Skip to comments.
U.S. claims intelligence coup
Excite ^
| 10/21/2001
| Brian Williams and Sayed Salahuddin
Posted on 10/20/2001 5:46:47 PM PDT by Merovingian
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: Merovingian
If they've discovered something very important, it's not all that bright to shout it from the rooftops, especially when there's no need to do it.
2
posted on
10/20/2001 5:51:42 PM PDT
by
dr_who
To: Merovingian
bump
To: Merovingian
While other Taliban command posts were bombed during U.S. strikes on Afghanistan that began on October 7, this one was untouched by the bombardment and viewed by the U.S. military as a potential stash of intelligence. So, if this is correct, what our people have been doing is purposefully leaving certain areas untouched so that the Taliban will concentrate there because they view those areas as 'sanctuaries'.
To: dr_who
Don't worry. It's just Psy-Ops.
5
posted on
10/20/2001 5:55:37 PM PDT
by
BenR2
To: dr_who
I think it is good for morale to show that we pounced on information we knew was there. They do not know what we have learned. I would be happy knowing nothing. However, news sources want some raw meat every so often.
6
posted on
10/20/2001 5:57:24 PM PDT
by
Chemnitz
To: BenR2
Sometimes we will tell them truths that they know; sometimes we will tell them truths that they do not know; sometimes we will tell them truth and lies; and sometimes we will tell them only lies.
7
posted on
10/20/2001 6:02:07 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
To: Chemnitz
However, news sources want some raw meat every so often.Yes, and you can bank on it that this information dissemination serves the purposes of our military in more ways than one.
To: Chemnitz
Sure, but they ought to put the intelligence coup to the fullest possible use before they think about making any announcements. In the unlikely event that a significant increase in opposition to this war occurs within a month's time, the morale boost might be more useful. But we're trying to avoid the mistakes of the Gulf War (and WWI, etc). It just seems to me that measures shouldn't be acceptable, even if the president's approval rating drops to 75% from 97%.
9
posted on
10/20/2001 6:08:24 PM PDT
by
dr_who
To: Merovingian
The writing is on the wall. These Fu---rs are Toast! I hope we don't stop until any possible terrorist group or state is removed.
10
posted on
10/20/2001 6:10:11 PM PDT
by
cactmh
To: BenR2
I guess I hope so. I'm just as eager to hear good news from the front as the next guy I guess.
11
posted on
10/20/2001 6:10:57 PM PDT
by
dr_who
To: dr_who
I agree with you. But even wars are political and require some PR.
12
posted on
10/20/2001 6:39:06 PM PDT
by
Chemnitz
To: dr_who
If they've discovered something very important, it's not all that bright to shout it from the rooftops,Yeah, the enemy might find out that you found something...er, ah, maybe they already know you found something.
13
posted on
10/20/2001 6:43:54 PM PDT
by
FreePaul
To: Chemnitz
Sure, but that missile attack on Pakistan was a prime example of a "PR war". America is behind Bush. He should take advantage of that and be brutally efficient. If the Taliban knows just what this "intelligence coup" is (a hiding place, for instance), it becomes abundantly clear to them where they need to concentrate their remaining defenses. That endangers troops, thus hurting morale back home.
14
posted on
10/20/2001 6:53:11 PM PDT
by
dr_who
To: FreePaul
If you're looking for PR war fodder, show the press Omar's Playboy magazine collection, wine cellar, and opened cans of Vienna sausage pulled out of a dumpster behind his pad.
15
posted on
10/20/2001 7:03:17 PM PDT
by
dr_who
To: Merovingian
U.S. claims intelligence coup Is that another way of saying they didn't bring back any scalps?
16
posted on
10/20/2001 7:26:20 PM PDT
by
The Duke
To: dr_who
You can never have too much deception in war. I agree with you. However, no one listens to me!
17
posted on
10/20/2001 7:52:09 PM PDT
by
Chemnitz
To: Chemnitz
Good point. I for one don't. Heh, heh, heh.
18
posted on
10/20/2001 8:14:23 PM PDT
by
dr_who
To: Merovingian
"We gathered up some intelligence, some items, and we're going to evaluate that," he said. I have to think that there's at least one "who" among the items.
19
posted on
10/20/2001 8:19:42 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: Merovingian
" "We are eagerly awaiting the American troops to land on our soil, where we will deal with them in our own way," said Haqqani, a veteran mujahideen, or holy warrior. "
Beware of what you may wish for. Oh, and by the way, just how good are holy warriors if they are vaporized? Seems you might have a problem or two using a melted AK-47 IMHO.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson