Skip to comments.
The Supreme Court will decide if Trump can be kept off 2024 presidential ballots
MSN ^
| MARK SHERMAN and NICHOLAS RICCARDI
Posted on 01/05/2024 2:26:33 PM PST by nickcarraway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
To: nickcarraway
Get ready for the Communists’ “STACK THE COURT!” mantra.
2
posted on
01/05/2024 2:28:46 PM PST
by
CivilWarBrewing
(Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
To: nickcarraway
Good news. Thanks of posting. We will see who is who on the USSC.
3
posted on
01/05/2024 2:30:12 PM PST
by
PGalt
(Past Peak Civilization?)
To: CivilWarBrewing
Bingo! Like my insane in=laws, they believe the ends alway justify the means, even if it is totalitarianism.
To: PGalt
To: nickcarraway
Democracy dies with DemocRATS.
6
posted on
01/05/2024 2:32:32 PM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
To: nickcarraway
I don’t trust this court.
7
posted on
01/05/2024 2:33:18 PM PST
by
libh8er
To: nickcarraway
The Supreme Court said Friday it will decide whether former President Donald Trump can be kept off the ballot because of his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss,
I do not have the best memory at times. So forgive this ignorant question. Since when has it been illegal to challenge the results of an election? Is demanding a correction to a result one believes is fraudulent the same thing as trying to overturn a legit outcome?
8
posted on
01/05/2024 2:33:24 PM PST
by
lastchance
(Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
To: nickcarraway
“Donald Trump can be kept off the ballot because of his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss”
Trump didn’t try to overturn it like Democrats did with their Russia collusion hoax. All he said to do was to “protest peaceably”
9
posted on
01/05/2024 2:34:23 PM PST
by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(As long as Hillary Clinton remains free, the USA will never have equal justice under the law)
To: nickcarraway
Let the voters decide whether Donald Trump will be the nominee and not the courts.
10
posted on
01/05/2024 2:34:37 PM PST
by
No name given
(Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
To: CivilWarBrewing
I’m pretty much used to commies whining about everything, it’s all background noise to me at this point.
11
posted on
01/05/2024 2:35:09 PM PST
by
No name given
(Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
To: CivilWarBrewing
Cue Chucky “they will reap the whirlwind” Schumer.
But seriously, if the Court does the right thing, get ready for the nationwide riots.
12
posted on
01/05/2024 2:36:37 PM PST
by
Deo volente
("When we see the image of a baby in the womb, we glimpse the majesty of God's creation." Pres. Trump)
To: libh8er
I don’t trust this court.I don't either.
And I also don't trust any of the entities that have ordered Trump's name removed from ballots to follow any court order to return his name should the ruling be in Trump's favor.
They'll just ignore the ruling and argue that the Supreme Court is illegitimate.
13
posted on
01/05/2024 2:37:00 PM PST
by
Drew68
(Ron DeSantis for President. A conservative who fights and wins..)
To: nickcarraway
They pretty much had no choice.
14
posted on
01/05/2024 2:37:46 PM PST
by
CFW
(I will not comply!)
To: libh8er
Me either. Our government is under enemy occupation as far as I’m concerned, EVERYTHING is compromised, so I fully expect them to rule against Trump.
15
posted on
01/05/2024 2:38:17 PM PST
by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(As long as Hillary Clinton remains free, the USA will never have equal justice under the law)
To: CivilWarBrewing
This should be a No Brainer at 9-0 in favor of Trump.
However, I predict something less than unanimous. More like 6-3 in favor of Trump. Democrats are emboldened and have no fear of any repercussions from the people.
16
posted on
01/05/2024 2:38:56 PM PST
by
OHPatriot
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: nickcarraway
"The Supreme Court will decide if Trump can be kept off 2024 presidential ballots"
How does State government have jurisdiction over a Federal election?
17
posted on
01/05/2024 2:40:30 PM PST
by
clearcarbon
(Fraudulent elections have consequences.)
To: nickcarraway
I wonder if Chad Gore would be in agreement with DNC position. He actually got a recount.
18
posted on
01/05/2024 2:41:01 PM PST
by
Clutch Martin
("The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right." )
To: OHPatriot
I predict that Mizzzzz Justice Brow-Jackson will vote to allow removing Mr. Trump from ballots.
I think it not unreasonable to suppose that Ms. Justice Sotomayor will rule AGAINST removing Mr. Trump from ballots. She’s an odd duck.
19
posted on
01/05/2024 2:42:24 PM PST
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: No name given
It’s not about the nomination. It’s about the general election.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson