
In related - Pelosi’s Capitol Police are alleged to have illegally entered the office of Congressman Troy Nehls (R-TX), photographing confidential legislative products and grilling staff, according to reports. The police – now under formal investigation – stand accused of dressing up as construction workers and attempting another entry just two days later. Reports suggest Capitol Police have built intelligence dossiers on those illegally investigated.
OBSERVATION - Pelosi has converted the Capitol police into her how personal stazi. The incidents are egregious. Should the democrats lose the house in November, the incoming republicans should clean house an have heads roll (figuratively). This is another step taking govt agencies and targeting protected activity of citizens and their representatives.
In related, Representative Louie Gohmert has accused the DoJ of intercepting mail from his constituents and illegally holding it. In one case, mail was withheld from the Congressman for over four months. “It is gravely concerning that since Congressional mail is constitutionally protected under the Speech and Debate Clause of the Constitution, it could be routed, intentionally or not, through the highly partisan DOJ. This is felonious behavior.”
OVERALL OBSERVATIONS - These Capitol police and DOJ actions point to a more aggressive move by the biden/leftist govt against US citizens. If a CW2 scenario goes hot, the likelihood of active involvement by govt agencies skyrocket. It ceases to be a mere culture conflict between Red and Blue, but Fed Govt vs Red citizens/states.
Hell is ready to accept this wretched woman.
Nancy is a very sick Witch
What I would call exquisite and beautiful is seeing Nazi Pelosi in prison with the rest of the kkkommiecrats!
Hopefully it occurs soon!
How Catholic of her!
12 Questions the Justice Department and FBI Need to Answer About January 6
American Thinker | 7 Jan, 2022 | Julie Kelly
Posted on 1/8/2022, 7:45:17 AM by MtnClimber
Dear Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans:
The questions:
1) Why does the Justice Department consider 14,000 hours of surveillance video captured on January 6 by taxpayer-funded security cameras as “highly sensitive” government material? Why are even 30-second clips used in court proceedings under protective orders with strict rules about how defendants and their attorneys can view the evidence against them?
2) What is the status of the FBI’s lengthy investigation into the alleged “pipe bomber” and why, despite using every intrusive tool, including geofence warrants, to collect information on Capitol protesters, has the FBI not yet identified a suspect?
3) Is Ray Epps an FBI asset? If not, why has he not been charged despite clearly engaging in the same behavior that resulted in felony criminal charges against other January 6 participants?
4) Did the FBI run informants into alleged militia groups such as the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers before January 6? Can you confirm the New York Times reporting from September that disclosed at least two FBI informants were with the Proud Boys when they breached the first exterior barrier right before 1 p.m. on January 6?
5) Why is Stewart Rhodes—the founder of the Oath Keepers and “person one” in every indictment for the 20-defendant conspiracy case against the Oath Keepers—still not charged with any crime even though he clearly organized the alleged conspiracy and was on Capitol grounds on January 6?
6) Explain why the Justice Department, notwithstanding testimony to the contrary, had elite FBI forces stationed at Quantico the weekend before January 6. Hundreds of FBI agents were deployed to the area around the Capitol that morning and some entered the building with the first set of protesters who breached the actual building. Is this not a contradiction of what Justice Department and FBI officials previously testified under oath?
7) How many pre-trial detention orders has the Justice Department sought against January 6 defendants? How many remain behind bars right now? How many face nonviolent charges and have no criminal record? How can the Justice Department continue to ask for delays in trial dates for detained defendants—is this not a clear violation of the Sixth Amendment?
8) How many detainees have been held in solitary confinement conditions in the D.C. jail specifically used to house January 6 defendants?
9) Does any police officer face possible charges for excessive unlawful force, including the two D.C. Metro police officers who beat, punched, and maced Victoria White inside the lower west terrace tunnel on January 6?
10) Is there a formal investigation into the death of Rosanne Boyland outside that tunnel on January 6? Video and eyewitness accounts suggest she did not die of an accidental drug overdose but actually may have been the victim of police misconduct.
11) How many raids has the FBI conducted to arrest January 6 defendants and does this include Americans only charged with misdemeanors?
12) How much taxpayer money has the Department of Justice spent so far in what Merrick Garland called the agency’s largest investigation in history?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.