Replies

Covid 19 was an bio engineered virus that was released from the Wuhan facility.

This was 100% obvious by a review of relevant journal articles, research contracts and forensics on the virus itself.

The precise how's and why's of the virus development are still not fully understood in the public domain and what is known will probably be covered up and never made public but the fact that Covid 19 is bio engineered and was released on Wuhan is simply beyond dispute

Not sure how your qualifications stack up to mine but if you dispute those two basic facts I question your competence or your motives

[Covid 19 was an bio engineered virus]

AND, prior to 2019..... better download everything before it all disappears

What's not to trust?

Dr. Fauci ‘Prompted’ Scientists To Fabricate ‘Proximal Origins’ Paper Ruling Out Lab-Leak: House GOP Investigators -- "The authors of this paper skewed available evidence to achieve that goal..."

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4135961/posts

[Dr. Anthony Fauci - "who offshored banned gain-of-function research to make bat coronaviruses more transmissible to humans"]

Look at the eyes of the woman in the black. Then look at Fauci's eyes. He looks like he's adoring Barry.

"Test Vaccine in Non-Human Primates". - BEFORE Covid-19⁽⁸⁴⁾

As well you should question our DemMom (for some reason the autocorrect keeps trying to change that to demon). He/She/bot is the smartest, bestest lab genius ever!!!!! It is a gift to be able to use information about real vaccines and then try to substitute that for knowledge about the mRNA vaxes to misdirect from the truth. That kind of disinformation takes real skill to deny that there is actual gain of function or that this was designed on purpose.

Covid 19 was an bio engineered virus that was released from the Wuhan facility.
This was 100% obvious by a review of relevant journal articles, research contracts and forensics on the virus itself.

Do you have a list of references in the medical literature which show the experiments and data that show that SARS-CoV-2 was engineered?

Since my PhD is in biochemistry and molecular biology, I can assure you that any signs of genetic engineering of the virus are easy to find once one has the full sequence. The sequence of the original isolate of SARS-CoV-2 is available online in Genbank. You can plug that sequence into NCBI-Blast and do a search for what is called "vector contamination" in that sequence. There isn't any. (I did this already.) Other tell-tale signs of genetic engineering would be the presence of genes that are not associated with coronaviruses--there are none of those.

By the way, what I mean by "medical literature" is articles that are peer-reviewed, published in reputable journals, and indexed in PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Any journal article that describes the evidence of bio-engineering of the virus absolutely must contain the relevant sequence data and analysis that led to the conclusion that this virus originated from something other than a natural source.