Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Carbon dioxide does not cause climate change. "No gas causes warming"
The Washington Times ^ | Wednesday, July 12, 2023 | James T. Moodey

Posted on 11/06/2023 6:53:40 AM PST by foundedonpurpose

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: Campion

Read the article and debate those points. Unless someone has been to those 3 places, that is non-proven scientific consensus, most likely proven through peer-review. Not hard facts.


21 posted on 11/06/2023 7:13:41 AM PST by foundedonpurpose (Praise Hashem, for his restoration of all things! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Politics aside, as an amateur historian and amateur Bible scholar, I find the chart fascinating to reference when I read about times in the past.

The Minoan Warm Period almost exactly corresponds to the Era of Judges (Moses to Samuel). The Greek Dark Age cooling period corresponds to the Era of Kings (beginning with King Saul). Jesus and His disciples lived in the Roman Warm Period. It was during the Dark Age cooling period that the Anglos and Saxons were displaced from Germany (call it my ancestors Trail of Tears). It was during the Medieval Warm Period that England really became a thing. The Little Ice Age cooling period was when it was too hard to do land routes from Europe to Asia (that, combined with the Barbary pirates and the Muslim takeover of Constantinople is why the King of Spain hired Columbus to see if one could sail west to Asia). The LIA was also the time of massive takeovers of many peoples as everyone was desperate for food (crop yields way down during the LIA and rain patters really hard to predict and large increase in deaths by plague). Both the massive African slave trade (300K to 500K brought to what we today call the U.S.) and the European slave trade (1 to 1.5 million whites taken to north Africa as slaves) were during this time.

Then the Modern Warm Period brought happier times with higher crop yields, more predictable rain, and less deaths by plague. We used to embrace it and be glad we lived in it. In fact, the political scam global cooling scare of the 1970's was an acknowledgement that the Modern Warm Period is a great time to be alive (the lie was them saying it was over and it wasn't going to last 4 to 6 centuries like the prior warming periods). NASA used to produce charts much like the one I post -- until the 1990's when Clinton/Gore directed govt money towards only the "research" that made the Modern Warm Period look both unique and bad.

22 posted on 11/06/2023 7:18:32 AM PST by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Campion

Surface temperature of Mercury (daylight side): 800 F

Surface temperature of Mercury (night side): -300 F”

goodness! I’ll try not to grumble on those days when Texas has a 40 degree swing in a 24 hour period!


23 posted on 11/06/2023 7:19:01 AM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: foundedonpurpose

>>There is no curriculum for gas physics in academia.

Actually, there is. I’ve suffered through the courses.

>>Kinetic energy (motion) is destroyed by gravity, another tenet of gas physics that has been ignored.

Total crackpot!


24 posted on 11/06/2023 7:24:50 AM PST by FarCenter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10
Please explain why greenhouse gasses like methane and CO2 fail to hold the heat down in the shadow of a midday solar eclipse of an otherwise warm sunny day.

It's not that methane and CO2 fails to hold the heat down in the shadow of a midday solar eclipse, it's how much does it absorb and re-radiate long IR waves, slowing the decrease in temperature.

In the vacuum of space, an object can go from hundreds of degrees to minus hundreds of degrees as fast as it can radiate IR when going from light to shadow. Add an insulating layer, and that radiation is slowed, thus slowing the rate of cooling.

25 posted on 11/06/2023 7:25:42 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: foundedonpurpose
Everything here causes global warming:

Nothing here causes global warming:


26 posted on 11/06/2023 7:26:17 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

“warming” is a silly word to use.

The context they are using is green house effect. Water vapor, for example, has a strong green house effect. It’s the reason why arid deserts get so cold at night even though they were so hot during the day.

CO2 has a negligible greenhouse effect and there isn’t enough of it to make a difference even if it was stronger.


27 posted on 11/06/2023 7:27:06 AM PST by z3n (Kakistocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: webheart
The atmosphere acts as a filter for incoming energy and an insulator for escaping energy. The gases don’t cause anything because they are passive.

How does an insulator work?

28 posted on 11/06/2023 7:27:24 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bert

Let’s be honest here. No one says the greenhouse effect operates ‘in the same way glass traps heat in a greenhouse.” The term “greenhouse effect” is purely metaphorical. It is a real thing, btw, but will not lead to the catastrophic scenarios being sold by the media for political purposes.


29 posted on 11/06/2023 7:27:58 AM PST by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: iamgalt

I notice that instead of discussing the facts you chose to violate FR guidelines with your personal attack.

Don’t post to me in the future.


30 posted on 11/06/2023 7:31:49 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bert

“ CO2 and water vapor prevent the outward radiation of heat from the earth in the same way class traps heat in a green house. Therefore the CO2 and moisture in the air are green house gasses.

That is the big but plausible lie”
**************************************************

Water vapor in the atmosphere will help retain (actually, it simply slows heat loss) atmospheric heat. Anyone who has spent anytime in a dry desert knows that the ambient air temperature plunges quickly at night with the absence of atmospheric humidity, CO2 is nothing compared to water vapor.


31 posted on 11/06/2023 7:33:10 AM PST by House Atreides (I’m now ULTRA-MAGA. -PRO-MA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: foundedonpurpose

I thought it started out stupid and quit reading it. I don’t believe in man mad global warming either.


32 posted on 11/06/2023 7:35:07 AM PST by Sequoyah101 (Procrastination is just a form of defiance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

Meanwhile the earth’s atmosphere keeps the average temperature near a cozy 300 degrees above absolute zero. Nighttime arctic lows are about 230 and desert highs are about 330 degrees Kelvin.


33 posted on 11/06/2023 7:35:11 AM PST by FarCenter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: iamgalt
You seem to be purposely distorting the meaning of the article. The point is blaming CO2 for a warming which doesn’t even exist is a willful lie.

I don't think I have purposely distorted the author's thesis.

It is his thesis that gasses do not create heat. Fiberglass insulation in your home's walls and ceilings do not create heat either.

Yet we know that fiberglass insulation is a barrier to the flow of heat, and we add it to our homes to slow the movement of heat either into or out of our homes, which is also what greenhouse gasses also do.

34 posted on 11/06/2023 7:36:59 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

“Clearly, gas causes warming.”

In the exact same way insulation heats your home for free, right?


35 posted on 11/06/2023 7:37:58 AM PST by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: foundedonpurpose

Doesn’t matter ehat the facts are, the left have invented their own “New Truth”, and the world has red it hook line and sinker

0.04% of our atmosphere is not, can not, cause global limited change- there isn’t nearly enough coverage I. The atmosphere to do so.


36 posted on 11/06/2023 7:44:55 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

> He is not distorting the fact that the author uses false statements in order to appear educated to the uneducated.<

His statements are no less false than the eggheads who told us CO2 causes global cooling. End fossil fuels. And the same eggheads who later told us CO2 causes global warming. End fossil fuels. Both cannot be true but both can be false.

EC


37 posted on 11/06/2023 7:51:01 AM PST by Ex-Con777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Con777

“His statements are no less false than the eggheads who told us CO2 causes global cooling.”

His statements, as previously shown, are totally false.


38 posted on 11/06/2023 7:56:23 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: bert

Cloud cover keeps the surface of the earth relatively cool by reflecting solar irradiation, that would warm the earth’s surface up if it got through, back into space.

Certain types of radiation from space nucleate clouds on earth by creating cascading collisions among molecules of gas high in the atmosphere. To the extent such radiation is deflected away from earth, we get less cloud cover, and average temperatures rise. To the extent such radiation is not deflected but is instead allowed to strike the earth’s atmosphere unimpeded, we get more cloud cover, and average temperatures drop.

In this regard, once again, the behavior of the sun determined which way we go, in terms of lesser or greater average amounts of cloud cover.

A more active sun from an electromagnetic perspective (the shorthand version of this is: gobs and gobs of sunspots before, during and after Solar Maximum), tends to extend its protection around earth more forcefully and consistently, thereby deflecting relatively more of the cloud-nucleating space rays, thereby decreasing the average extent and persistence of atmospheric cloud cover, thereby increasing average surface temperature.

The opposite is also observed.

A less active sun, from an electromagnetic perspective (the shorthand version of this is: a relative paucity of sunspots before, during and after Solar Maximum) tends to withdraw its protection around earth, or make it less consistent,, thereby deflecting relatively fewer of the cloud-nucleating space rays, thereby increasing the average extent and persistence of atmospheric cloud cover, thereby decreasing average surface temperature.

Yes, this knowledge and the research that produced it is actively being suppressed.


39 posted on 11/06/2023 7:56:55 AM PST by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MeganC
In the exact same way insulation heats your home for free, right?

Yes, in exactly the same way. It is the author's (and yours, I presume) thesis that since gasses do not create heat, they do not contribute in any way to the temperature of the Earth.

That is clearly a false conclusion.

To be clear, I do not believe that anthropogenic CO2 is causing catastrophic global warming. But I don't deny that gasses in our atmosphere do moderate our temperature swings between daytime and nighttime.

40 posted on 11/06/2023 7:59:57 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson