Skip to comments.
NTSB News Conference
MSNBC
Posted on 11/12/2001 9:26:15 AM PST by Merovingian
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 161-172 next last
To: Ymani Cricket
The nose came off, hit a wing , and caused the wing to break off the tail, but as the tail got caught in a whorl wind it flew backwards and took out the other wing. OR , a UFO landed on the back of the plane, and the weight of the craft caused the plane to crack like an egg. OR, it was a mutant bird ,from drinking the poluted waters of the Hudson, that pooped on it, causing the pilot to lose site of where he was driving.
All ideas are just as believable.
I think the pro-accident theories are wilder than the pro-terrosist theories.
Please, keep typing.
To: ladyinred
>One question, How could they possibly know already, and actually right after the crash, that it was not a terrorist attack?<<
Exactly. Whenever the plane paieces were still scorching and too hot to touch, we were reassured that there was no evidence that this was a terrorist attack.
Yes, there is. The WAR we are in, coupled with threats of planes raining from the sky, plus the "coincidences" that are eerily similar to Sept. 11.
I AM SICK OF THE "POWERS THAT BE" TREATING US LIKE WE ARE THREE-YEAR OLDS!
Please copy, email, print, send to any American you care to. Never forget.
To: FreeReign
It's perfectly reasonable for posters here to question whether the NTSB or the FBI is spinning the story to meet some political objective, but you and the little muslim cheerleader here, John H K, are apparently incapable of grasping that. Good propaganda consists mostly of truths, half-truths and ommisions, not out-and-out lies. Read Goebbels on the subject.
To: JmyBryan
Members are not political, just engineering types. NTSB chairman James Hall is not an engineering type, but a political hack from near the same backwoods as x42. He presided over the TWA 800 cover-up.
To: concerned about politics
Next time your kid gets sick, try the eye of newt or tenderloin of ragweed.
Nothing personal, but it concerns me you would be concerned about politics...... ourpolitics....
To: MindBender26
Bite me.
To: Gargantua
The one things the keeps amazing me is how easy it is to pick out you mental midgets and scenario suckers....
I bet you just love it when the vitamin salesman comes to the door......
To: MindBender26
Bite Gargantua too.
Comment #109 Removed by Moderator
To: Clinton's a rapist
The judgement process of Clinton's a rapist--->
It's perfectly reasonable for posters here to question whether the NTSB or the FBI is spinning the story to meet some political objective, but you and the little muslim cheerleader here, John H K, are apparently incapable of grasping that. The NTSB says "x". Posters say that the NTSB says "Y". I point that fact out. Let the record show that you've now misrepresented what I've said three times. Your judgement skills are very clear now.
Comment #111 Removed by Moderator
To: Merovingian
It doesn't matter what the NTSB, the White House or the FAA says. Most folks around here have already decided. It was terrorism. In fact, the more the government says it looks like a regular aviation catastrophe, the more the conspiracy theorists will say they're lying. Unless of course they say it was terrorism. Then they'll believe the governement. Funny, that. You can't trust the government unless it tells you what you want to hear.
What a bunch of sad cases.
Comment #113 Removed by Moderator
Comment #114 Removed by Moderator
To: MindBender26
Mental midgets? Like me?
Right. Keep dazzling us all with your brilliance, okay? The whole office here is laughing at you, genius. As is the cyber-world in general.
To: marshmallow
Obviously, the reports coming in from official sources are continuing to conflict with one another. Everyone hears what they want to hear.
To: FreeReign
Well, let's take a recent example of government propaganda and see if your tiny brain can comprehend it. When Bob Stevens contracted inhalation anthrax, the first case in the United States in 25 years, the authorities repeatedly stated that they had "no evidence" that he was the victim of terrorism. They repeatedly brought up the fact that he was a "keen outdoorsman," which is, for all I know, a true statement. At no time did they mention that he lived less than a mile away from Mohammed Atta's favorite airfield in South Florida.
Do you understand how this works now, and why the posters you criticize are right to be skeptical and why you have contributed nothing worthwhile to the discussion?
To: right_to_defend
why not say "there's no evidence it was an accident"? Surely it should be treated as a terrorist attack until that is ruled out. It's when they say they are treating it as an accident first, that people get suspiscious about their motivations
Look, the airline industry is in a very serious situation right now. Planes are crashing but they need people to fly this holiday season. So, think of it as evolution in action. The dumb people fly, and the smart people don't. Accidents, terrorists, who cares? A dead passenger is a dead passenger.
118
posted on
11/12/2001 12:42:57 PM PST
by
cgbg
To: coloradan
I believe he was an insurance salesman.... knows NOTHING at all about science , technology or engineering or forensic reconstruction... Nothing... we are talking about Clintoonia's NTSB Chief who is still on the job...
To: marshmallow
BELIEFis a powerful thing..and dangerous. If more folks would stick only to facts (and sometimes we never learn all of the facts), there would be less contention. Anyone with a brain knows that just because I believe something, that does not make it truth, actuality, or FACT.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 161-172 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson