Don’t try that in a small town.
Folks need to start up house-sitting businesses.
Thanks to Deep State, it’s riskier to allow a hone to remain unoccupied for long.
I have a house I’d like for them to squat in so I can burn it down on top of them.
more job creation for house sitters and guards............................
3rd world
... a problem that has a small caliber solution. Then call and make a ‘reservation’ for a clean-up ... think John Wick.
Or simply apply the well-known S-S-S rule ...
"In New York, for example, a squatter can be awarded “adverse possession” under state law if they have been living in a property for 10 years or more."
Across the river in New Jersey, squatters need to maintain possession for 30 (thirty) years.
This may be something that bizarrely applies to certain Blue cities in Blue states. (Or is a bizarre interpretation of statutes by crazy lawyers in certain Blue cities in Blue states.)
There are many neighborhoods in certain Blue cities in Blue states that nobody would ever notice a squatter even after 100 years.
CANNOT this ‘person’ be arrested for fomenting ILLEGAL activities ??????
I’m thinking that Moreno misunderstands the term “not inhabited” & intends to use what he thinks it says to take over someone else’s owned property. People like this need an abrupt introduction to American justice. Just a jail sentence is maybe not quite enough to insure his understanding of the term.