Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Franklin
Well SCOTUS refused to hear the Texas v. Pennsylvania brought under its original jurisdiction, and that was constitutionally required to have been heard.

That point is in dispute.

77 posted on 12/19/2023 11:17:14 PM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: Fury
That point is in dispute.

No, it's not:
"Public ministers of every class, are the immediate representatives of their sovereigns. All questions in which they are concerned, are so directly connected with the public peace, that as well for the preservation of this, as out of respect to the sovereignties they represent, it is both expedient and proper, that such questions should be submitted in the first instance to the highest judicatory of the nation. "

The Federalist No. 81, [28 May 1788]
78 posted on 12/20/2023 12:08:34 AM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson