Whatever Happened to the Danny Williams saga???

NewsMax.Com ^ | 6/13/02 | me

[urtax$@work]

Reading an item today from NewsMax, the subject was Stephanopoulos Gets Frosty Welcome. The article mentioned the Danny Williams story. Veteran ABC News commentator George Will didn't sound particularly happy Thursday morning that his "This Week" co-panelist George Stephanopoulos would soon be taking over as host, saying he doesn't care who's running the show anymore………

The allegation that Bill Clinton had fathered Little Rock youth Danny Williams did eventually prove to be false - at least according to an incomplete DNA comparison performed by Star Magazine three years ago………

[urtax$@work]

So, does any Freepers have later news on D.W. ??

[arthurus]

It did NOT prove to be false. The medical report of the results of BC's DNA results was altered to avoid giving out information that could be used by others. It was illustrative only to indicate that certain information was indeed correct without publishing the actual DNA numbers.

[Lockbox]

Last I heard the DNA of Danny Willimas did not match Bill. Then the question was raised was the DNA information provided in the court documents actually Bill's, or did the Secret Service 'modify' the document DNA to protect the President. So since a real sample of Bill's DNA was never provided, a real DNA test has never been performed. Only a comparison of court provided DNA, which may or may not be Bill's actual DNA.

Now that I answered your question can you answer one for me?

What is the definition of “IS”. I’m confused on that one......................

[Cicero]

The clintonoids sprang a very clever trap on Murdoch and Drudge. They pushed the Danny Williams story in a supermarket tabloid which earlier had broken some damaging stories on clinton but since had been bought up by Roger Altman, a clintonoid. Drudge and the NY Post climbed on board, announcing in giant headlines that a huge story was about to break matching Danny Williams' DNA to clinton's DNA as described in the Starr Report. Then, when they had been suckered in, the clintonoids announced that the DNA didn't match after all. Drudge was forced to apologize and Murdoch backed down. The New Yorker published a snide comment on the "mistake," as did Time Magazine. Now, no one will touch the Danny Williams story with a ten-foot pole.

Only trouble was, the DNA data in the Starr report was faked. It was not clinton's DNA, because it was thought to be a security risk to release his real DNA information. So all that was proved was that Danny's DNA didn't match a fictional DNA. Naturally not.

Around about that time, there was a story published in a UK newspaper saying that clinton visited a pub and when he had drained his beer, a secret service agent confiscated the mug. Presumably, it was to keep his DNA a state secret.

So, the whole story was a clever fake. But no newspaper is going to risk getting bitten again.

[Cacophonous]

Either that or Clinton wanted the mug, and having the SS agent steal it for him woulf raise fewer questions than if he had actually walked out with it himself.

[AppyPappy]

I don't think Clinton can have kids. If he could, he would have lots of them.