[Antoninus]

I thought you religionists said it was the act, not the person.

If one does not engage in homosexual acts, one is not a homosexual. Healthy individuals do not define their personhood based on what they do with their genitals. A celibate Catholic priest can not be a homosexual because he has voluntarily given up any pretense to a sexual 'identity' in order to properly serve Christ.

[BikerNYC]

If one does not engage in homosexual acts, one is not a homosexual.

If a virgin teenage boy gets sexually aroused by the thought of being intimate with a pretty girl who lives next door, would it be fair to call him a heterosexual?