There’s a whole bunch of turds that Trump hired, enough to fill a footbal field sized cesspool. I’m not holding out any hope for improvement, either.
I’m a bit cynical on that as well...
I would then like to use that as the denominator, and place in the numerator those that sucked, and then multiply by 100.
The agitators are always happy to list the a holes picked, for good reason (on their part).What exactly is the percentage, and how different than any hiring practice and result, for any large cap corp?
Or are all hires anywhere else sterling examples of perfection?