Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Victor Davis Hanson: Lawfare Against Trump Is Running Out of Gas
American Greatness ^ | 15 Jan, 2024 | Victor Davis Hanson

Posted on 01/15/2024 4:53:02 AM PST by MtnClimber

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: MtnClimber
The left can no longer scare people with claims that Trump will start a nuclear war or that he will crash the economy..

* * *

Yes, indeed.  Insightful comment, MtnClimber.  The Nation is hurting.  And Trump already proved he's adept at solving the international crises, border invasions, and economic stagnation/decline.

Go President Trump!

41 posted on 01/15/2024 4:51:56 PM PST by poconopundit (Kayleigh the Shillelagh, I'm disappointed in you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

I see. So how, then, do you define “lawfare”? Or are you saying that “lawfare” is a concept that doesn’t exist?


42 posted on 01/16/2024 11:51:51 AM PST by Ignatz (Winner of a prestigious 1960 Y-chromosome award!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz

Why do you believe it’s lawfare? I think that would help me to understand your position and respond accordingly.


43 posted on 01/16/2024 5:26:02 PM PST by joesbucks (It's called love-bombing. Claiming he's saving the world. This is a cult. Just back away. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

I didn’t say that I did believe it.

I’m not sure that such a term as “lawfare” exists as a legal term, even.
Collin’s American English Dictionary defines it as “the strategic use of legal proceedings to intimidate or hinder an opponent“, though Collins is silent on whether it is “legal” terminology or not.

Do you think that is accurate definition of the word “lawfare” as a concept?


44 posted on 01/17/2024 10:59:44 AM PST by Ignatz (Winner of a prestigious 1960 Y-chromosome award!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz

I think the definitions I’ve seen describe a concept. Based on perspective or bias I suppose one could see the current prosecutions as being that. But every case could likely be turned into some sort of lawfare claim. But from my perspective, this one’s a stretch.


45 posted on 01/17/2024 11:10:46 AM PST by joesbucks (It's called love-bombing. Claiming he's saving the world. This is a cult. Just back away. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

I understand what you’re saying, and agree with much of it.

What are your thoughts on lawfare’s ugly, codified cousin:
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.

Could that be argued in this case, do you think?


46 posted on 01/17/2024 1:36:16 PM PST by Ignatz (Winner of a prestigious 1960 Y-chromosome award!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz

I’d have to see the arguments. With the law, often what seems contrary is more clearly understood when fully articulated.


47 posted on 01/17/2024 2:18:17 PM PST by joesbucks (It's called love-bombing. Claiming he's saving the world. This is a cult. Just back away. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

That is true, you have to hear the case being made.
And no one has tried to make the “color of law” argument, at least not yet.

Thanks for your interesting perspective, JB.
It’s been a pleasure.


48 posted on 01/17/2024 8:29:27 PM PST by Ignatz (Winner of a prestigious 1960 Y-chromosome award!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Carriage Hill

It of course comes to question, what will happen to the “Preventers”? Will THEY be allowed to take office, and take over, as the very last election in American history becomes infamous history? I am not looking forward to any of this, if this is what we have to look forward to.


49 posted on 01/17/2024 8:34:09 PM PST by Thistledew (Prepare, for a future without Biden?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson