DISGUSTED....(account of anti-global D.C. protest)

I'd planned on writing a fairly mocking narrative of my day as an anti-globalization protester. And, in fact, there were some humorous moments -- there's lots about these morons that's worth mocking. But I gotta' say, for the most part, the experience gave me a wrenching stomachache. And had I stayed much longer, there'd probably be other body parts hurting, too, because it was all I can do to bite my tongue, and not jump headfirst into the fray.

I got to Dupont Circle at about 10:30am. I was to meet a friend there before heading over to the IMF protests. There were a smattering of pro-Palestine signs, a few people sipping coffee and reading the paper, and lots of cops on bicycles in riot gear. A half dozen people calling themselves "Iranian Leftists" unfurled a large banner depicting an exed-out Israeli flag. Two little boys, probably not more than ten, held the banner and posed in front of the Dupont fountain with grins, while an older man -- likely a dad -- snapped pictures. It was still relatively quiet.

There were two demonstrations this morning. The first, kicking of at 10:30, was the pro-Palestine rally. My friend Bryan and I didn't have much interest in attending that one. Mainly, I guess, because I'm not entirely sure where I stand on the Middle East. Instead, we headed to 18th and H, for the anti-globalization march. In the end, it didn't matter. By noon, all the demonstrations had converged.

The original plan was to do some demonstrating ourselves, to work our way in, then hopefully have some humorous stories to tell about the twisted logic, misplaced anger, and market ignorance of the militant left. When we got to the site, we realized we wouldn't even be able to fake it. The stupidity was so overwhelming, the activism so empty and boneheaded, we were awed to silence.

"Bush Is Hitler," read one sign. "Free Trade=Holocaust" read another. "IMF, International Mother Fucker," read one particularly uncreative poster. One guy dropped all pretense and went with, simply, "Fuck America." Drum circles broke out, and just in front of us, a quintuplet of spiraling, hairy college girls in sundresses and sneakers began chanting something about "profit is the enemy," and "George Bush is a ho! IMF has got to go!"

In my mind, I've always thought that leftist protest events inevitably yield hot, free spirited hippie chicks. Isn't that the way it is on TV? You know, girls with lose morals, lose clothes, and long, flowing, sun bleached hair? Forget it. Was I ever wrong. We got unshaved fat girls falling out of their clothes. And that's about it.

We wandered around a bit. A guy in his fifties with a braided beard and a girl who could've been his daughter walked through the demonstration, holding hands -- on three foot stilts. We passed a fat man dressed up like a cheerleader, and a girl in her teens dressed up like a cop, who handed out anti-World Bank fliers. We got a little worried. Where we supposed to come in costume?

After ten minutes or so, a kid in glasses wearing a "Nerds Against War" button asked us we were "interested in justice." Well, of course. Who isn't?

"Justice," it turns out is the official newspaper of the Socialist Alternative, a group that demands, among other things: 30 hour work weeks, $12.50/hour minimum wage or $500/ week (whichever is greater), public ownership of the 500 largest companies in the country, and immediate cancellation of the public debt, with zero payoff to "big investors."

"Really? That's so fucking cool. I admire that. But I can't give these out for free. They'll make me pay for them. Maybe your friend has a dollar?"

He then asked if we needed "legal aid," the phone number of a free legal service he'd written on his arm, in the event he was arrested.

On the main stage, a woman from Fiji had just finished reading an "indictment" of the "north" for pilfering resources from the "south," leaving the "south" impoverished, diseased and destitute, while the "north" lives in privilege, wealth and comfort.

Not quite. As it turns out, by "north" she meant "western thought," and by "south," she meant "third world."

After Ms. Fiji's incoherent ramblings, an Egyptian feminist took the stage, and attacked the World Bank for unfairly tying aid to neoliberal reform (if only!). She followe dby saying that it's time to bring George Bush and Ariel Sharon before the International Criminal Court for war crimes. How the two are related is beyond me. Speaker after speaker followed -- with screed after screed -- as corporations, Europeans, Jews, George Bush (Jr. and Sr.), the founding fathers, the media, materialism, Jesus, and western values were blamed for Vieques, Palestine, poverty, teen angst, disease, heartburn, acne, and the "Seinfeld curse."

One girl was handing out small hand signs with this picture cut out and pasted to a Popsicle stick. Beneath her picture read "She Is Not the Enemy." Curious, I approached her.

"Do you know who that woman (the womam is the Afghanistani whose face appeared on the cover of National Geographic) is?" I asked.

"Yes," the girl said. She was redheaded and freckled, and she wore an American Flag for a top, with a "No War With Iraq" button pinned to her chest.

"Yes. She's an oppressed woman. She's the face of U.S. oppression of the third world."

"No," I said. "She's a Pashtun Afghani. She was photographed by National Geographic in the '70's (I was a little off here -- the link above says it was in 1985). The photographer's been searching for her for twenty years. He couldn't find her because, well, because it's tough to find a woman in a country where women aren't permitted to show their faces in public. It wasn't until the U.S. military came in, and rid Afghanistan of the Taliban, that she could come out from behind her veil. The photographer finally found her last year, in a Pakistani refugee camp."

"Yes, but she's just one woman. She's just one oppressed woman. There are so many more."

There then was some commotion behind us. We started toward the activity, near 18th St., just in front of Starbucks. As we approached, (mostly) white kids in scarves and black bandanas wore wide grins and retrieved cameras from their backpacks. Jet black smoke spiraled up from the midst of the melee.

Bryan and I stood in front of an eight-foot paper mache contraption that had built into it several drum faces made of various materials to produce a wide range of sounds. Two guys blew hard into trumpets (they were pretty damned good), while a motley crew of protesters pounded the drums into a monotonous rhythm. Others joined in, beating on buckets, empty water coolers, trash cans -- whatever was handy, and made a nifty sound. The chaotic drumming, from all over the street, settled into a pattern: pa-pa-de-pa-pa, pa-pa-de-pa-pa, pa-pa-de-pa-pa-pop. The rythym got a little hypnotic, and bore a rather thick groove in my head.

A few minutes later, a swath cut open in the mob behind us, allowing us to finally see what the fuss was about. A kid in a face scarf, cargo shorts and black gloves was holding an American flag that he'd set aflame. A second flag was afire, too, already on the ground, mostly ash. College kids gathered around the flag on the street, zooming with video and digital cameras, snickering, stomping on the ashes, and elbowing one another. A middle aged guy slithered up next to the kid holding the flag, smiled wryly, and began asking him questions while scribbling on a reporter's notebook. But this guy was hardly a reporter. He sported a "Drop Debt, Not Bombs" t-shirt. He chatted for a moment or two more, then patted the kid's shoulder and sank back into the crowd.

When the opening let the mass behind us see the flaming flags, they too cheered, and more protesters -- nearly all of them college-aged -- lurched forward to get pictures.

I've never seen a public flag burning before, despite a couple of years now living in D.C. I've always (and still do) thought movements to ban flag burning were a colossal waste of time and misplaced energy. But believe me, watching one burn, in person, does some crazy things to you. Especially when the flag burns while snotty middle class kids take pictures and giggle and hi-five one another. It was more insulting than I'd ever imagined. I was personally offended.

And for a moment, to be honest, it was surreal -- sort of dreamlike, spurred by the incessant rhythms thumping on behind me. But lots of anger soon made itself apparent. None of this was all that funny any more. Mostly, I wanted to pound these smug little shits. These kids weren't even pissed off. They weren't outraged. They were smiling. This was a social event. They were snapping pictures. They were haughty and self-satisfied and completely content with their ignorance. Smarmy bastards.

We walked away, mostly because we both feared that if they attempted to burn another one, we'd have intervened, and likely wound up in the hospital.

We walked past the blue line, up the eventual march route. We circled around, and found ourselves in the midst of the Palestine rally.

As I wrote above, I'm still of a middling position on the Middle East. I'm certainly more pro-Israel now than I was a few months ago. But I'm still too aware of legitimate gripes on either side to take a strong position. That said, the Palestine rally was infinitely more legitimate than the anti-globalization rally. These weren't clueless college kids, ignorant of the very issues that allegedly inspire them. The Palestine protesters were knowledgeable, passionate, and peaceful. Yes, they were loud. And some of the signs and symbolism went over the top. One sign, for instance, said, "A suicide bomber is no more than a poor man's F-16." Further up in the demonstration, the crowd carried an unwieldy makeshift pine coffin, with a real little girl inside (she looked terrified). Nevertheless, you did at least sense genuine feeling in the crowd -- real sadness, real loss, real perceptions of injustice.

Unfortunately, the two demonstrations met, turning the entire uptown area into a activist stew of random causes, screams and protests. Palestinian flags flew next to signs excoriating Citibank and Monsanto. The crowd was anti-wealth, anti-racism, anti-terrorism, anti-war on terrorism, anti-poverty, anti-drug war, anti-Israel. All the messages blurred together. The few legitimate causes were quickly swallowed up by the insipid ones. Effigies of Bush and Ashcroft hung from poles backdropped by "Cannabis Isn't Criminal" signs.

When the cops rolled in on motorcycles, we decided to leave. I think I need a shower.

The stupidity was so overwhelming, the activism so empty and boneheaded, we were awed to silence.

My sentiments exactly.

We got unshaved fat girls falling out of their clothes.

The pretty girls are all conservative!!!

The crowd was anti-wealth, anti-racism, anti-terrorism, anti-war on terrorism, anti-poverty, anti-drug war, anti-Israel.

The blurr is very good for the conservative movement. Bringing together all the anti-s with each having their own cause can only lead to them starting to eat their own.

At the PLO rally I found it quite funny that the radical black muslims were together with the few american indians with a gripe next too the Satmar Hasidic Jews next to the future terrorists....

I'm not in complete agreement with the blogger, but his writing makes me remember why I love the internet.

"One sign, for instance, said, "A suicide bomber is no more than a poor man's F-16." Further up in the demonstration, the crowd carried an unwieldy makeshift pine coffin, with a real little girl inside (she looked terrified)."

I hope these protests get lots of coverage. People who are uninterested in politics need to have this easy choice: the Bush White House, or the loony, disconnected Left. There's no way any of today's coverage on C-span could have helped the Leftists' cause. As I noted on another thread, hardly one person could have sat there in the audience without being offended by something. The speakers on the stage were clearly pro-fascists, nary a one regreted the fall of the freakin' Taliban for god's sake. How could hippie/peace-nik wannabees support the Taliban or regret the liberation of Afghanistan? Or , for that matter, the coming over-throw of the aptly named fascist Palestian Authority?

I used to think, well , these kids who march in the street have some good, albeit bogus heros who appeal to their idealism. Good kids of the USA love 'liberation' movements, and sympathize with the poor . Fine and good ! They're misguided now, about the difference between Nazism and Communism (so similiar) and want to have their moment of righteousness. But how any honest John Lennon-loving, silly college student could possibly join in those chants today is beyond me. What we saw on C-span was comparable to the 1930's Madison Square Garden American-Nazi rally we see in the old newsreels. The people on stage were not radical, freedom loving Americans at all! They were malevolent anti-Americans. Ironically calling for the "liberation" of Palestine, which is bound to become another totalitarian state. Not only totalitarian, but theocratic!

Thanks for the post. The writing reminds me of the New Yorker's good days, back a couple hundred years ago.

I'm not in complete agreement with the blogger, but his writing makes me remember why I love the internet.

In the good old days, some network airhead would interpret the actions of these spoiled, adolescent brats, and imbue them with some form of moral righteousness that would somehow make them seem more enlightened and better than the rest of us. Thanks to God and Al Gore, those days are over.

I think the whole point of doing the "Hate America" pep rally was to provoke a confrontation. Without some kind of violence from the people they were trying their best to insult....their get-together was a big fat failure. They are just a bunch of silly little communists...serving up the same tired old leftovers from the forties.

When you stop and think about it.....the only power they have is the ability to infuriate. If you want to drive them crazy....laugh. They hate not being taken seriously.

Moreover, I'm also talking about a viewpoint that IS NEVER SHOWN to the American people. To fight the IMF and "free trade" is to be a person like these people mentioned in this article, people whose viewpoint gets all kinds of coverage, not to be a person like me.

My thoughts exactly. Maybe these folks are like their hero, Karl Marx. I must say that he sometimes stated a problem very well. It was his solutions to the problem that scared hell out of me. I wouldn't be caught dead protesting with this rabble.

"In the good old days, some network airhead would interpret the actions of these spoiled, adolescent brats, and imbue them with some form of moral righteousness that would somehow make them seem more enlightened and better than the rest of us. Thanks to God and Al Gore, those days are over."

I've heard that the polls showed that the public still supported the Vietnam war even to the last days. It's a painful subject. Did you know that in the 1970's people believed that the U.S. would eventually become an "enlightened" socialist society, and capitulate to the Soviet world-view? This was partly due to the laughable sophistcation of our media back then.

Yes, thank god for the internet. You have to judge for yourself your reliable sources, but here on FR, we can link and investigate and have a dandy time exposing liars. I'm glad I've lived to witness this cooperation in finding the truth.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.