Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: frog in a pot

The act of recording was illegal in Florida where it was done. The criminal and civil action for the illegal act of recording, and damages for anyone using the illegal recording would be in Florida.

In most states, the law holds those who use the illegal recording as also liable criminally.


36 posted on 03/09/2024 5:03:27 PM PST by tired&retired (Blessings )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: tired&retired
I like where you are going but am uncomfortable with agreeing that a 2 party state caller can call a 1 party state and claim protection from a recording.

Trump did not (we are told) call a Florida telephone number and Fuchs was not a party to the call and did not direct the course of the discussion. Moreover, what if the phone Fuchs used for the recording this business call while she just happened to be in Florida was her GA state issued business phone with of course a GA state number?

A significant GA state interest is at risk by simply moving Fuchs a few feet across the border. 1 party state callers who wish to exercise their recording rights would now bear the burden of knowing the exact location of every party to the call before recording. {;^)

37 posted on 03/09/2024 7:03:11 PM PST by frog in a pot (Sheriff Jones of Ohio tells us with hard facts why each one of us is a frog in a pot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson