Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What ‘Bring Chicago Home' referendum is, and how it would work
NBC 5 Chicago ^ | 3/18/24 | James Neveau

Posted on 03/19/2024 11:04:28 AM PDT by DallasBiff

Voters in the city of Chicago are being presented with a referendum on their ballots in the 2024 primary election, asking if they approve of a so-called “mansion tax” that would fundamentally change the way real estate transfers are taxed in the city.

The language of the "Bring Chicago Home" referendum asks voters to decide whether the city should move from the current flat tax model on real estate transfers to a graduated tax, which would impact real estate transactions on all value levels.

Supporters say that the ordinance would result in a reduction in the transfer tax for approximately 94% of properties in the city, but critics warn that it could have a devastating impact on the commercial real estate market.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcchicago.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: chicago; propertytax; realestate; transfertaz
So let me see if I have this correct, there is a tax which one sells their house in Chicago, they are charged a tax of 3% for every $500 of value, so if a house is sold in Chicago for $500,000 the transfer tax is $15,000.

Yes this proposal, reduces the tax by a %.25, but still a tax for selling your house, and it raises the tax on high end end housing and commercial properties?

Call me naive, but is this a common practice around the USA or just democrat cities, and I may not have the math correct.

Yes the democrats, can say they are cutting taxes, but they are screwing commercial property owners.

Chicago is effed up.

1 posted on 03/19/2024 11:04:28 AM PDT by DallasBiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Congress snuck a 3.9% tax on all real estate transactions into Obamacare. It’s still in effect.


2 posted on 03/19/2024 11:06:31 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“Occupy your mind with good thoughts or your enemy will fill them with bad ones.” ~ Thomas More)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

LOL Shitcago!


3 posted on 03/19/2024 11:10:55 AM PDT by Democrat = party of treason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

I think this was plan was detailed in the first chapter of “How to have all the wealthy people leave your state”.

I have a theory that the plan is to make things as bad as they can be, run off all the property owners, and then the government thugs will buy all this property on the cheap, and roll back all their crappy laws so that people can then come back and live/work in their properties.


4 posted on 03/19/2024 11:12:19 AM PDT by FrankRizzo890
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

And as usual with a catchy, misleading title to this crap law. The low info voters will go for it in droves.

Every time they think they are punishing the Kulaks, it backfires on the gimmedat class.


5 posted on 03/19/2024 11:18:03 AM PDT by AbolishCSEU (Amount of "child" support paid is inversely proportionate to mother's actual parenting of children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Any tax has unintended consequences. Liberals look at taxation as an inert, nonresponsive system. If we raise the tax, we will get more money. That almost never works. Taxation is not some solid, linear system. It’s alive and responsive to change.

What I see happening here is businesses moving away or not moving there in the first place. As to other ways around this particular tax, it’s not obvious to me, but I’m sure there are tax attorneys already figuring how to game the system.

The immediate effect may be that houses and commercial property will hit the market. People have probably been staying in the area out of inertia. They’ll see the future and flee before it’s too late.


6 posted on 03/19/2024 11:18:16 AM PDT by Gen.Blather (Wait! I said that out loud? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

I think most commercial real estate is dying anyway. If they try to stick it to commercial real estate transfers, they may find themselves with rotting decaying office buildings as they ignore the opportunity of purchase.


7 posted on 03/19/2024 11:21:11 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff
This bill combines the first two planks of the Communist Manifesto:

  1. Abolition of Property in Land and Application of all Rents of Land to Public Purpose.

  2. A Heavy Progressive or Graduated Income Tax.

https://www.conservativeusa.net/10planksofcommunism.htm

8 posted on 03/19/2024 11:29:51 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
I think most commercial real estate is dying anyway. If they try to stick it to commercial real estate transfers, they may find themselves with rotting decaying office buildings as they ignore the opportunity of purchase

Chicago meet Caracas, Venuzeala.

9 posted on 03/19/2024 11:31:42 AM PDT by DallasBiff (Apology not accepted.la is not the sharpest knife in the drawer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

The ignorant leading the blind following the stupid.


10 posted on 03/19/2024 11:33:42 AM PDT by Wuli (ena)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankRizzo890

Problem is, as has been for a long time, you won’t attract families back to Chicago because the public schools are dreadful. And real estate taxes are astronomical and will get worse. Corporate leadership and small businesses continue to leave, along with retirees and the wealthy. Nobody in their right mind, if they’ve left Chicago, would want to come back. Detroit on a grander scale, is in the making. A sad and tragic tale given Chicago was once a truly great city. Not anymore.


11 posted on 03/19/2024 11:33:49 AM PDT by john drake (Lucius Accius-Roman,170 BC - "oderint dum metuant" translated "Let them hate so long as they fear")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Not enough commercial property owners to change the election, but there are enough to pay for special laws to be passed :)


12 posted on 03/19/2024 11:42:03 AM PDT by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

I think it is $3.75 for each $500 of sale price (so about 0.75%). Still adds up though. Around $3,750 in the case of a $500,000 sale.


13 posted on 03/19/2024 1:00:03 PM PDT by evilC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

They all need to face firing squads.


14 posted on 03/19/2024 3:09:04 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff
This type of tax is used in places that have run out of other things to tax. It's common in the Chicago metro area. With the emphasis on high-end property, think of it as an exit tax on a rich person's personal residence.

With the escalator rate kicking in at 1 Million, people feel safe because "it's a tax on rich people houses." Good thing inflation will not increase the sales price of their house in the near future.

15 posted on 03/19/2024 5:57:30 PM PDT by Bernard (“God’s cruelest punishment is to let you reap what you sow.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson