Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UbIwerks
Did he now -- the closest I've seen to that claim was that she dumped him because of his "unpredictable moods and bizarre obsession with homosexual magazines".

Do you have a source that he ever admitted to being homosexual?

79 posted on 08/31/2002 6:24:13 AM PDT by JoshGray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: JoshGray; lentulusgracchus; one_particular_harbour; madg; EdReform; UbIwerks; Tom Bombadil; ...
Regarding the attacks against Drs. Cameron and Reisman, it is my impression that the Gay Left, like the many other splinter factions bound together on the Left by hatred for all things traditional and Judeo-Christian, have certain tactics that they fall back upon when the fact aren't in their favor -- which is pretty much all the time.

It's as though the Left has an official playbook, like the playbook that football coaches hand out to their players on the first day of practice. And it appears that Page One of the Official Left-Wing Playbook says: "Distort something that your conservative opponent said into something that is either stupid or evil, and shove it back into his face."

Page Two of the Official Left-Wing Playbook says: "It doesn't matter that you've never seen your conservative debate opponent face to face, and that you actually live hundreds, or even thousands of miles away from him. It doesn't matter that you know absolutely nothing about him aside from the fact that he doesn't agree with you. And it doesn't matter that your entire training in psychiatry consists of one semester of Psych 101, in which you squeaked by with a 'C.' You are qualified to psychoanalyze him, and to return a diagnosis of some really dangerous mental illness." Hence the construction of the word "homophobia."

The tactics of the pro-homosexual side of this debate are characterized by ridicule, contempt, schoolyard taunts and, overall, doing to Dr. Reisman and Cameron what is suggested on Page Three of the Official Left-Wing Playbook: "If the facts are completely against you, it's better to attack the messenger rather than attempting t refute the message."
80 posted on 08/31/2002 8:09:26 AM PDT by Bryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: JoshGray
Did he now -- the closest I've seen to that claim was that she dumped him because of his "unpredictable moods and bizarre obsession with homosexual magazines". Do you have a source that he ever admitted to being homosexual?

Roy Cohn denied he was a homosexual so I guess he wasn't one either. (/sarcasm>

I watched a Fox News story on Gacy.

84 posted on 08/31/2002 8:39:39 AM PDT by UbIwerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: JoshGray
You cite the difference between "exclusively" homosexual and "bisexual" and "practiced homosexuality" and "engaged in homosexuality." I think it's clear that everyone in such classifications is not entirely heterosexual; that they do have some homosexual tendencies. There is a lot of research scattered around the scientific community. And everyone has apparently used a different standard to define who is gay and who isn't.

These slight distinctions do not render a compilation of all this research invalid. The overall amount of research -- by licensed mental health professionals, publishing in peer-reviewed medical and psychiatric journals -- is overwhelming. And each source tends to confirm the others.

You also mention the fact that many gays would not respond to surveys in a completely honest fashion, and that many of them would claim to be straight. It undercuts your position because this would, for example, indicate that even more than 91% of molesters of non-familial boys have had no lifetime sexual contact other than homosexual. (Marshall WL et al. "Early Onset and Deviant Sexuality in Child Molesters." Journal of Interpersonal Violence 1991, 6: 323-336.)

People who are not 100% heterosexual are disproportionately dysfunctional in many ways. They are more likely to exhibit symptoms of conditions which the spineless whores at the APA still consider to be mental illnesses, such as anxiety, depression and paranoia. They are more likely to attempt suicide. They are more likely to abuse drugs or alcohol, and to engage in other illegal conduct.

They are more likely to be promiscuous, on a scale that would astonish even the most active heterosexual members of the singles bar scene. As a result, they are more likely to contract a host of sexually transmitted diseases, from the curable (gonorrhea and syphilis) to the incurable and fatal (HIV and hepatitis). They are more likely to die at an early age.

And they are many times more likely to engage in sexual contacts with persons who are below the legal age of consent. The proof for all of this is not the single quick and precise incision with a rhetorical scalpel that you apparently demand. It is death by a thousand cuts, but it is just as effective.

85 posted on 08/31/2002 8:47:15 AM PDT by Bryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: JoshGray
Did he now -- the closest I've seen to that claim was that she dumped him because of his "unpredictable moods and bizarre obsession with homosexual magazines". Do you have a source that he ever admitted to being homosexual?

Btw... This is a homosexual propaganda technique. The pro perversion advocates claim homosexuality is an identity instead of a behavior. By doing this they can claim they're oppressed as blacks were and deny homosexual atrocities are done by homosexuals.

PC liberal types also pull this garbage. In Gaven De Becker's new book, 'Protecting the Gift,' on child molestation, De Becker claims that child molestation is done by "100% heterosexuals."

87 posted on 08/31/2002 9:09:35 AM PDT by UbIwerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson