When tolerance spells rape

WND ^ | September 20, 2002 | Joseph Farah

[Dimensio]

No, nobody can cite a source for that because it is a made-up statistic.

A source can be cited, though. Typically it goes back to the discredited Paul Cameron. Many decry criticism as part of the "homosexual agenda", yet they never actually try to counter the specifics given within the criticism (such as the explanation of how his 'homosexual lifespan' study was total bunk involving utterly worthless methodology).

[Dimensio]

So was he accepted into the organization immedeately after they changed their sexual orientation policy, or was he in before that happened?

[ClearCase_guy]

I’ve already pointed out that this type “behavioral constructionism” is not a scientifically valid determinant of sexual orientation.

One: Your way of expressing yourself is something I see most often in Marxists who are trying to deceive people into believing things which are very obviously untrue.

Two: My point is that if both parties have the same equipment, then it is a homosexual act. You are (unbelievably) trying to argue that it doesn't matter. It (apparently) isn't a homosexual act unless the perpetrator "self-identifies" as homosexual. That, Sir, is a bunch of BS. And I suspect you know it.

[iranger]

"So you judge millions of men by the actions of one? Do you think that’s wise?"

I only offer my evidence as confirmation of what many of us innately know.

[Dimensio]

So if someone is sexually attracted to both people of the same gender and people of the opposite gender, is that someone a homosexual?

[John O]

It's based on crime statistics. Of reported molestations over 1/3 are male on male (homosexual by definition)

(Of course the SAD apologists will say that just because a man molests a boy it's not a homosexual act.)

Freeper Bryan posted a huge compendium of research proving this stat, including the original crime statistics. I've got it bookmarked somewhere but can't find it at the moment.

God Save America (Please)

[fella]

Just a couple of questions. What is the percentage of open homosexuals working in the news media? And what would be the estimated total percentage?

[Darksheare]

Yes. Go to Rahway New Jersey. Neat little place there called Avenel Adult Diagnostic and Treatment Center, right in front of Rahway state prison. The ADTC does very little diagnostic and treatment of anything. And they admit that the sex offenders they hold and release usually commit a crime again.

And most of the offenders in there are homosexual men.
So just take a nice little road trip on down there, go see the sights, and visit the place. Be sure to bring a barf bag as you interview people. Quite a few of teh offenders in there say such nice things like, "My only mistake was letting the victim live!" or, "She/he wanted it!/ was asking for it!"

No, I'm not trying to be nasty to you. It's just a sad commentary on life in this country.

[ClearCase_guy]

Madg is a True Believer who will remain unpersuaded, no matter what.

I feel like having fun: imagine a conversation with such a person:

Madg opines: "No man will ever be President of the United States."

"That's silly. Happens all the time."

"Ha! That's ridiculous! Educated people know it's not true. Name one!"

"George Washington."

"Oh, so 1 example? That's all you have? You extrapolate your data based on one data-point? Don't you think your conclusion is a bit far-fetched? You'd never make it as a scientist! Go on, name another (as if you can)! "

"John Adams."

"Two? That's it? This is silly! There's 3 billion men on the planet, and all you can come up with is 2 who have been President of the United States!"

"Thomas Jefferson."

"Look, these 3 are not men as recognized in the current scientific literature. You're making my case for me. I think people watching this debate realize that you're losing. Clearly, no man has ever been President of the United States."

"James Madison."

"Look, the post-structuralist antinomian view of societal influences may persuade, in a teleological sense, that post-colonial praxis can be realized in a statis environment. But the point you're trying to make was proven to be outmoded by Schottscrer at the Vienna Conference in 1953! No one but a Garibaldian holds those views now! In fact, the dominant hegemony of a patriarchal construct specifically argues against the post-modern denominalist superstructure that you're trying to erect. I think you should admit defeat."

[iranger]

"An isolated example is hardly a “confirmation.” Have you ever heard of a probability sample?"

When you know something innately, a single incident is confirmation of that which you know to be true.

[JoshGray]

That was quick. Usually they try harder.

[frodolives]

No, "queers" are just punished for it more often, because society finds "queers" unacceptable. Society turns a blind eye to most child sex abuse when it's heterosexual. Pedophilia is used as an excuse to attack gays. Gay means you like your own gender, (whatever tricks your trigger, I guess) but pedophile means you are a criminal.

besides, 87 % of statistics are made up.

[iranger]

"Does that mean that getting out of bed every morning is a “confirmation” of gravity??"

yes

"Finally, why would you need “confirmation” of something that you think you already know?"

I don't, but for the non-believers, its another grain of sand heaped upon the mountain of already existing evidence.

"I don’t see how it’s possible that anyone can “innately know” anything about what we’re discussing."

Some of us have a firmer grasp of the obvious than others. Why? Obviously, God gave us all different gifts. I've been aware of my clarity since my early youth.