Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tired&retired
From the article:
Raffensperger appears to have broken the law as Trump called him.

The recording would seem admissible in a GA trial (a 1 party jurisdiction) inasmuch as it seems irrelevant that the call initiated out of state or was recorded out of state.

It is unlikely Trump called Chief of Staff Fuch's grandmother's house in an attempt to reach Brad unless Trump had a reasonable belief Brad was in Florida (a 2 party jurisdiction). But, if so, the recording would seem inadmissible in a Florida trial. (??)

35 posted on 03/09/2024 4:08:28 PM PST by frog in a pot (Sheriff Jones of Ohio tells us with hard facts why each one of us is a frog in a pot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: frog in a pot

The act of recording was illegal in Florida where it was done. The criminal and civil action for the illegal act of recording, and damages for anyone using the illegal recording would be in Florida.

In most states, the law holds those who use the illegal recording as also liable criminally.


36 posted on 03/09/2024 5:03:27 PM PST by tired&retired (Blessings )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson