P
The defendant's attorney has to testify? What are they going to ask her? “So ... what did he say to you in your office? Did he confess? Did he say anything incriminating? Do you think he's guilty? Tell us everything.”
The Ga. Senate should be investigating Kemp and ‘Ratenburger[sic].
who is Michel Wade? If that’s Nathan’s soon to be ex, why is her atty Bradley?
Lawfare chutzpah.
All other things aside, Bradley is either a moron or being vindictive. He threw his client under the bus by communicating about his client’s love life. Maybe there is some bad blood or jealousy there.
later
And then there is this, and may be the reason she is being summoned, this sure looks like Obstruction of Justice, Conspiracy to COmmit Perjury, COnspiracy to commit Fraud upon the Court, and WHY AREN’T THEY IN JAIL ALREADY?:
A new witness could testify Fani Willis warned lover Nathan Wade’s former business partner to stay quiet about their affair, an explosive new court filing claims.
“They are coming after us. You don’t need to talk to them about anything about us,” Willis is alleged to have warned Terrence Bradley in a September 2023 phone call.
The call was overheard by Cobb County, Georgia, prosecutor Cindi Lee Yeager, according to court papers filed Monday by Trump co-defendant David Schafer.
https://nypost.com/2024/03/04/us-news/fani-willis-warned-nathan-wades-lawyer-to-stay-quiet-witness/
It’s a RAT-pack so don’t expect justice to prevail.
This is part of the investigation of Fani and the gigolo by the state senate. According to CNN the testimony will be live-streamed this Wednesday morning.
Will most of you guys take a chill pill.
She wants to testify before the Georgia Senate committee. Getting a subpoena makes it much easier for her to say she didn’t have a choice.
"However, Bradley ducked questions while sweating bullets on the witness stand when questioned about text messages with information he previously leaked to Trump co-defendant Michael Roman’s attorney, Ashleigh Merchant, about Wade and Willis’ relationship. He did not answer the questions, claiming he didn’t know or could not recall any details, despite the evidence of text receipts." . . . I knew it was all over for Wade and Willis. It's time to call them toast!
All the “I’s” are dotted and all the “t’s” are crossed; no doubt fani is a criminal; so the judge either upholds the “rule of law” or the judge fails.